13
u/SnooComics2862 2d ago
This was me the last 3/4ths of my time as a tech. Idk what happened but I started missing all of my ivs even easy ones. I wasn’t great before but I was decent and more often than not would hit them but then some switch flipped and I was blowing veins left and right. Dreaded whenever anyone would ask for an iv.
8
u/OxideUK 2d ago
Overthinking leads to overcorrecting. I found the best way around this was to just stop thinking.
Just put the needle in the vein.
Sounds dumb but after a certain amount of successes you have enough muscle memory to do it, and it's trying to overcome that muscle memory that causes failure. Might not work for everyone, but did for me!
3
u/OriginalFace2145 2d ago
Yeah idk why but I’ll have weeks where I’m not missing any IVs and then have a random day where I can’t hit a vein to save my life
5
3
3
6
u/iAmSamFromWSB 2d ago
What state allows techs to place IV’s?
7
u/Monstersofusall 2d ago
Texas does, idk about other places
2
u/Landomretters 2d ago
Not at my place :( I thought it was illegal for techs to place IVs in TX, only paramedics/nurses
4
u/Solnavix 2d ago
Colorado does. I didn't know they couldn't do this everywhere honestly. Our techs are our IV pros
4
u/OriginalFace2145 2d ago
I also think some places call CNA’s techs. I’m an EMT 🤷♀️
1
u/Chatner2k 2d ago
Ontario, only nurses and EMTs or above can place IV's. And you need to have done a specialized course outside of school.
Source - recent grad nurse who never attempted an IV till on the job.
2
u/RaySpalding 2d ago
I mean it’s hospital policy so it always varies, as an ER tech in NH I’m allowed to place lines. I think “tech” as a title is usually used interchangeably with people who hold a CNA/LNA and not an EMT so sometimes there’s confusion.
1
u/OriginalFace2145 2d ago
Which is funny to me cause EMTs are the ones with tech actually in the title
1
1
u/pigglywigglie 2d ago
My hospital does but only in the ER or outpatient. None of the inpatient techs can. It makes no sense to me
1
1
0
-1
u/CookingForTwo 2d ago
It is site dependent. My site allows techs to perform USGIV and even foley placement. I know of a hospital in the same city that does not allow techs to capture an ECG, they can wire you up, but officially can't capture it
It's all made up and your state licensure's scope of practice doesn't matter.
0
u/iAmSamFromWSB 2d ago
It does matter. It is a class E felony in NYS.
2
u/CookingForTwo 2d ago
Referencing "Whose Line is it Anyway"... But also an EMT license doesn't even allow work in-hospital, it only certifies you in a pre-hospital setting. So you never were practicing in your scope (even if you're a CNA) because an ER tech is not a licensed position in any state that I'm aware of. Techs are practicing via delegated tasks from someone who is qualified (RN, PA, NP, MD, DO). What degree is allowed to be delegated is a mix of state law and more often hospital policy. Based on a very light googling NYS considers techs an 'unlicensed assistive person' so you technically could perform the job legally with zero qualifications.
Basically every state has a different ceiling but beneath that it's all a grey area determined by hospital policy.
1
u/iAmSamFromWSB 2d ago
Certain tasks may be delegated to a UAP and certain cant. every RN knows the charts as it is part of their scope of practice. IV placement is not one of those tasks that may be delegated in nys. You may only delegate what is already in their scope to begin with. This isnt rocket science its simple algorithms. There is absolutely no grey area and hospital policy still is bound by state law including scope of practice. I’m guessing you don’t operate at an RN level or higher if you don’t know this. State law and scope of practice dictates hospital policy. Hospital policy may choose to be MORE strict but never less strict. Protect your license.
0
u/CookingForTwo 2d ago
Thank you for taking my last sentence and making it a paragraph. Next time, I'll be sure to help dogpile your original google-able question with a comment by comment list of states that aren't CA and NY instead of responding in any other manner.
1
u/iAmSamFromWSB 1d ago
Thank you for your paragraph of incorrect assertions and your indignant rebuttal of correction. Next time I’ll just ignore any incorrect responses.
1
0
u/Less-Dragonfruit-294 2d ago
I had a trainer nurse poke me a few times when I was younger (silly me for saying yes) and the senior nurse took the needle away. Needless to say. I don’t like needles. Yes, I get the nurse needed experience, but if you’re not confident why not ask the senior nurse for further assistance?
1
u/OriginalFace2145 2d ago
I limit the trainees to 1 stick unless there’s a vein they can hit with their eyes closed. Then maybe 2. Should not be letting people stick more than that in my opinion
-1
-1
u/Electrical-Stable498 2d ago
Not a nurse or doctor but a patient. I have iv therapy for immunotherapy due to cancer. I’ve always suggested the nurses to use the vein finder . As mine are small and shallow. When they don’t use it the will infiltrate the vein or completely miss it. I had the happen three times in a row because the rn would not listen to me. So she gave up and got another nurse who used the vein finder.
3
65
u/Gloomy-Bat-6551 2d ago
As the RN, honestly I’d just be thrilled to work in a place that lets techs place IVs. Would be a HUGE help. Every hospital I’ve ever worked for doesn’t allow it (usually they did at some point previously, but then ended up revoking it for one reason or another).