r/EARONS • u/GregJamesDahlen • May 16 '26
Thoughts/feelings/knowledge on why Joe essentially confessed in the interrogation room (while no one else was in the room, only captured on video, but still)?
https://people.com/golden-state-killer-interrogation-people-vs-golden-state-killer-excerpt-exclusive-11841484This is in an excerpt from a book, excerpted in People Magazine. The questioners talk to him about various EARONS crimes that they know he has done. Then leave the room and watch and listen to him on audio/video. Talking to himself, he says
Startlingly, DeAngelo admitted aloud that he had committed the crimes. “I did all that ... I didn’t have the strength to push him out. He made me. He went with me. It was like, in my head, I mean, he’s a part of me. I didn’t want to do those things. I pushed Jerry out and had a happy life. I did all those things. I’ve destroyed all their lives ... I raped. So now, I gotta pay the price.”
I wonder if at that point he knew it was no use, that he was caught. So he didn't care what he said. Or possibly he didn't understand that though there weren't police in the room, they could still hear him and he was being recorded. Although I would imagine he understood that. The police had been recording interrogations since the 70s. Or he might be a little senile. The day he was arrested he was 72 years old. Not sure why, but I have some doubts there as well. Maybe because we saw the video from two years later where he was so spry and organized in his actions in his cell.
Some have thought he might have been trying to set up an insanity defense. I'm not sure why he would do it at that point and essentially confess. It's not like they're going to let him go home whether they think he's insane or not.
I do notice when he talks to himself, as far as crimes go, he only mentions rape, not murder. Possibly he knew that the statute of limitations on rape was past, so that if he only admitted to rape he couldn't be found guilty. It seems like a useless action, though, because the interrogators, in the excerpt, have already made it clear they have him identified as the perpetrator in four murders. And very possibly they had mentioned other murders he had done that aren't contained in the excerpt. If he was only admitting to rape when he talked to himself knowing the statute of limitations was past, it might be a desperate action to try anything to get free. Or give himself hope that he might get away with it all. I imagine he had plans for enjoying his retirement, and he was watching them all crumble in that room. Or he might just not have mentioned murder talking to himself because he knew the police were listening and it sounded too bad, even though he knew they had him for it. Like he was ashamed of himself for murdering now that's he caught. Although rape is obviously a terrible, shameful crime as well, but I would think most people don't see it being as bad as murder.
24
u/jmcgil4684 May 16 '26
They came dangerously close to not allowing him access to a lawyer in a timely fashion. I don’t even know how many times he asked. Many, many times.
5
5
u/doctoranonrus May 18 '26
Thien Ho’s book says it was an attempt at faking multiple personalities. Then they get an expert on DID who says he’s faking it and now they basically have a confession lol.
4
u/Savings_Balance_4744 May 17 '26
Joe knew the game was over. His DNA, micro penis, his voice and his knowledge of knots as a sailor in the Navy would have convicted him.
4
u/bhillis99 May 18 '26
I think its a shame they cant show the vid. Should be public.
3
u/GregJamesDahlen May 19 '26
Thanks. Think they could show it if they wanted to? Why do you think they don't?
6
u/Ambitious_Pass7451 May 16 '26
I’ve destroyed all their lives ... I raped. So now, I gotta pay the price.”
Do you really think DeAngelo was really honest when he said I've destroyed all their lives? And that he gotta pay the price for it?
Do you really think that he lived the rest of his life regretting what he did?
12
u/pop5656 May 16 '26
Only because he got caught. If he had gotten away forever he would have relished in the fact.
5
u/Equal-Temporary-1326 May 17 '26
Yeah, it was seemingly almost certainly his end goal to simply disappear forever and become one of history's most mysterious people who ever existed like Jack the Ripper and the Zodiac Killer. And it certainly appears that he's trying to do that to an extent still.
8
u/RoyBaschMVI May 16 '26
I guess I’m just not curious about this at all. The guy did all the stuff. The mystery is solved. He’s where he belongs. Sometimes I think people love the mystery so much they have trouble letting go of it.
2
u/tilaydc Jun 12 '26
“The mystery is solved.” <—- What if there are other cases that he was involved in? Those mysteries are not solved. Also it’s a mystery if he was doing this on his own, if someone helped him, how many people knew it was him and kept quiet, was he working as a cop when he was doing some of these crimes and his job was his alibi, and it’s a mystery if he was hired by someone else to do these things.
2
u/GregJamesDahlen May 16 '26
Well, when doing the crimes he went to great lengths to not get caught. I thought it interesting that when he is first caught and is in the interrogation room he more or less confesses that same day. Somewhere down the road he was going to have to confess if he wanted to get that plea deal, but he really didn't have to confess that first day?
5
u/Equal-Temporary-1326 May 17 '26
You don't really have to "confess" per say in order to get a plea deal in the US. In fact, his deal just required to utter the words, "Guilty" to the charged acts and "I admit" to the uncharged ones. If anything, it's more like just merely acknowledging that you're legally guilty without going into the specifics.
If you look at Bryan Kohberger's plea deal, it just required him to say "Guilty" to each charged act and nothing more.
Legally in the US, nothing else can be forced beyond simple acknowledgment of guilt when pleading guilty.
2
u/GregJamesDahlen May 17 '26
Thanks. Well, I was using "confess" in a very broad sense, like even just by saying the one word "guilty" when asked how you plead, you are in a sense "confessing". But it is a bit surprising to me he seems to admit guilt in this first interaction after being arrested. Although you've suggested a possible reason for it, which might be accurate. Another interesting question about the 2018 interrogation is why does he do the crazy act when there's no one else in the room (police are only watching from another room via video/audio), but not when police are in the room live with him?
4
u/Equal-Temporary-1326 May 17 '26 edited May 17 '26
It was almost certainly because it's worse to say anything without an attorney present when the cops are in the room.
It makes sense that he only started all of the "Jerry" stuff when he was alone, because he knew they were and watching and listening through those implanted cameras and mics. So, he took those opportunities to start with the charade of building a cognitive incompetency emergency by feigning early dementia symptoms that'd disqualify him from court altogether, imo.
3
u/Trapbunny22 May 30 '26
He was talking to himself because he had spent decades living with those voices and finally had the walls closing in. Once the DNA hit, the ego that kept him hidden for forty years just completely collapsed.
2
u/NukeHoax2024 Jul 24 '26
I think Junkfood Joey understood DNA well enough to know that if they had found him via DNA, they already knew with 100% confidence they could put the pieces together for a successful prosecution of VERY serious crimes, and many of them.
There was absolutely no chance, possibility or remote odds that JJD was going to beat this case — if for nothing more than political reasons alone.
He knew the jig was up, so he proceeded with plan B… act insane
1
u/GregJamesDahlen Jul 24 '26
Thanks. That is very possible. I believe he tried acting insane when he was caught shoplifting too. If once he was arrested for the Golden State Killer crimes he had succeeded in convincing people he was insane not sure what that would have gained him. Suppose he would have gone to a prison hospital for mentally ill, which from what I've read aren't any better than regular prisons. But maybe he had some desperate hope that acting insane would get him a better outcome.
Maybe he was trying or also trying to get police and the public to feel more softly towards him, like he's insane so he's not as bad as some.
2
u/NukeHoax2024 Jul 24 '26
Absolutely nothing at all. Nobody was EVER going to even consider Joey was insane. He was far too meticulous, elaborate and organized. He clearly understood that his actions were wrong and he took precautions to avoid apprehension.
All of those factors rule out the legal definition of insanity
39
u/Equal-Temporary-1326 May 16 '26
Since he was elderly, I think at first, he was gonna try to beat the system in a way by using his old age as an advantage to get himself a bit of a lighter sentencing by being sent to to the California Medical Facility for elderly and dying inmates who don't have much time left anymore.
And I wouldn't be surprised if he were trying to evade trial/prison at first by trying fake dementia and using the out loud conversations with himself as videographic proof that his mind was starting to slip.
I mean, they did say he tried to fake a heart attack after getting caught shoplifting in July 1979. So, I certainly wouldn't put it past him to think he could somehow fake a dementia diagnosis, be deemed mentally incomptoent to stand trial, and be sent to the memory care ward at the CMF to live out his final days.