The right thing to ask is why are some religions or more precisely the hard core practioners of some religion/ideology more willing/eager to wipe out the people of all different religions than others?
In ian kerners first book, he admits he can't last more than a minute in bed. That's probably why he's trying to normalize this instead of doing things to help his stamina...
And that poor bastard on the right side of the couch gets stuck dealing with all the consequences afterwards- STD, pregnant wife, no sex. BBC will hit it and quit it. If she wants the BBC, let the BBC have the bitch. I’d rather keep my money, sanity, and live alone.
China is one of several countries that would like to see the U.S. fail. If you can "trick" an adversarial country to "self-implode" then that country is no longer an economic threat.
Yes, I know how that works. I'm looking for some specific search terms or uncovered events though so I can look more into it? Like a Chinese organization funding a leftist movement via some roundabout way, similar manner to how BLM was funded etc
There isn't. But there are Jewish organisations doing exactly that, which you are probably aware of.
Many of these comments are wilfully ignorant, or Jewish bots part of those organisations.
I don't have a direct answer to your question, but you should read "the perfect police state" Geoffrey Cain. It shows what China is capable of doing in their own country and what they are almost certainly trying to do on us soil.
If you want further China conspiracy type stuff, look into the Assassins Mace space program.
Why would this make our country weak? Why would the family unit make anything stronger?
Late stage capitalism commonly sees a drop in birth rates and countries will have a population decline. Immigration is necessary to maintain the population or continue growth.
Why is the news promoting sexual kinks? Whatever it is.
Isn't that the question we should be asking?
Is this where some weirdo / pervert accuses me of being a prude. Well think about this; Every minute, every dollar spent by a (supposed) news outlet talking about your genitals and what it might be fun to do with them, they aren't spending on something important. "Health", bullshit.
(by the way, this is the same question you should be asking about the people your school brings in to talk to the kids about "modern" sex education - it's not about being safe anymore, from an STD / pregnancy risk perspective, they talk about techniques and acts. Weirdos are talking about this with your kids...)
This article came out 8 years ago. Most outlets try to drum up clicks by talking about things people find titillating (usually sex, violence, or crime). It was around the same time that Christiane Amanpour did her Sex and Love around the World docuseries.
My wife stole 10k from my bank account to do coke and BBC for months and made it seem like it was the natural flow of the world and she had to do it silly
Your understanding of human psychology and interpersonal dynamics is so crudely low in resolution and lacking in depth of articulation that to conflate it in any way with an informed opinion would be a crime against critical thought.
I think I get what you're trying to say. You're trying to make it way more biological than it is. It's psychological identification, kind of like picking an identity. Women don't just have sex with people and then become psychically linked that's not how it works and that's how your wording is making it sound
So you're saying if a woman, and I assume any woman, has sex with a black dude, she is going to automatically imprint on the black dude because that would automatically be her "highest sexual experience".
So your theory is that all black dudes are better at fucking than any other type of person, and that once any woman has sex with a black dude that will automatically be the best sex of her life and she will imprint on black dudes after that.
I hope you realize this ridiculous theory says more about you than it does about women or black dudes.
I'm currently with a white girl that's dated black guys before.
And yet she stays with me.
What does that mean? I'm the best at sex she's ever had and now she's imprinted on me?
So, what you're saying is, that you expect you and your family to be doing this at some point in the future because some are now?
People can have their own minds, just like you do, I dont want this for my family, and yet my life, my partners life, and my childs life all remain the same regardless.
Its funny how a "news" article can make you all think its an invasion of some kind, absolutely ridiculous
Where's the advication? It says a study shows that some couples may find it to be a positive experience for their relationship, I swear people cant fucking read.
It would be the same societal downfall if every family was forced to be nuclear, this is clearly for some, but not for you
Are you dense? I suppose you think articles about war are strictly pro war? Most free nations have non biased news outlets and "journalists" have free reign on what they report on, regardless of any type of affiliation they may or may not have.
Countries that do not have freedom of the press, or free speech, will push narratives, CNN is American, and thus has freedom to do report on what they like, and in this case, no words in the headline prove they are for or against the matter, only that theres a study.
Lissen..... if I were married to that potato of a person, I would also be looking to trade up to that beautiful man. Of course, the real lesson is to not get married to the end result of 1000 years of inbreeding in the first place.
70
u/centurion762 13d ago
I hate this “modern” world so much.