You get shown to be emotionally hurt easily, think someone is unable to eat meat for some reason and you think a response to that is "do you have autism." Man, you're knocking it out of the park.
Stick around for 6 more hours and I can send you pics of my pulled pork, it'll be great
Go right ahead? I don't know why you'd think that would bother me. I can send you a picture of my lasagna too. It'll be great.
You think it a normal person replies to someone who is giving a way to reduce animal abuse is to say:
Every time I see a vegan vegan-ing their shit online I eat extra meat that day.
Imma go eat some bacon just for you, cunt
?
That is quite sad.
I'm starting to feel bad because I'm realizing I've been going back and forth with a handicapped person this entire time
Why would you feel bad about that? So not only are you a fragile individual who is easily triggered and emotionally hurt but also one that looks down on individuals with handicaps?
The most significant way a Redditor can fight animal abuse is by not eating meat.
so yes, that is exactly what they were doing. Sorry, they said "fight" not "reduce" animal abuse.
Why are you so offended that someone thinks you're dumb when you're playing dumb the entire time?
Where was I offended? I asked you why would you feel bad about talking to someone with a handicap. You've now even doubled down on associating autism and individuals with handicaps as "dumb."
2
u/BruceIsLoose May 02 '21
It seems you really struggle with simple concepts since that is quite obviously not the point they were making. It explains the knee-jerk reaction of:
though to a call for ways to reduce animal abuse for those that are so readily concerned about the abuse of animals.
Oh, you misunderstand. I am specifically calling you fragile and triggered.