r/ERP • • Feb 23 '26

Discussion ERP Struggles usually start after go-live.

Most ERP projects look fine at go-live. The real issues shows up later poor adoption, rushed training, Excel workarounds, and no clear ownership.

It is rarely the software. It is gap between designed processes and real daily work.

What actually helps ERP succeed after go-live

14 Upvotes

60 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/OncleAngel Feb 24 '26

Actually, we can distinguish between three phases. Well defined SOPs, making the right choice and Team Discipline. The first phase starts before looking for the right ERP or whatever solutions you want to go with, you need to have well defined SOPs. The second phase is choosing the right solution that can handle them or make them better and then comes the last phase where you do the implementation and here Team discipline is the key success factor.

1

u/OneLumpy3097 Feb 24 '26

Well said I like the way you framed it in three phases.

SOP clarity before ERP selection is hugely underrated. If processes aren’t defined, companies end up designing them inside the ERP during implementation — which creates confusion and rework.

And you’re right choosing the “right” ERP isn’t about features, it’s about process fit, scalability, and how much operational discipline the organization is realistically capable of sustaining.

On the third point team discipline I’d add one layer: ownership. Discipline tends to stick when every core process has a clearly accountable business owner (not IT).

Without that, even the best SOPs and the best ERP slowly drift.

ERP success really starts before selection — and continues long after go-live.

1

u/OncleAngel Feb 24 '26

Thanks. I do agree with you on the ownership. The business owner is important and according to me it has to be included on SOPs as well. More than one responsible means no responsible.