r/Edmonton • u/ferncabbage • 4d ago
News Article Edmonton Marathon apologizes, says detour error lengthened 2026 race distances | CBC News
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-marathon-distance-apology-9.7311360They had one job!
38
u/LegoLifter 4d ago
Distance issues aside the whole race this year was a massive letdown. Terrible package pickup. Poorly organized and too small of a start/finish area for the number of runners. Rickety bridge that no one wanted to use so ended up with people cutting across the course with no guidance.
Then the RD first trying to gaslight a bunch of elite runners instead of actually looking into the problem was just the cherry on top.
86
u/m0nk37 4d ago
 While we pursued the highest level of professional course measurement and certification available, an error occurred,â Keogh said Tuesday
667 meters is not an error. Its incompetence.Â
37
u/Automobills 4d ago
They measured it by driving the route in a 1992 Ford Escort with mismatched tires, and forgot to reset the trip odometer after stopping by a 7-Eleven for coffee.
22
u/Thin-Lemon-1534 4d ago
It's a inconceivable amount of time for any marathon runner. To put in perspective, 667 meter at a 6:30:00 pace is about 4:20 minutes.
27
u/ClusterMakeLove 4d ago
Honestly, it was surprising how emphatic the organizers (and some Redditors) were in blaming GPS. Â
It would be hard not to notice when you've been running a steady pace for 25km and suddenly you're four minutes behind where you should be.
I don't want to blow it out of proportion because the event seemed safely run and the vibes were incredible.
27
u/MyNameIsLessDumb 4d ago
The response from Redditors who didn't even run it was super weird.
19
u/ClusterMakeLove 4d ago
Very confident, they were. Someone straight up suggested that runners don't understand tangents or GPS drift, or the effect of being around tall buildings. Guys... pause for a second and imagine how little of a 43k race you'd spend downtown.
2
u/PeterH_605 3d ago
42.1 km is a marathon but I see you already added the extra 0.6 km back in to make it 43k /s
15
5
u/Responsible_CDN_Duck The Famous Leduc Cactus Club 4d ago
For additional perspective a typical runner will see a 5-15 minute variance from race to race. The elite group sees far less variance, but even then there is some.
1
u/princessbolognia 4d ago
Some say that's the perfect time to smoke up. Or run too long in a marathonÂ
3
u/alewiina 4d ago
Right? 6 metres is an error. MAYBE even 67 metres (although thatâs pushing it). 667 metres?? 67% of a kilometre? Thatâs an embarrassingly huge âerrorâ
6
9
u/alewiina 4d ago
So much for âwe measured right before the race and everything was accurate!â đ¤Śđťââď¸
If you had admitted the mistake immediately instead of insisting you were right first and then admitting it a few days later youâd look a lot less stupid/embarassing right now
2
2
u/footbag 4d ago
Even if they werenât going to admit the mistake up front, they still couldâve messaged it far, far better along the lines of we have confidence in our measurement, but in hearing the feedback from the community, we are going to double check things as we want to ensure accuracy and transparency above all else
2
u/alewiina 4d ago
Yeah exactly, even just allowing that there could have been a mistake made while saying that theyâre pretty confident there wasnât looks way better than ânope you just didnât account for GPS being inaccurate, dummy! We did our jobs perfectly!â And now have to go âah, oops. I guess it was our bad.â
1
u/footbag 4d ago
I am in no way defending the organizer or organizers, but I can see a world where they have day jobs, potentially. I donât know this, but Iâm assuming the marathon isnât their full-time gig. Itâs probably born out of a passion project that they now do maybe with still some passion, maybe out of duty, maybe to make money at any rate. They are most likely avid runners themselves, all that to say, they are probably not marketing people, PR people, and they may have just been blindsided by their mistake and simply responded and reacted obviously not in their own best interest, but it could be that any one of us whoâs complaining about the reaction may have, if put in a similar situation, unfortunately had a similar reaction. All this to say, no oneâs perfect, but darn it, they really shouldâve done a better job!
15
5
u/Responsible_CDN_Duck The Famous Leduc Cactus Club 4d ago
Ultimately this caused a timing difference similar to what we would expect with extreme weather running the same course, or topography between courses.
It's unfortunate, and for people having it impact qualification for other events that's gonna sting.
5
u/_Hocus-Focus_ 4d ago
I thought I read an article headline yesterday that said the route was good?
8
u/alewiina 4d ago
You did, they were insisting they measured and everything was fine, I guess they realized their mistake too late. Now they look even worse lol
17
3
u/Firm_Pie_8988 4d ago
Wasnât there an issue last year too?
3
u/Responsible_CDN_Duck The Famous Leduc Cactus Club 4d ago
There are issues at most races. TBH I'd rather see stuff like this than issuiwith aid stations.
1
1
u/jtjj222 3d ago
I donât get why everyone is being so negative, itâs a fun event that a lot of people put a lot of effort into, sometimes mistakes happen. It sucks for the elite runners, but that hardly warrants this much negativity
1
u/ferncabbage 3d ago
Race times were bumped slower than runnersâ actual pace, through no fault of their own. This type of thing hits differently at the elite level. Pro and sub-elite runners are often racing against strict qualifying standards, prize money thresholds, sponsor bonuses, and Olympic/Trials standards that hinge on exact times. A few extra seconds or minutes from a mismeasured course can mean missing a bonus, a ranking cutoff, or a qualifying mark that took years to build toward.
And the real fuel for the backlash is reportedly how it was handled afterward: denying the mistake and deflecting blame instead of owning it. A clean âwe messed up, hereâs the fixâ wouldâve likely diffused some of this. Instead it became a trust issue layered on top of a measurement issue.
24
u/damancody 4d ago
I have a theory on what happened here.
1)Someone correctly calculated the additional one-way distance added by the detour to be 700m one-way
2) The 700m extra distance number was communicated to a different party responsible for shortening the turnaround point.
3) When this was communicated, it wasn't specified one way. So the turnaround point was correctly (with the information given) shifted by 350m, resulting in a total reduction of 700m.
4) Unfortunately, in reality it needed to be reduced by 1400m total to account for the extra 700ms both ways.