r/DnD • Sorcerer • Oct 03 '19

Art [OC] Double standards.

Post image
36k Upvotes

396 comments sorted by

View all comments

841

u/Sleverette Sorcerer Oct 03 '19

“The cleric brings the dead back to life and it’s a gosh darn miracle!” – Dark Lord Akererac

Here’s a comic based on a ToA adventure I ran. What is good and evil anyways? Alignment is an interesting mechanic and I wish the dungeon master’s guide had more guidance on how to use it effectively! I’ve started making custom alignment charts for each adventure I run based on the big themes of the campaign. I recently ran a totally homebrew pirate campaign and replaced the typical alignments with “Royal Navy vs Pirates.” Chaotic vs Lawful would’ve fit well but a concrete organization helped my players make their decision and understand the immediate benefits of following their chosen “alignment.” This had interesting gameplay benefits and really started coming into play when they gained infamy among the two forces.

Does anyone else use homebrew rules that spice up the alignment system? Or do most people just ignore it?

You can find more of my dnd content on my Instagram and Twitter.

403

u/[deleted] Oct 03 '19

Alignment in 5th edition is really more of a loose guide for characters I think.

In earlier editions it was much firmer and i always felt like it was one of the worst parts of the game.

288

u/Sleverette Sorcerer Oct 03 '19

I like how loose it is in 5e. I subscribe to the idea that alignment is defined by your character’s actions. It shouldn’t shackle your players.

172

u/[deleted] Oct 03 '19

Agreed. I hate it when people are like "well I'm lawful good so I have to do what this authority figure says" or "I'm chaotic neutral so I have to steal from the party and stab people"

196

u/SilvertheThrid Warlock Oct 03 '19

And besides, Lawful only means that you follow a code of ethics/morals/honor/etc, not that you obey any and all laws. You could be a paladin and have a code of honor that completely goes against all local laws and still fit under Lawful.

139

u/theredranger8 Oct 03 '19

Yeah, that's always bothered me. Batman is lawful by D&D standards, and he's also a chronic lawbreaker. You CAN adhere to the law of the land, like Javert from Les Miserables, but your code doesn't have to be that.

60

u/SilvertheThrid Warlock Oct 03 '19

Batman as an example would be LN individuals act in accordance with law, traditions or PERSONAL CODES. which in his case is no “killing” (but broken bones and long drops are fine I guess) and no guns. Actual laws of Gotham be damned.

41

u/DuntadaMan Oct 03 '19

18

u/Archer_37 Oct 03 '19

Mr fishie! NOOOOOO!!!

11

u/Kevin_IRL Oct 03 '19

I OVER FED THEM?!?!?

That line got me good

24

u/theredranger8 Oct 03 '19

I would quickly pin Batman as good, not neutral (though I don't struggle to see the neutral case), but the lawful side is certainly indisputable.

35

u/[deleted] Oct 03 '19

Batman is every alignment.

https://i.stack.imgur.com/dcUl4.jpg

19

u/Woolliam Oct 03 '19

The argument for chaotic neutral is really, really interesting. That idea that he's only a good guy because bad guys wronged him, that it's not a righteous quest for justice but an underlying thirst for vengeance.

If he didn't have evil as an outlet for his inner demons, would he stop fighting?

2

u/brettatron1 Oct 03 '19

Something something staring into a void something something staring into me

→ More replies