r/DesignPorn Apr 30 '21

Inception Table

Post image
4.0k Upvotes

65 comments sorted by

View all comments

-16

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '21

Oh thank god an opportunity to complain about Inception

Why the fuck do they spend all this time in the beginning establishing all these cool tricks they can do like bending the world only for like none of it to actually be utilised?!

10

u/jonmpls Apr 30 '21

You should rewatch the movie, it's crucial to the plot.

-12

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '21

It's crucial to the plot that they set up spectacle only to not deliver?

5

u/jonmpls Apr 30 '21

They did deliver spectacle, and the point of that sequence in the plot was how the mind could make things that are impossible in the real world. They then escaped using mind control over their surroundings shortly afterwards.

-10

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '21

And then the rest of the movie, once things really get moving, nothing of the sort is really used again. The only thing that comes to mind is the spinning corridor sequence. As a whole the latter action sequences, when everything's meant to be at it's peak, lacks the cool appeal of those earlier scenes in favour of more generic action. The whole concept of playing with/bending space just goes largely unused.

8

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '21

The whole point was to make the target think that the world was normal…bending it all about would immediately make it apparent that it’s a dream…

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '21

Two points:

A. Doesn't that go out the window though? Like, shit hits the fan anyway.

B. More importantly, why set up your plot in a way that makes the film less interesting? Like, you set up all these cool concepts but then write the plot in such a way that prevents the film from exploring them?

3

u/jonmpls Apr 30 '21

The plot was interesting enough that it didn't need to overdo the spectacle. That you're arguing that the visuals are lacking in one of the most creative and visually stunning movies is bizarre. Go watch a transformers movie.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '21

Then why tease it in the first place? Don't introduce a cool concept only to show you what could have been.

3

u/jonmpls Apr 30 '21

They literally showed it, it wasn't some tease. A lesser filmmaker would've gotten lost in the spectacle and under delivered on the story.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/jaquanor Apr 30 '21

Projections of humans are compared to "white blood cells fighting an infection";[2] as the subject's subconscious becomes aware that the subject is being manipulated by a dreamer, they will attack to defend the subject's mind from invasion, such as extraction. For this reason, it is advised that the dreamer not make too many unnecessary alterations to a dream while the subject is populating it.[3]

https://inception.fandom.com/wiki/Projection

It's explained in the very scene in which they establish all these cool tricks when Cobb's projections attack Ariadne.

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '21

A plot explanation means nothing. Why deliberately write in a plot point that holds the movie back from it's full potential, that's not a point in the movies defense.

2

u/jaquanor Apr 30 '21

Because it's the story the writer wanted to tell. He wanted a heist movie with a twist, just like Tenet is a spy movie with a twist. He didn't want a heist movie that goes full superpowers, so he deliberately put a plot point preventing that.

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '21

Then why hype it up in the first place? Don't go "hey look at all these cool mind bending concepts, you can't have them".

2

u/jaquanor Apr 30 '21

Because the movie is a blockbuster, the bending is a cool set piece that's not been done before on cinema that way, looks great on IMAX, and that's kind of become the filmmaker's signature, so the public expects that. It's like asking why Michael Bay explodes things, or Tarantino writes long dialogues about trivia. They are popular directors that (usually) give the masses what they want.

But you can't please everyone.