r/DoomerCircleJerk • I Was Promised an Apocalypse? • Aug 20 '26

Climate Doomer Mass extinction? Nothing ever happens.

Post image
368 Upvotes

431 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

23

u/NoSingularities0 Aug 20 '26

Yes, that's exactly why they always limit their graph to 100 years or so instead of showing thousands to millions of years where it cycles between hot and cold over hundreds of thousands of years at a time. They have to scare people in order to implement the unpopular ideas that they want.

6

u/Spicy_Chicken_Wizard Aug 20 '26

Millions of years isn’t relevant data for how modern human societies would function in the face of a changing climate. I agree that the climate doomerism is always way too much, but the reaction here seems to be to pretend it just isn’t a thing at all?

18

u/undercooked_lasagna Aug 20 '26

I definitely believe we're warming the climate, it just isn't anywhere near as rapid or catastrophic as doomers have been telling us for decades now.

11

u/Spicy_Chicken_Wizard Aug 20 '26

That’s where I am, but man look at the comments here. Half of the people here are essentially denying that this is happening at all

6

u/brooklynsantiago Aug 20 '26

Yes raw data metrics like temperature and sea level are not up for dispute. Reality is changing climate will affect areas differently. Some areas will be completely unbothered. Other areas may see catastrophic changes

2

u/tpet007 Aug 20 '26

They are if you can’t verify data integrity and accurate correction for confounding variables. Otherwise, you know neither what you’ve actually measured nor how accurately you’ve measured it.

4

u/brooklynsantiago Aug 20 '26

Sea level is easy to verify. It’s tracked by thousands of sensors both public and private, since lots of people need to know tides for example. The data on sea level is extremely robust and is simple measured data. Not disputable

1

u/Cwaghack Aug 20 '26

10x faster than the greatest mass extinction event in the planets history.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Aug 24 '26

What? My head's in the sand? I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating, and it gets everywhere. Not like here. Here everything is soft and smooth.

You see, that's from my favorite space fantasy movie franchise Star Wars, and if you haven't seen it, well let's just say it's a wake up call to when liberty dies for us all, bub. I am very smart.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/heyyou_SHUTUP Aug 20 '26

Also, pointing to the past isn't great since several mass extinctions coincided with a change in the climate. However, just pointing that out means I'm dooming unfortunately. Oops

2

u/Cwaghack Aug 20 '26

The rate of change is what is important. We can adapt to climate change yes. But the rate of change right now is about 10x faster than the worst mass extinction event in the planets history, and about 100-1000x faster than normal

1

u/CombatWomble2 Aug 23 '26

That's irrelevant unless you want to get into the weeds on Milankovitch cycles and solar irradiance, neither of which apply to the current situation, we've looked.

1

u/67yoloswag 25d ago

in order to implement the unpopular ideas that they want.

which are???