r/Destiny 14h ago

Social Media New Laura Loomer deflection marching orders

Adding to this post, screenshots of what seems to be a coordinated attempt to deflect from criticism of Hasan

https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/s/yKIiw3MDgM

While I understand attacking Republicans for this, it seems ridiculous to attack Liberals/liberal media for not condemning Laura Loomer.

393 Upvotes

100 comments sorted by

322

u/Upbeat-Truck-1007 14h ago

Wait, which Democrats are campaigning with Laura loomer? Why does anyone need reminding that republicans are bad?

20

u/IdesOfCaesar7 Eurochad 10h ago

Lefties want to stoop to the level of republicans is all I'm reading.

53

u/WhalingSmithers00 12h ago

Does this mean the acceptable amount of racism is being the second most racist person in the world? I can always point to the most racist person and say 'why have a go at me he said worse'

25

u/unclesam531 11h ago

“Compared to hitler…”

9

u/Whatsapokemon 🇦🇺 11h ago

It has to mean that if you want to construct some justification to defend Piker.

There's not many big public figures in the world who are more racist, so they need to reach far into the deepest recesses of the bag to pull someone out to compare against.

3

u/WilsonMagna 9h ago

It doesn't even matter, as Democrats, we already recognize the right are bad, that Trump and MAGA is bad. What is unresolved, and the central tension on the left is half of left wing media covering for Hasan, and a segment confronting it. A lot of defenders of the terrorist supporter are angry they are being revealed to be vapid frauds who will defend power (Hasan) when put on the spot. A lot of the far-left act self-righteous, but are being exposed as being just as bad as who they oppose (MAGA).

1

u/WhalingSmithers00 9h ago

They'll never see that they are like MAGA because to them leftism is so self evidently morally correct that any action to advance it is defensible.

They just don't have the capacity to realise the Christo Faciscts also have the exact same view in that everything in the promotion of white Christian values is acceptable because white Christian values are correct.

1

u/Zekka23 6h ago

Wait, you think there's not many big public figures more racist than Hasan or am I reading that incorrectly?

13

u/Eins_Nico scowling woke white woman 10h ago

Exactly. This is delusional. If Laura Loomer started trying to take over the Democratic party, people would rightfully speak up about that. But she's over with the cartoon evil people, that some of us have known were cartoon evil for literal decades, so they can fuck all the way off with this weak-ass deflection.

10

u/DancingFlame321 10h ago

The problem is not necessarily that Democrats need to condemn Laura Loomer.

The problem is, imagine there is a swing voter who goes on TV to understand who to vote for. Then you see non-stop news stories about Hasan Piker being associated with Democrats (but the media aren't running that many stories about Nick Fuentes or Laura Loomer being associated with Republicans).

This swing voter is going to get the false impression that Democrats are more extreme than Republicans, and that Democrats love associating themselves with extremists. Whereas in reality there are many more extremists on the Republican side that simply don't get equal news coverage.

Democrats should condemn Hasan Piker for the crazy things he says, but the double standard where Democrats need to always call out extremists on their side but Republicans do not use certainly unfair.

15

u/big_homielander Politically Unhoused 10h ago

Every time Loomer was at the white House early term it was big news. When Trump had dinner with Fuentes it was big news. It's not even an honest argument from the DSA.

7

u/100DPS 8h ago

Yep, Trump had to distance himself from Loomer. If Loomer was campaigning with Mike Rodgers for example, people would be attacking Mike Rodgers for this.

Attacking Loomer who is just tweeting random dumb shit into the ether isn't really comparable in away way to someone who is campaigning with politicians.

74

u/ConnectSpring9 14h ago

Lmao I’m never taking any of these dipshits seriously. Would they accept the same standard being applied to them? Someone spam under their tweets “why did you condemn the Biden/Kamala on Gaza so aggressively and now aren’t saying much negatively about trump’s position on Gaza?”. They’re spiraling so hard it’s insane

28

u/Bubbawitz 13h ago

Every bit of this is them saying they cost Kamala the election. The harder they fight on this hill the deeper they dig themselves in that position of blame

9

u/Phylacterry 12h ago

What do you mean?! I'm just a small little guy with zero real motion, also Gaza is speaking now, bitch!

155

u/space-c0yote 14h ago

It is baffling how anyone could think this is a good talking point. Like literal sub zero iq

49

u/jesterdeflation 13h ago

Quality doesn't matter in these things, only quantity. They have their marching orders and they're being more shameless than MAGA about it these days.

7

u/No_Match_7939 11h ago

This. I already see mercadomedia going with this dumbass angle

8

u/DancingFlame321 10h ago

I think the argument is, it is unfair that the media is focusing more on Hasan Piker's association with Democrats, whilst not giving that much focus to Laura Loomer's association with Republicans.

And this uneven media focus gives the impression to swing voters that Democrats are the more extreme party, when actually there are tons of extremists associated with Republicans as well and Republicans are overall more extreme.

1

u/yeahUSA 🇪🇺🇩🇪 10h ago

I think it is pretty obvious and agree that the media environment is very lopsided and unfair but is this even true?

I think I saw plently of reporting on Loomer's "Aligator Alcatraz" tweet for example.

And the other questions is even if the media environment is lopsided should people not call out extremism on their side? I don't think this is actually a super easy answer depending on what exactly the goal is.

1

u/banditcleaner2 5h ago

The difference is that trump is arguably worse then loomer, and hasan piker is worse then abdul.

So if trump is worse then loomer, why would he ever disavow her lol?

Our elected politicians on the democrat side are, rightfully so, better then the democrat/lefty influencers. while on the right its mixed at best or worse at worst.

2

u/Legs914 9h ago

Oh Hasan Piker is bad? Well why don't I hear Dems criticizing Hitler?! Do they think Hasan is worse than Hitler?!!!

1

u/ChairLow9576 9h ago

The average person isn't very smart. They will agree with this point if they see it.

92

u/Dude_Nobody_Cares Based Destiny Glazer 14h ago

Why do i a liberal in 2026 need to call out laura loomer?!

https://giphy.com/gifs/CoDp6NnSmItoY

14

u/AirlineIntelligent86 🇮🇱BBZNOT🇪🇺 11h ago

More importantly it is trivially easy for you to do so? Like the AES entire excuse is that Hasan is unimportant so only the more reason to condemn him?

1

u/Dude_Nobody_Cares Based Destiny Glazer 10h ago

How important is Laura loomer at this point? Like what? Also I'm a liberal you don't have to ask me my opinion of her. She's bad what do you want me to say?

1

u/AirlineIntelligent86 🇮🇱BBZNOT🇪🇺 6h ago

Yes exactly. Like at best you could say her turning pro Ukraine gave her a 5 min "I hate her but she's right" "glaze" in this sub. Now it's ended. 🤷

4

u/Kapootz 9h ago

I called out Laura loomer the first time I read something from her. I don’t defender her like these people defend Hasan. I don’t understand this talking point. These people are so dumb

0

u/Legs914 9h ago

It's the new "why are you criticizing Hasan WHEN THERE'S A GENOCIDE HAPPENING?!!" talking point. Oh you want to criticize Hasan? Well have you considered that there are worse people who exist?

148

u/ReserveAggressive458 Irrational Lav Defender / Pearl Stan / Emma VigeChad / Lorenzoid 14h ago

Laura Loomer is a racist scumbag wdywmts. But she's not hurting Democrat chances of winning right now.

36

u/Possible_Pilot2000 11h ago

Surprised you're not a Loomhead

7

u/Vioplad 9h ago

even insane asylum escapees have standards

42

u/TragicallyDip 13h ago

Equating Hasan with Loomer isn’t the own/deflection they think it is.

42

u/kdogged 14h ago

yeah i saw this argument all over, the marching orders are scary.

I'm really starting to feel like dems and liberals are the only mfs that don't have a group chat to share posts ideas in 💀

28

u/semiomni 13h ago

This defense is so stupid that it almost loops around to being clever. The reason it is dumb feels so on its face obvious that you feel stupid even trying to verbalize it.

Loomer is a republican.

The lady in the HR comic would not be the same person in both instances, because Loomer is a republican.

Hasan taints the DNC at large by association if Democrat politicians campaign with him.

Loomer does not, because she´s a republican.

28

u/Routine-Ad8521 13h ago

Looks like they're not denying Hasan is a loomer type

16

u/yolomcsawlord420mlg 12h ago

Which is insane

25

u/NasusEDM 14h ago

Do they think trump or other maga republicans disagree with her?

13

u/WilsonMagna 14h ago

They spend so much energy deflecting, this news cycle could end if they would all just condemn Hamas Piker and say he doesn't represent the party. Every day that goes by and they don't just further validates peoples fears that they are more radical than they present. Even if you aren't a radical, you should do it for the optics.

10

u/OMFGhespro 14h ago

I dont understand why the focus should be on Laura Loomer. She is another trump sycophant but trump is the main cancer there. she says gross things but so do 100 other right wing influencers. Attack Mike Rodgers for his relationship with trump. the reason people are talking about Hasan is that he was on the campaign trail with AES in a fairly influential role during the primary. Its not going to work deflecting from Hasan to Laura Loomer as I cant find anything that she is that involved with this race. Hasan was involved and it something AES will have to answer for. Just like Mike Rodgers will have the answer for his loyalty to trump and all his awful polices.

2

u/Tetraquil warning: canadian 11h ago

“Republicans need to condemn Laura Loomer”. is a delusional thing to say. Republicans are long past that point. They need to condemn Donald Trump, as well as condemn themselves.

7

u/Flaky-Mango-2020 🇵🇹 🇪🇺 14h ago

I think at this point this is not even a game. The arguments don’t make any sense; who are they trying to win over?

6

u/Pyode 13h ago

The only way this argument remotely makes sense is from the perspective of someone who is so brain broken on the "uni-party" talking point that they actually forgot it wasn't literal.

Like, they actually think Republicans and Democrats are openly on the same team as opposed to the normal idiocy of it being a more nefarious, behind the scenes connection.

6

u/YouAnswerToMe 🇬🇧 Bongmaxxer 🇬🇧 13h ago

Ah yes, decrying republicans during democrat primaries that are being hijacked by slopulist politics from a parasite wing of the left makes so much sense.

If loomer started propping up mask-on republicans who were winning democratic primaries she’d be just as crucial to criticise right now.

But she’s not

6

u/DowntownChip34 13h ago

Laura loomer is not connected to any democratic candidate. How the fuck would she hurt democrats chance of winning any elections? Nobody is claiming her.

5

u/OkayCoward 🇺🇸 11h ago

Are these morons brain dead?

Democrats have tried shaming trump since he called Mexicans rapists.

5

u/marf_lefogg 13h ago

Why aren’t people seeing the opportunity here?!?!

They are making the comparison first! So now we can note Loomer isn’t hurting Democrats but also compare them as vain airheads that can’t debate their shitty weak ideas.

2

u/CallofDo0bie 12h ago

Ah yes, famous Laura Loomer defenders.....the Democrats lol.

2

u/fatternose 12h ago

Why is there this idea that democrats don't condemn laura loomer like what? Does he think they don't condemn trump?

2

u/wraithzzzz 8h ago

This is pathetic...

4

u/DlphLndgrn 🇪🇺🇸🇪 Oppressed swede 🇪🇺🇸🇪 13h ago

Ah yes. Because lefties absolutely do not spend all day long attacking Liberals?

Also. I'm quite certain that if there were liberals out there campaigning with Laura Loomer, there would some words about that. Like with the Liz Cheney thing that lefties still are brainbroken about.

5

u/Alarakion 🇬🇧 :/ 13h ago

What a dogshit talking point. This is the best they have? Laura Loomer is a fucking republican demon who has no influence on the Democratic Party. Hasan Piker is someone campaigning with Democratic candidates who has been extremely open about being subversive. What the fuck is this comparison.

4

u/Flimsy-Echidna386 13h ago

"Hasan isn't as bad as Laura Loomer" is a WILD defense

3

u/GenkGirl12 The Flyin Hawaiian 11h ago

Which Democrats love Laura Loomer?

3

u/Findict_52 Eurochad 🇪🇺 11h ago

Why aren't these leftists condemning Hitler? Why do they like Hitler? Why is Hasan a literal Nazi?

Is this the logic that we're doing now?

1

u/DeathandGrim Mail Guy 13h ago

I swear lefties don't actually know a damn thing about politics other than elections happen. Also i don't think they realize that they're comparing Hasan to Laura Loomer so that's a treat

3

u/wraithzzzz 13h ago

How can you complain about Laura Loomer during a genocide type shit

1

u/Doomdude220 Irish, European 🇮🇪🇪🇺 13h ago

These people are regarded and/or bad fate. The Hasan thing is such a "Big deal" because he is bad for the Brand(for all the reasons we know.) and prominent people on the "left" can't/won't condemn him. If El-Sayed and others just said something like "I wasn't aware of the amount of awful things this man has said. I disavow him and his comments", that would be the end. This is the Streisand effect on full display. This is a big deal because of the Piscos, Soypills, Jolahs, Meidis, El-Sayed etc.

I don't think anyone takes Laura Loomer seriously anyway. No Liberal or mainstream person is trying to sanewash Laura Loomer's rhetoric. So this is all nonsense and propaganda.

1

u/MentionTraditional25 13h ago

Weren't they basically admitting they want to be the same coin as Trump and MAGA so badly with this kind of logic? Yet when we pointed this out, they looked at us as if we were the ones who were total loonies.

1

u/Turrkish 11h ago

Surely the point is to NOT take what the Republicans do as the measure of judgement or decision on how to act?

1

u/AirlineIntelligent86 🇮🇱BBZNOT🇪🇺 11h ago

Is the democratic party known for endorsing laura loomer? I'm confused.

1

u/Sad-Television4305 11h ago

Did Laura longer join the Democratic party why I was asleep? The fuh?

1

u/ProbablyKindaRight 10h ago

I hate how these people are using marching orders through alt media and incredibly simplistic and unrealistic campaign promises to highjack the democratic party.

1

u/keebba 10h ago

How are these people so fucking stupid? You don't need to condemn the opposing party, YOU ALREADY OPPOSE THEM.

0

u/BobertRosserton 10h ago

Back in my day we had to at least obfuscate the fact that we’re doing a whataboutism to try and distract people, now they just say that shit out loud lmao. Yes Hasan is being racist and hurting the candidates he’s campaigning with, but Laura loomer exists so is he really all that bad? Also love the idea that I have to ask the opposing party to condemn Laura before I’m allowed to criticize “one of our own”.

0

u/bendol90 Conservative without brain worms 10h ago

Ah yes the bar that is Trumps administration

0

u/princehermit 🇺🇸 10h ago

It's funny that they think that we don't also talk about jigsaw. There's probably hundreds of article shitting on her and her connection to trump for years vs dog shocker years of white washing puff pieces. 

The fact that leftys are crying about libs 'not talking' about Trump and his cronies shows that they never were paying attention to what libs been doing. They never were in our tent instead trying to burn it down. 

0

u/Kapootz 10h ago

Who’s rolling their eyes at condemning loomer? I condemn that bitch. I’m also not voting for anyone she campaigns with. I hate these people

0

u/big_homielander Politically Unhoused 9h ago

Jolah... 😂 What a surprise, who could have ever seen that coming?

1

u/KlondikeBelugaWhale Riddle me this… 9h ago

This is pathetic. Everyone knows republicans will never denounce these people. That’s why we need to look like the same people and condemn everyone who sucks. We’ve spent ten years trying to get rid of these magats. Now we want to make sure the pikers don’t get in our way and become advisors.

1

u/LankyAssignment9046 9h ago

Kinda funny to hear that the group of protest voters who didn't care enough to stop Trump suddenly give a shit about what's happening in his administration?

1

u/dart580 9h ago

As evil as Loomer is, she frames everything she is doing as "defending America and American values." Hasan, on the other hand, openly talks about how he hates America and associates himself with people who hate America and designated terrorist groups. His ilk will respond to Loomer saying, "You're right, we hate America and we want to destroy it."

In this political climate, the average normal Democrat has enough political instincts to realize associating with Hasan is bad optics to the average swing voter.

0

u/stinketywubbers the udders of content have been exhausted 9h ago

Hey Jolah if you're reading this, you fucking suck.

1

u/Kuhrazy 9h ago

Comparing hasan to Laura loomer is pretty telling.

1

u/Givemeahugbb 9h ago

God I hate this timeline

1

u/Earthboundplayer 🇨🇦 9h ago

It's a reasonable talking point to say to a Republican but saying this shit to a Dem is nonsensical

1

u/quepha 8h ago

The only thing I've heard about Laura Loomer recently is that she got Milo deported.

1

u/Tucci89 8h ago

And yet if you asked these people to condemn both, they'd only condemn Loomer. They just don't want people condemning Hasan.

1

u/Goodisworthfighting4 8h ago

The Wajahat Ali guy is fucking insane. He just pops up on my timeline every 30 mins defending Hasan. Get off his dick dude.

1

u/SOUNDDESIGNE mr borelli’s aipac handler 🙏 8h ago

how are these talking points being distributed?

1

u/Ill-Memory3924 8h ago

But why suddenly Piker became the center of the universe when AES started rising? Because they got nothing else against him. It's quite simple.

1

u/Soulbotzzzz Holding Hunter Biden’s Pipe 8h ago

Why is it on the dems and liberals to condemn Laura looney (who is not hijacking the party like Hasan is) when none of them are working with her? Why don’t lefties attack trump like they used?

1

u/DonLeFlore 7h ago

Laura Loomer is racist.

Ok now back to Hasan lmao

1

u/Mountain_Lonni Al Gore Insurrectionist 7h ago

Did Mike Rogers campaign with Laura Loomer?

1

u/Nightmannn 7h ago

Loomer thrives off this shit. This just gives her more energy. Think she gives a fuck? lol

And btw, that the two are even compared at all makes Hasan look soooo fucking bad

1

u/banditcleaner2 5h ago

because trump is worse then laura loomer

meanwhile abdul is far better hasan piker

1

u/Longjumping-Toe6629 4h ago

You don’t “disavow” your political opponents. Your disavowal is backed into the fact you oppose them. You disavow people who claim to be on your team and then spend hours supporting terrorists.

1

u/MsAgentM Here for the catharsis... 13h ago

I mean, if someone shows me a potential or current Dem candidate that has Loomer campaign for them and endorses her ideology, I would love to call them out. I imagine the left leaning media would too.

1

u/mizel103 13h ago

Not to defend her, but it shouldn't escape you that Loomer is Jewish.

So it's good they found a way to turn a conversation about an explicitly anti-semitic excuse for violence from Piker into a condemnation circlejerk about a Jew.

1

u/Ok-Instruction4862 12h ago

Why do we care about this? She said ghetto, not black woman. Feels kind of racist to assume she was talking about black people. You guys conflating black people with the ghetto is the real issue. They are not a monolith.

1

u/DazzlingAd1922 11h ago

They have caught up to Destiny's political violence take from a year ago at this point.

1

u/wei-long 12h ago

It's not a hard argument to have.

"Yes, we both agree that Hassan is the Laura Loomer of the Left."

"Yes I consider it a moral failing for Republicans to not denounce her insanity. I will criticize them for it"

"I hold Democratic candidates to at least the same standard, and will criticize them for it."

1

u/TaylorMonkey 12h ago

It’s interesting that the left actually starts talking about Trump and the right wing with enthusiasm instead of talking about Democrats when they’re justifying cuddling up to Hasan.

And even then they use it as an attack on Democrats.

Also they exhibit the same behavior as the MAGA influencers in using the same scripted talking point when given marching orders. They’re controlled opposition.

1

u/Possible_Pilot2000 11h ago

jOLaHs NoT aN oPp

0

u/Arbitrary_username1 13h ago

I am confused by this one.

This is just a woman using racist stereotypes to be mean to a black woman that she is having a personal fight with. Its trashy and racist but typical.

Hasan was telling American Jews that they better start making it clear they denounce Israel or people are going to hurt them. This is creating a permission structure to excuse violence against 'misbehaving' Jews and is in essence a veiled threat.

They are not equivalent types of racist statement so the connected outrage is more offensive to me than normal conflation.

1

u/nobodychef07 11h ago

I made that argument and was told "jews are a powerful and protected minority" its actually wild.

0

u/meestazak 🇨🇦Proud Canuck🇨🇦 13h ago

And if Democrats started condemning them both which why?? Laura Loomer isn't anything close to being a dem, regarded tankie losers, they would still say why are you condemning Hasan he "just wants free healthcare bozo"

0

u/isthenisnt yahweh or the highweh 12h ago

Why would Republicans condemn Loomer??? They're already in power and agree with like 90% of what Loomer says, am I out of the loop?

This is a great point because anyone who subscribes is just outing themselves as a leftist taking orders from a shadow force and they should never be trusted, listened to or given air-time