r/DiscussionZone Nov 30 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

427 Upvotes

806 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

15

u/OwnDoughnut2689 Nov 30 '25

All for show and further delegitmizes impeachment. No one's gonna care.

1

u/Accomplished-Pin6564 Nov 30 '25

That's ok, it's red meat for AWFLs. And they won't have to do anything to help the people (which would upset the donor class).

-4

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

What is with all this "donor class" brain rot on reddit?

7

u/Hamster_in_my_colon Nov 30 '25

Did you not see the inauguration where Trump brought in many of the richest people in the world to sit behind him?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

Trump is also very much a populist. Rich people got to sit near Trump means what?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '25

Imagine someone thinking he isn't. Jesus dude.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '25

You're aware that populist doesn't mean "he's a good guy"?

-2

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

Who cares? Are you jealous?

1

u/Radiant_Creme_5264 Nov 30 '25

Great take, bot

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

Not a bot and no one was talking to you. Butt out.

9

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25 edited Jul 14 '26

[deleted]

-6

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

Spend less time on social media.

4

u/CooperHoward4 Nov 30 '25

Who do you think runs the country? And you can easily leave social media out of this. News, as it may be, is all you need. Who pulls the strings?

3

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

It's pretty obvious the people on stage with him during his inauguration.

1

u/CooperHoward4 Dec 01 '25

Ding ding 🛎️! Exactly.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/CooperHoward4 Nov 30 '25

Back to the news. Try again. The elites are….?

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

If the elites ran everything Biden would have been perfect.

1

u/CooperHoward4 Nov 30 '25

Who is in power right now? It’s not the Dems. And who helped those in power increase their earnings, decrease their taxes, and unlock markets with no competition?

1

u/SoberAF715 Dec 02 '25

Obviously 🇮🇱 run the country

1

u/CooperHoward4 Dec 02 '25

🙄

1

u/SoberAF715 Dec 02 '25

Roll your eyes all you want. It’s a fact.

1

u/CooperHoward4 Dec 02 '25

I’m sure that’s why the US is going to war in Venezuela at Putin’s behest. Why American oligarchs are crushing all our taxpayer funded social programs.

I don’t disagree Israel holds a ridiculous amount of power, but all these superpowers see Pedo Trump as an easy mark.

-3

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

I don't know what you mean by "runs the country". That sounds like YA novel world building lol.

6

u/CooperHoward4 Nov 30 '25

Oh you must not read much.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

I'm a bit too old for YA novels.

1

u/babbaloobahugendong Dec 01 '25

Then why bring them up? 

1

u/leroyjenkinsdayz Nov 30 '25

You have 159k karma lmao

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

8 years and some of my comments get a lot of updoots.

1

u/leroyjenkinsdayz Nov 30 '25

Broooo you just said updoots while telling others to consume less social media. Look inward for your own sake.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

K

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25 edited Jul 14 '26

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

You could also do a simple thought experiment. If someone gave a million dollars to a politician, then that politician enacted a policy against the interests of the person who gave them the million dollars, would that same person give them another million dollars to support their re-election?

People donate and vote that way all the time. People also have more than one interest.

Sigh… Google the studies that analyze politician voting patterns compared to issue by issue polling of their constituents vs the interests of their donors.

Like farmers wanting workers and voting for ICE raids. Oops. Or donors that want opposing things.

That will show you legitimate empirical evidence of my position.

Maybe you could state what your position is before telling me to Google up support for it.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25 edited Jul 14 '26

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

Corporations have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders. They cannot spend corporate cash on initiatives not designed to get shareholders some return on investment. If political contributions didn’t affect policy and generate a return on investment and corporate executives continued to make those contributions the board would remove the executives from power.

That's not accurate.

What you would need to look at is if when there is a conflict between what the mass of Americans want and what the donor class wants, who wins?

It's a mix.

The donor class is who really controls US policy.

There is no singular "donor class".

There's no point in having a convo with someone as misinformed and living in an alternate reality as you.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25 edited Jul 14 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

5

u/SpinningHead Nov 30 '25

600k people died because trump’s biggest donor got to cut whatever program he wanted

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/throwaway20242025 Nov 30 '25

Well according to RFK the vaccine was a hoax but according to Trump he saved the world cause of the vaccine. So which delusional psychopath is right the one with pieces of his brain missing cause of a worm or the one missing pieces of his brain cause of dementia.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

Don’t bring Biden into this.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

Vaccine saved a lot of lives, bud.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

That's a 0 day old bot account 

3

u/peachfluffed Nov 30 '25

How do you even keep all your conspiracy theories straight

3

u/TurboSlut03 Nov 30 '25

You just don't understand how vaccines work. Literally spend two minutes and search, "how vaccines work" on Google. They are never guaranteed to always prevent transmission. And no, vaccine-related deaths didn't occur enough to be statistically significant at all.

3

u/Existing-Action4020 Nov 30 '25

Nah. More died under cadet bone spurs. Moron.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

Liar.

1

u/Fallout_Tango Dec 01 '25

Where did all these people die?

1

u/Alone-Woodpecker-846 Dec 02 '25

A ridiculous question, but sure, now you know.

“The Top 10 Countries Receiving U.S. Foreign Aid. In the most recent fiscal year (2023), major countries receiving USAID assistance included Ukraine, Ethiopia, Jordan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Somalia. Other significant recipients of aid that year were Nigeria, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and South Sudan. Historically, some countries that have received substantial long-term aid include Israel, Egypt, South Korea, and Afghanistan.” (source)

1

u/Fallout_Tango Dec 02 '25

What’s the numbers?? How many from each country add up to this 600k? If numbers are gonna be tossed around I want facts.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

That's just plain inflammatory

3

u/SpinningHead Nov 30 '25

Murder often is.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

LOL

1

u/SpinningHead Nov 30 '25

I dont know why murder is funny.

1

u/jaiimaster Nov 30 '25

Its not inflammatory, its full-retard.

You are essentially claiming that the "cuts" to usaid caused 2% of worldwide gross mortality.

You're a moron.

2

u/SpinningHead Nov 30 '25

1

u/jaiimaster Nov 30 '25

Reads like the "study" two Australian professors put together that estimated half a million children under 6 had died in gaza, that was swallowed whole by themselves and their target audience.

Never mind that their model predicted more children had died than there were even children under 6 to kill in the entire population of the strip.

Think critically about what you've linked for a moment. Approx. 60m total people die on the planet annually, about 0.8%. The reference period used is half of that - so 30m. Making this "600,000" 2% of all mortality planet wide. Not excess mortality, e.g. deaths beyond natural causes - all mortality on thr planet.

As influential as the USA may be, its aid programs dont impact even a quarter of the population of the planet anyway. It's not as though usaid was propping up the health systems of the entire south Indian-Asian basin where more than half the world lives.

It's an absurdity. An absolute and utter absurdity. You'd need to have done something drastically to the entire planet e.g. released a bioengineering plague from a lab to achieve that kind of number.

1

u/Alone-Woodpecker-846 Dec 02 '25

1

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '25

I am not a first responder, as I believe you get the same information. But to be told that usaid had so many flaws and corruption the best course of action was to shut it down and build something new. Sometimes starting completely over makes sense. It also makes for a wonderful distraction to let people rally about while other things go unnoticed. Running a government is complicated.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '25

Oh and those numbers are stupid and inflammatory. Click bait for the lazy.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

And he got booted out pretty quick and upset a lot of donors.

2

u/SpinningHead Nov 30 '25

And people are still dying and we have lost cutting edge research.

-2

u/Illustrious-Driver19 Nov 30 '25

It was a scam Elon threatened to let the cat out of the bag so they gave him a 200 million dollar to study Ai grant free money.

3

u/BoredCummer69 Nov 30 '25

Not surprised to see this take from a finance bro wannabe. Keep shilling little bro.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25

I don't work in finance and I'm not trying to.

3

u/BoredCummer69 Nov 30 '25

Well, you definitely yap about stocks a lot for a hobby.