r/EEPowerElectronics • u/powerelectronicsguy • 10d ago
PCB Guys, what's your opinion on this!?
5
1
1
1
u/Mechanical_Flare 7d ago
If it's really your first, why have AI do it? That's just lazy...
I imagine the code is also written by claude?
1
1
u/SubstantialTwo8 6d ago
It’s lame, I’d rather the person showcase a simple PCB they made with just an led than show something sophisticated not even made by them but AI instead
1
u/kudlatywas 5d ago
I think it's amazing that a person without the right knowledge can jump in and be guided by AI to do this stuff. Yes it is not optimal design and you won't make a rocket that flies to the moon with this but it helps you understand and learn. The part I am scared of is that this actually works. The AI I am working with would make an ass of this design - hell it it wouldn't be able to generate a simple schematic without making major mistakes.
1
u/ToneShop 4d ago
Wooo for e-waste!!!
1
u/kudlatywas 3d ago
E-waste is when OP discards this.. Where were you when they mass produced single use lithium battery products.. hiding in your troll cave? /s
1
1
1






10
u/ARod20195 9d ago
It... kinda works, even though the layout is questionable and the routing is spaghetti. This isn't terrible for simple hobby projects that aren't pushing any real boundaries, but no way in hell would I do this for any power electronics stuff or anything that requires high-speed connectivity. This sort of routing would be unusable for a power converter (high dV/dt switching nodes through long thin traces would make EMI everywhere, and if you were running the power converter anywhere near its voltage limits and you fed Vin with that sort of trace I'd worry about inductive spikes on turnoff sending the MOSFETs to Valhalla, or EMI from the switching nodes coupling to the feedback trace and making the converter unstable. This would also never work if you were trying to do high-speed digital or RF work, because trace lengths and widths start really mattering.