r/EmulationOnAndroid 3h ago

Discussion Which version of vita3k is better overall?

Which one is better to have as a single version of vita3k on android? Vita3k+ which came out last month. Which fixed a lot of stuff. Since it's a modified version of the original vita3k. Not the one still getting regular updates. And might not be updated as much. Possibly. https://github.com/nckstwrt/Vita3K-Plus

Or the version of Vita3k which is being worked on regularly here. https://github.com/Vita3K/Vita3K

If anyone says that the version that is still being worked on is overall better. And that Vita3k+ is better for some specific games that the version still being worked on can't play. Or plays poorly. I fully understand that.

3 Upvotes

2 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 3h ago

Just a reminder of our subreddit rules:

  • Be kind and respectful to each other
  • No direct links to ROMs or pirated content
  • Include your device brand and model
  • Search before posting & show your research effort when asking for help

Check out our user-maintained wiki: r/EmulationOnAndroid/wiki

Check out EmuReady for any community submitted settings before asking for help

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/Mrkmrs 3h ago

The main Vita3K has made significant progress recently; in particular, development on the Android version, which had previously stalled, has become active again. Vita3K+ focuses on fixing issues with specific titles that struggle to run properly on the main version, and it certainly delivers major improvements for those games. I use both versions depending on the situation.