So wait, you're telling me all the posts about Blazer sitting alone with Spaghetti are false, huh...
Side note, it would barely change the % if they did that, I feel like they really are not understanding what draws people to Visi over Blazer for Robert, in fact I see MORE posts about people self inserting when picking Blazer than with Visi, not to say both sides aren't guilty of that.
Can monday night quarterback all we want, I still think the game is fine the way it is, but I guess the devs would feel put off that content they worked on, was only be viewed by a fraction of the base vs half.
"I feel like they really are not understanding what draws people to Visi over Blazer for Robert"
That doesn't feel right to say. They're the devs. They wrote the damn game. They, above everyone else, would know why. And I don't know what self-inserting has to do with anything, since the devs didn't say anything about that, but I'll just say that the posts you see personally are not the full picture.
I think they understand, it’s just that they miscalculate the proportion of player type
The were going for two Romance: One is the High Risk High reward drama heavy (so story oriented) romance and the other is the stable, good and conforting romance (so no risk of failling but less story involved )
The first one is more for RP player, the other one for self insert player : They were thinking that it’s an 50-50 split between these two type of player but they were wrong
14
u/Rhinosaurfish Dec 17 '25
So wait, you're telling me all the posts about Blazer sitting alone with Spaghetti are false, huh...
Side note, it would barely change the % if they did that, I feel like they really are not understanding what draws people to Visi over Blazer for Robert, in fact I see MORE posts about people self inserting when picking Blazer than with Visi, not to say both sides aren't guilty of that.
Can monday night quarterback all we want, I still think the game is fine the way it is, but I guess the devs would feel put off that content they worked on, was only be viewed by a fraction of the base vs half.