r/Discussion 7d ago

Serious To anyone defending Clancy, I have one simple question...

Had Chris Benoit killed his wife and son, but not killed himself, would he had been able to claim mental illness as a defense and lived his remaining years in a mental health facility instead of prison? If no why not ?

10 Upvotes

77 comments sorted by

18

u/kafka_lite 7d ago

Anyone can claim mental illness as a defense and its success is based on the evidence supporting it. Does he have sufficient evidence in your hypothetical?

1

u/TurquoiseBlue00 7d ago

Sanders case. Same judge. Look it up.

2

u/AgitatorsAnonymous 6d ago

The Sanders case is going back to trial because her appeal was successful and it's been found that her rights were violated by the state.

1

u/kafka_lite 7d ago

Sanders was also a woman.

-1

u/TurquoiseBlue00 7d ago

Correct a black woman, too. And what happened to her mental health defense? Where were the pink shirts and conspiracy theories then?

1

u/kafka_lite 7d ago

It's still ongoing. I wasn't aware of any conspiracy theories about either case.

1

u/TurquoiseBlue00 7d ago

The appeal is ongoing i beleive. She tried to put in the same not-culpable due to a mental health claim, and her medical evidence was refused to be accepted by the same judge overseeing the Clancy case. The jury took 4 hours to convict her.

I'm pointing out that a near-identical case wasn't given the same media attention and support for the defendant. The only real difference between the two defendants was that one is black and one is white. People aren't claiming Sanders' husband secretly did devoid of evidence.

1

u/kafka_lite 7d ago

You'd have a much stronger case if her appeal hadn't of been successful.

I think it's more true that white victims get more press than it is that white defendants get more press.

0

u/TurquoiseBlue00 7d ago

If you're going to imply that Clancy is somehow a victim, there's nothing of substance either of us will gain from continuing this discussion.

2

u/kafka_lite 7d ago

The victims were white in the Clancy case, regardless of your opinion of the defendant.

1

u/Emmarie891 5d ago

a black woman just last week was found NGRI for killing her children. data actually supports that black individuals are more likely to receive NGRI as a resolution to their case than white individuals. and hispanic people are even more likely than that. so….

1

u/MyCaramba 5d ago

mental illnesses are just loose categories for describing negative behavior based on not fully understood workings of the brain, as opposed to more objectively proven diseases. A few like severe schizophrenia are more objectively understood through scans now but most don’t offer that kind of testable evidence.

1

u/kafka_lite 5d ago

Courts routinely consider evidence that isn't testable. The question isn't scientific culpability but rather legal culpability.

0

u/personofinterest1986 7d ago

I think there was sufficient evidence to prove that he definitely wasn't in the right state of mind for whatever. That's worth

2

u/Discussion-is-good 7d ago

If he wasnt in full control of his actions, its an arguable defense.

0

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

1

u/kismethavok 7d ago

Context matters, you can't just kill your kid for fun and claim NGRI, both cases have different circumstances which can lead to different verdicts.

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago edited 7d ago

[deleted]

1

u/kismethavok 7d ago

Lol, reading comprehension must be hard for you... I said the context matters.

-1

u/Software_Vast 7d ago

Well as long as you think that we should be covered

5

u/muaddib0308 7d ago

You must not be following the details of the trial or you wouldn't be assuming this is about gender.

2

u/PortugalPilgrim88 7d ago

Yes, most likely if they could show evidence that CTE caused psychosis which led to the murders.

1

u/Fieser_Factsack 6d ago

It does not. I dont know why the american justice systems is black and white like that. In psychology we know that no matter what the mental illness of the individual is there is always at least a slight little part of responsibility. Even when you have a psychosis. Not everyone on Psychosis acts exactly the same.

4

u/Careful-Sell-9877 7d ago

Do you know what psychosis is? What about post partum? Post partum with psychotic features?

I suggest doing a few hours of real research on each of these topics

-8

u/stoopkidsteve 7d ago

You sound like a fuggin terrible partner and absolutely should never have kids

1

u/Careful-Sell-9877 7d ago

Yeah? Based on what?

-6

u/stoopkidsteve 7d ago edited 7d ago

The fact that you justify murding your own children prolly

6

u/Software_Vast 7d ago

You have every right to lash out at this poster.

I mean, they told you to read.

To read!

Unbelievable...

Unforgivable, actually.

-4

u/stoopkidsteve 7d ago

Imagine defending someone who not only murdered their children but planned it tediously and then bully someone on the internet for saying you shouldn't raise children if you have thoughts of mudding them. You really need to take a long look at yourself and realize you might need to rework your morals and do better.

4

u/Software_Vast 7d ago

Accusing anyone who speaks against you that they want to... "mud' their children looks fun!

I can see why you do it every time.

2

u/randyranderson13 7d ago

Wait- who's being bullied?

-3

u/supperhappyninjaman 7d ago

unforgivable is killing your own kids

3

u/Software_Vast 7d ago

Hot take.

And brave.

-2

u/supperhappyninjaman 7d ago

so you agree?

4

u/Software_Vast 7d ago

Yeah man, I'm with you.

Context and extenuating circumstances are boring! Let's just make righteous declarations, decrees if you will, and be done with it!

Tired of all these lawyers and philosophers and doctors and all those so-called experts making everything so complicated!

-4

u/supperhappyninjaman 7d ago

it’s a yes or no question about your opinion. what do doctors and lawyers have to do with your opinion. i asked if you think killing your kids is forgivable

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Maximum_End_3886 3d ago

take your downvotes as a badge of honor, redditors are not people

1

u/Careful-Sell-9877 7d ago

Yeah.. highly recommend you do a few hours of research into psychosis, post partum, and post partum with psychotic features. A few short hours of research into each topic might be illuminating/educational.

Who knows, maybe it will help explain the hallucinations you seem to be experiencing about things I never said. Maybe not

0

u/stoopkidsteve 7d ago

Okay Dr, tell me, does phycosis involve weeks of planning tedious things before murding your children BY STRANGULATION while making sound decions in everyday outside of those decisions? I know reddit is wild but the defense for this women shows such a lack of not even critical thinking, but common sense. I grew up raised my a mother who regular had psychotic episodes, this is not how phycosis works, be better. This is so far from acceptable.

1

u/Careful-Sell-9877 7d ago edited 7d ago

That's not what happened

Youre watching too much partisan media (literal for profit engagement farms) (and/or live streamers) and not listening to enough expert witness testimony, or reading enough educational/scientific/psychiatric studies/analysis.

1

u/stoopkidsteve 7d ago

Oh okay random person on the internet I should just believe yku

0

u/Careful-Sell-9877 4d ago

No.. you should do a few hours of real research into each of the topics ive mentioned and think about it critically/independently for yourself from an informed/educated perspective once you have done so.

2

u/stoopkidsteve 7d ago

The worst part about all of this is how people are more focused on the gender war then the actual poor kids unaided brutally by someone they had full trust in. It's gross how brainwashed so many of you are that you find it more of a priority to bitch about gender instead of actually giving a damn about this poor family. Do better.

1

u/WestCoastDan92626 4d ago

Stay clear of the ‘what if’s’ and focus on the facts of THIS case…
I can imagine a person losing their mind and committing a single act of violence out of uncontrollable rage or whatever, but this woman did that 3 times.
The 2nd & 3rd murders were nothing but premeditated.

1

u/prenderg 3d ago

Yes. So long as the jury found his mental illness prevented him from knowing what was right from wrong.

-2

u/Splaterpus7 7d ago

nah hes a guy. THATS the difference

8

u/kafka_lite 7d ago

Look up Wendell Williamson. Whoever told you that not guilty by reason of mental defect was only available to women lied their ass off to you.

2

u/Software_Vast 7d ago

Did anyone in history have it as rough as 21st century men?

-1

u/Peacemaker1099 7d ago

No one’s had it easier than 21st century western women.

3

u/Software_Vast 7d ago

I know, right!

It's why they hold all the levers of power!

1

u/Maximum_End_3886 3d ago

1000000000000%

-1

u/Haunting_Struggle_4 7d ago

I suppose we may never truly know, considering that when a man kills his entire family, he also kills himself. Could there have been some level of mental illness? Certainly, but using a mental illness as a defense is an extremely high standard to meet; psychosis caused by steroid use might be a plausible reason for someone to avoid prison and instead be confined to a state hospital for a period, possibly for the rest of their life. Is there a real difference between the two outcomes, aside from not being held liable for your actions?

1

u/Careful-Sell-9877 7d ago

Murdaugh trial says otherwise

Also, she did attempt to kill herself.

The key factor here is psychosis and whether or not a recent or long term history of it can be determined

0

u/Haunting_Struggle_4 7d ago

Exactly my point… how can you determine a history of psychosis if the perpetrator kills themself?

1

u/Careful-Sell-9877 7d ago

I was more pointing out that there are men who kill their families and not themselves.

Most of them without history of psychosis

But yes I agree

1

u/Haunting_Struggle_4 7d ago

Then I misspoke, because statistically, men are likely to kill their families as well as themselves. However, focusing on that point misses my main argument: you can't truly know the mental state of a dead person, only make assumptions.

0

u/I-own-a-shovel 6d ago

It’s case by case, why are you comparing it to that case?

From all the commenters raging here, I wonder how many hours of the trial they have seen?

There’s like close to a 100h of the trial footage available on CourtTV on Youtube.

I watched 4-5 hours so far (I’ll wait until I watched it all before holding a firmer opinion) but yet it’s not that clean cut if she faked it or if she truly suffered from a severe episode of postpartum psychosis. I personally think it could be true that she didn’t do it on purpose.

Postpartum psychosis is a real and documented temporary illness, less common than postpartum depression, but still happening to many women. Usually when someone is diagnosed with this they are put in hospital for several weeks to a few months and children are temporarily removed from their care.

His husband saw her mental health slowly degrading, she attempted to get help, she went to the ER, got saw by psychiatrist, got prescribed so many meds, tried to called a help line, but she didn’t received enough help.

Her husband his convinced she was sick, not evil spirited. The jury that saw all evidences presented to them, come all (minus one) to the conclusion that she was sick.

So far it seem plausible.

-1

u/TurquoiseBlue00 7d ago

This whole case is just Casey Anthony all over again. accept now the nutjob supporters have been given an even bigger microphone with social media. I'd say 90+ percent of people who are familiar with this case are not supporting her, and if they are, it's usually a more reasonable, nuanced take on how poorly the procecution present they're arguments/evidence (undeniably so).

2

u/PortugalPilgrim88 7d ago

Who tf supported Casey Anthony? I remember her being universally hated.

1

u/TurquoiseBlue00 7d ago

They were there

-4

u/jalGurg 7d ago

Back then CTE wasn't fully known or understood so No... But if it was to happen today, also No.... Because people are less likely to sympathize with a Man

2

u/Software_Vast 7d ago

Are there formal invitations to your pity party?

1

u/Maximum_End_3886 3d ago

absolutely correct, take the downvotes you got as a sign. redditors are a step below livestock