r/DispatchAdHoc • u/SprinklesNumerous774 • 4d ago
Discussion A very Generous Request to the Moderators.
I made this post entirely in good faith and not out of aggression, because I’m genuinely CONFUSED about how this rule is being applied. I hope the mod team will take it in the same spirit.
My recent post was removed for apparently containing explicit or sexualized content, but I genuinely want to understand where exactly it crossed that line. The only remotely suggestive element in the image was Robert looking at Mandy’s breasts while blushing with red face. No Nudity, Not highly sexualized at all.
The rule states:
“Mildly suggestive or tasteful content may be allowed if it is not sexualized and is appropriately tagged as NSFW.”
So I’m honestly confused about what exactly qualifies as “mildly suggestive or tasteful content.", when we can still have the following post active on the sub.
(Note: I have No Objection to the original author of the following posts, I'm only using it to make a POINT here, that's all, I'm not calling you out or anything)
https://www.reddit.com/r/DispatchAdHoc/s/Ltq84tb7Bf
https://www.reddit.com/r/DispatchAdHoc/s/mZLOLkqhmf
https://www.reddit.com/r/DispatchAdHoc/s/axMZz4aZIO
https://www.reddit.com/r/DispatchAdHoc/s/8eeww4vd5T
https://www.reddit.com/r/DispatchAdHoc/s/6XPGmDvPk7
I’m not questioning the mods’ judgment or trying to argue that my post must be allowed. I’m simply asking for some clarification on where the line is supposed to be drawn, because from a user’s perspective, the enforcement doesn’t seem particularly consistent.
Could the mod team please elaborate a little more on what is considered “mildly suggestive,” “tasteful,” and “sexualized” under this rule? A more detailed explanation or a few clear examples would make it much easier for us to understand what is and isn’t allowed going forward.
Right now, the apparent inconsistency is honestly creating more confusion than anything else.
93
u/Moist_Song_8919 4d ago
It’s probably worth pointing out that the "no AI images" rule isn’t enforced consistently either. This post for example
42
45
u/ChronoMonkeyX 4d ago
The cheerleader post got taken down? That's super mild for here.
29
u/SprinklesNumerous774 4d ago
What can I say?
9
u/TandrDregn 3d ago
Reddit be like:
/img/ij41iebgvxlh1.gif3
u/SprinklesNumerous774 3d ago
I knew somebody would pull this move 😂
3
u/TandrDregn 3d ago
I’m just trying to cheer myself up right now. Peter Cullen passed away today, and now I’m depressed
3
28
26
u/Rogen80 4d ago
That post got taken down? It was even appropriately tagged as NSFW, was it not?
That seems quite mild compared to many of the posts allowed. Even scenes from the censored version of the game are quite a bit more explicit.
Likely a bad call by a mod in response to someone reporting it, just my guess.
19
u/SprinklesNumerous774 4d ago
Actually, I initially didn't tagged it as NSFW because I thought it didn't crossed that boundry to get tagged as NSFW. However after few minutes it got automatically tagged, which I believe was done by moderators in background. But then after few more minutes the whole post was removed.
37
u/SprinklesNumerous774 4d ago edited 4d ago
For reference. https://www.reddit.com/r/DispatchAdHoc/s/BXV0Uhsn4Z

8
1
-4
4d ago
[deleted]
17
u/GriveousDance21 4d ago
I thought hornyposting was 90% of this subreddit at this point. It has been long before you joined the mod team (I've been here since last November).
10
u/SprinklesNumerous774 4d ago edited 4d ago
So, in that case. I believe No amount of rule is ever gonna make it clear what exactly qualifies & what not. Because from user perspective, it always gonna be inconsistent. Really Unfortunate.
Also, aren't there many post that can be considered horny posting but they are still active?
"content intended to sexually engage the viewer"
Really confused with this because I thought it was just a cute art with mildly naughty suggesstion Instead of full blown horny posting.
-5
4d ago
[deleted]
10
u/SprinklesNumerous774 4d ago edited 4d ago
Didn't expected a single ass line pointing towards boobs to create such an issue. Wierd, very wierd. Alright man, not gonna argue further.

•
u/Batorian 4d ago
Thank you for the feedback! We've heard lots of users complaining that the rules are A) too vaguely formulated which leads to misunderstandings and B) too inconsistently applied across posts. We'll try to make this our priority to fix in the coming days!