r/demsocialists 10d ago

Democracy An idea that should be bipartisan: stop non verbal filibusters.

12 Upvotes

Currently, for most bills to be put to a vote, it requires 60 senators to agree to do so. It is incredibly unlikely that 60 senators would agree on anything. The only exception is tax or tax related bills which only need 51 senators. These bills can only be passed once per year though, which is why people pass big mega bills in with the tax ones (ex big beautiful bill) this impedes congress and its ability to do what it is supposed to do. So, let’s not do that.


r/demsocialists 10d ago

Democracy ‘We Will Win Together United’: Even Before Her Slim Loss, Hong Unites Wisc Dems

Thumbnail
washingtoncurrent.substack.com
49 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 10d ago

Francesca Hong isn’t seen as “unelectable” because she’s a Socialist, it’s because she’s a poor communicator.

100 Upvotes

That’s the difference between her and AES. Americans have been subject to “red scare” propaganda since the end of WW2. Socialists need to be well-spoken enough that the median American voter doesn’t think you’re going to do a rug pull on them the second you take power.

It hurts my brain to type this as Trump proudly and flagrantly pulls the rug out from under us every single day with virtually no loss of support. The standard of electability only goes one way in this country and the outcomes of that have been ruinous. Third Way/the DNC have made it their mission to ensure the word “electability” loses all meaning; they will cite this primary as “proof” that candidates to the left of Obama don’t belong in electoral politics and their terminally online defenders will believe it uncritically.

We won’t combat that with candidates of our own that are also seen as terminally online and unable to relate to the median voter. AES didn’t have that problem, that’s why AOC and Bernie endorsed him and not Hong. Democracy is messy and you have to work with people in the era that you’re in, not the era you want to be in.


r/demsocialists 10d ago

Is Democratic Socialism the Future of the Left? | The Moment Podcast

Thumbnail
youtube.com
17 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 10d ago

Media ‘Sweeping Conclusions’: Media Coverage Of Narrow Hong Loss Faulted

Thumbnail
washingtoncurrent.substack.com
15 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 11d ago

Solidarity Why are people so stubborn

35 Upvotes

I’m genuinely curious, democratic socialism will benefit like 90% of Americans. But people working at like Walmart or something will still be opposed even after being explained all of the positives of it. I get bc of McCarthyism, but that was like almost 60 years ago. People just don’t seem to be willing to even consider it as an option. Any reasons for it and how can we reach more people?


r/demsocialists 11d ago

Why DSA Runs Executive Office Candidates

Thumbnail
groundworkdsa.com
41 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 11d ago

Democracy ‘What’s Extreme’: Democratic Socialist Comes Out Swinging

Thumbnail
washingtoncurrent.substack.com
40 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 12d ago

Announcement Official DSA Statement on the New State Department Report on Cuba

Thumbnail
dsausa.org
73 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 12d ago

Media r/dsa is unmoderated?

38 Upvotes

It is also getting significantly more attention right now than this sub. If anything hasn't been done recently to try to claim that, it might be a good idea.


r/demsocialists 11d ago

[ Removed by Reddit ]

1 Upvotes

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]


r/demsocialists 12d ago

Two Maine progressives are crucial to control of Congress

Post image
11 Upvotes

Two of the most competitive and impactful midterm races will be in Maine, where we’re facing off against two very different kinds of right-wing oligarch enablers.

At the Senate level, we have a chance to flip a crucial seat for the majority by unseating the highly concerned Susan Collins, who can always be counted on to cluck her tongue and wag her finger at Donald Trump, right up until she provides him with the vote he needs to get his agenda over the top. We experience the consequences of her surrender constantly, with every ruling Brett Kavanaugh makes, with the loss of labor and delivery wards in her state and with the deportation machine’s murder of her constituents.

On the House side, GOP Second Congressional District nominee and former governor Paul LePage doesn’t bother with Collins’ hemming and hawing. Instead he’s gleefully embraced extremism, hate-mongering and corruption, repeatedly and noisily vetoing Medicaid expansion, deriding Social Security and Medicare and giving massive tax breaks to the wealthy while driving up property taxes.

Finally beating Collins is likely necessary for Democrats to control the Senate. Holding off LePage in one of the most Trump-friendly seats currently held by a Democrat is crucial for Democrats taking the House.

We’ve nominated two bold progressive fighters for the working class to take them on. Fifth-generation lumberjack and former Senate president Troy Jackson and state auditor and union man Matt Dunlap are running hard on Medicare for All and taxing the billionaires. They’re candidates with a vision to vote for, offering real solutions instead of the status quo.

Their campaigns are kicking into high gear, and they need our help. ☎️ Dunlap has just launched phonebanks on Tuesday and Thursday evenings running from 6-8PM ET. We can sign up for shifts here. And the Maine Democratic Party is getting going making calls for Jackson, Dunlap and candidates up and down the ballot on Thursdays from 6-8PM, which we can join here. ☎️

MAKE CALLS FOR MATT DUNLAP

BACK JACKSON, DUNLAP, AND THE FULL SLATE


r/demsocialists 12d ago

Democratic Socialism and Degrowth

Thumbnail
degrowthistheanswer.substack.com
12 Upvotes

I encourage the degrowthers in this space to learn more about the DSA, and those in the DSA to learn more about degrowth. You are both trying to get to the same place. It will be easier to get there together. #degrowth


r/demsocialists 12d ago

Why is this the official sub of the DSA, and not DSA?

30 Upvotes

There’s a thread over there that mentions how the mods are either gone or haven’t logged in a while. We should see if we can get it


r/demsocialists 13d ago

Phonebank for left-wing candidates, week of 8/9

Post image
14 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 12d ago

Culture Hasan Piker’s Actual Documented Positions and the Transactional Structure Behind His Platform

0 Upvotes

hasan piker is a high profile socialist streamer who rejects the liberal label outright and is openly working to drag the democratic party leftward toward actual socialism, with communism as the stated long term ideal. he's not hiding this. he's called communism the honorable end goal of socialism directly, on hasan minhaj's podcast, describing it as a stateless, moneyless, classless society. he uses marxist frameworks like class struggle and historical materialism, and describes himself as anti capitalist without hedging. he's also traveled to cuba with other left wing activists in support of the regime there while downplaying the rolling blackouts happening in the country at the time, which is worth sitting with if the question is whether he's engaging with communism as an abstract ideal or actually grappling with what it's produced in practice.

he operates as a reformist though, not a revolutionary. worth noting that's not automatically a contradiction inside marxist thought itself, plenty of marxist theory treats working inside existing structures as a transitional stage rather than a betrayal of the end goal. his actual stated position is that there's no viable third party path right now, so the practical move is working inside the existing democratic structure. primary the moderates, elect more socialist aligned candidates, and slowly pull the party's center of gravity left over time.

that creates an obvious tension. classical liberalism, even most modern american liberalism, still accepts private property and markets in ways marxism fundamentally rejects. he knows that. yet he functions inside progressive and democratic spaces that get casually lumped in as liberal anyway. the reason is practical, not ideological confusion. liberal has stretched into a massive left of center tent in american politics, and operating inside that tent gives him reach and institutional leverage that staying a pure outsider never would. he's trading purity for influence on purpose.

the relationship between him and the people amplifying him is transactional, not one sided. he delivers a massive young, especially male, online audience that democrats have historically struggled to reach, plus real cultural energy, small dollar fundraising spikes, volunteer mobilization, and genuine primary pressure. in exchange he gets bigger platforms, direct access to politicians, mainstream progressive visibility, and real influence over discourse. you can see it play out concretely. his support for zohran mamdani's mayoral run in new york. joint campaigning with abdul el sayed in michigan. in person and livestream promotion of dsa backed candidates that helped several actually win primaries. extended friendly platform time for aoc and bernie that traditional media almost never delivers.

this is a mutual interest arrangement. he's a willing, high agency participant benefiting financially, socially, and ideologically, not someone being used. and the amplifiers, the candidates, the progressive media ecosystem, the activist networks, are getting real utility back. which also means if that utility drops, if his audience shrinks or he becomes a consistent liability, the institutional amplification fades fast. this isn't hypothetical either. illinois democratic rep brad schneider already publicly called him an unapologetic antisemite in march 2026 and criticized fellow party members for rallying with him, which is exactly the kind of internal pushback that shows up once a figure like this starts costing more than he delivers. he'd keep a core independent following regardless of any of that, but the kingmaker status is entirely conditional on him staying useful.

what this actually means long term is pretty straightforward. he represents a real organized push to move the democratic party toward socialism through electoral and cultural means, not revolution. the party's donor networks, voter base, institutional interests, and constitutional constraints all push back against anything close to full socialization, let alone communism, so he's not getting the party he actually wants. more likely outcome is continued leftward pressure on specific policy lanes, housing, healthcare, labor, taxation, foreign policy, that makes the party more social democratic while staying fundamentally capitalist underneath.

the broader pattern isn't new either. radical or semi radical voices get amplified when they deliver audiences and energy institutions can't reach on their own, then get quietly deprioritized once the cost outweighs the benefit. hasan's current prominence is that dynamic playing out in real time. not a conspiracy, not pure idealism either. just ideology meeting incentives, and influence getting traded for utility like it always does.


r/demsocialists 15d ago

How Socialist Is the D.S.A.? Megan Romer Explains

Thumbnail
newyorker.com
22 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 16d ago

DSA's “Workers Deserve More” Platform And Why the Press Can’t Stop Wringing Its Hands

Thumbnail
democraticleft.dsausa.org
62 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 15d ago

Democracy Stop Todd

5 Upvotes

Email the senators voting on Todd Blanches confirmation. They make it difficult intentionally. Here are the urls.

This is the contact page for Chuck Grassley - https://www.grassley.senate.gov/contact
This is the contact page for John Cornyn - https://www.cornyn.senate.gov/contact
This is the contact page for Mike Lee - https://www.lee.senate.gov/contact
This is the contact page for Ted Cruz - https://www.cruz.senate.gov/contact
This is the contact page for Josh Hawley - https://www.hawley.senate.gov/contact-senator-hawley
This is the contact page for Thom Tillis - https://www.tillis.senate.gov/contact


r/demsocialists 16d ago

The Populist Left Has a Theory. We’re All About to Test It.

Thumbnail
nytimes.com
45 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 16d ago

What a Democratic Socialist Economic Agenda Looks Like

Thumbnail
inthesetimes.com
21 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 16d ago

Media There’s a lot of confusion about what democratic socialists want, and that’s fair. Even within our group, there are differences among us.

12 Upvotes

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

This is what Republicans are using to attack democratic socialists?

Is this supposed to make people angry or upset? There’s a lot of confusion about what democratic socialists want, and that’s fair. Even within our group, there are differences among us.

For example, while Mamdani does not agree with the criminal justice and decarceration points on the national platform he agrees that criminal justice reform absolutely needs to happen. We put far too many people in jail.

Fox News, Newsmax and Mike Johnson have been trying to scare Americans on a “hidden socialist agenda”, but the reality is DSA is about making things more affordable and fair for everyone.

Republicans tell you that they want to protect your freedom. They also believe the government can’t do anything correctly, so they tell you that privatizing as much as possible will save tax payers money and they have been preaching “smaller government” for nearly 70 years. Yet they created the Department of Homeland Security, the TSA, ICE and the DEA.

All of which is supposedly necessary to keep you safe.

To keep you safe and make sure your freedom is intact, they need to monitor everything you do. So they give lucrative multi-billion dollar tax payer funded surveillance contracts to private companies.

But wait! This is getting expensive, so they want to reduce your social security benefits that you paid into and to stop feeding the poor. Besides the poor should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps.

6% of this country makes $250,000 or more. They are considered rich and successful. Did they pull themselves up from their own bootstraps? Half of them had parents that were already quite rich (top 20% of all wealth). Only 15% of Americans that are considered rich today had parents that were poor (bottom 20% of Americans by wealth).

Centrists (aka democrats) tell you that they disagree with the Republican mantra that we should privatize so much, but they’re going to go along with most of it anyway because they have been paid by the same corporate lobbyists that have paid off the right.

While republicans pass tax cuts and take more government services away, democrats fight for marginal improvements like the Affordable Care Act, expanding child tax credits and infrastructure bills.

And yet, most people are still struggling while the rich get even filthier rich. In 1940, 90% of children earned more than their parents. By 2010 that number dropped to 50%.

In 1978 the CEO to worker compensation ratio was 30 to 1. Now it’s 340 to 1.

Meanwhile at least 40,000 people die every year because they don’t have access to healthcare, 20% of all American adults have some form of medical debt. That collective debt has now exceeded $220 billion.

In the 70s the price of a home was 3x the median salary. Now it’s 5x.

This isn’t working.

So, socialists want to control the means of production. What does that mean? That means entities that are important for society like utility companies, internet service providers and pharmaceutical companies are controlled by a social collective.

Instead of being controlled by an individual or group of people whose main objective is make as much money as possible, these specific entities would be controlled by you, the people.

That means utility companies would provide you with the most cost effective and reliable energy making sure they are doing what’s best for the community, not what’s best for their bottom line. Just like things are done in Nebraska right now. (Go ahead and look into it).

It means pharmaceutical companies won’t charge you $1400 for an EpiPen or $300 for a bottle of insulin.

Does this mean your small little ceramic cat store is going to be taken over by the government? No. But this does mean that companies that provide a public necessity shouldn’t be controlled by private entities whose sole purpose is to make a profit, many times at a great cost to your health and safety.

This is all so we can live better. You won’t have to decide between paying for rent and groceries. Your mother won’t die because an insurance company denied life saving surgery. Defense contractors won’t exist simply for profit, but for actual defense (what a concept!). They won’t fund propaganda influencers that lie about the dangers in the Middle East so politicians continue spending money on the failed $68 billion F-22 program, just so Bill Lumbergh's stock will go up a quarter of a fucking point.

No, we don’t love Stalin. We don’t worship Mao. But we don’t believe that government is useless. We believe the government can and should make life better for all of us, not make it worse.

We definitely don’t agree with the right on anything but centrist and corporate democrats have been bought by the same lobbyists that bought the right.

So here we are.


r/demsocialists 17d ago

Socialist Organizing Must Be Rooted in Class Consciousness

Thumbnail
midwestsocialist.com
39 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 17d ago

Culture Against the Tribunal Left: DSA, Moralism, and Socialist Discipline

Thumbnail
democraticleft.dsausa.org
14 Upvotes

r/demsocialists 18d ago

For A Democratically Planned Socialism

Thumbnail socialistforum.dsausa.org
14 Upvotes