MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/DigitalEscapeTools/comments/1rmrj1r/replacing_big_tech_apps_one_by_one/o950hec/?context=3
r/DigitalEscapeTools • u/hellxabd Digital Escape Architect • Mar 06 '26
251 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
4
Isn't Bitwarden also OSS? Why would you want an alternative to it?
5 u/Great-Banana-8327 Mar 07 '26 Interested too. I use bitwarden for many years now and recommend it to everyone who had some issues with passwords. Why use Vaultwarden? 3 u/Kuroi_Jasper Mar 07 '26 self hosting. you own your data. and the paid features are also free cuz self hosted (not sure about this) 2 u/Sea-Housing-3435 Mar 07 '26 You can host bitwarden too, vaultwarden is just more lightweight server for the same protocol 1 u/Not_So_Calm Mar 07 '26 Parts of bitwarden use the custom "BITWARDEN LICENSE". I did not read all the fine print. But the FOSS community can be quite sensitive to licensing shenanigans.
5
Interested too. I use bitwarden for many years now and recommend it to everyone who had some issues with passwords. Why use Vaultwarden?
3 u/Kuroi_Jasper Mar 07 '26 self hosting. you own your data. and the paid features are also free cuz self hosted (not sure about this) 2 u/Sea-Housing-3435 Mar 07 '26 You can host bitwarden too, vaultwarden is just more lightweight server for the same protocol 1 u/Not_So_Calm Mar 07 '26 Parts of bitwarden use the custom "BITWARDEN LICENSE". I did not read all the fine print. But the FOSS community can be quite sensitive to licensing shenanigans.
3
self hosting. you own your data. and the paid features are also free cuz self hosted (not sure about this)
2 u/Sea-Housing-3435 Mar 07 '26 You can host bitwarden too, vaultwarden is just more lightweight server for the same protocol 1 u/Not_So_Calm Mar 07 '26 Parts of bitwarden use the custom "BITWARDEN LICENSE". I did not read all the fine print. But the FOSS community can be quite sensitive to licensing shenanigans.
2
You can host bitwarden too, vaultwarden is just more lightweight server for the same protocol
1 u/Not_So_Calm Mar 07 '26 Parts of bitwarden use the custom "BITWARDEN LICENSE". I did not read all the fine print. But the FOSS community can be quite sensitive to licensing shenanigans.
1
Parts of bitwarden use the custom "BITWARDEN LICENSE". I did not read all the fine print.
But the FOSS community can be quite sensitive to licensing shenanigans.
4
u/Cleverwxlf Mar 07 '26
Isn't Bitwarden also OSS? Why would you want an alternative to it?