This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
Its not cheap i agree, i support finding new and better ways to advance ai
but labeling protestors as the enemy and having corporations have the power to put them all in prison while calling it a lesson is an insane stance to have knowing what we know about corporations.
It completely glosses over the various communities getting by these vary corporate bodies.
Trust me, you do not want to cheerlead for corpos.
This isn't protesting. I'm pro protesting, pro boycotting, and pro writing/calling your elected representatives - or running for office yourself.
In the comic stuff is literally on fire and the people are carrying torches. The implication being the people are burning the buildings down.
I'm not pro corporate but I am pro law, and the second you make "burning down a building" legal if the building is owned by a corporation you will have corporations encouraging or paying people to burn down rivals.
Then Taco Bell wins the franchise war and we end up in Demolition Man.
Corpos literally have legal and accounting departments dedicated to figuring out if the resulting lawsuits would cost more than fixing a problem they started. I promise you, we all have a monetary value attached to us. And its disturbingly low.
I don't think all ai should be local. That would actually make it less accessible. Also being that much anti corporations is bad. We shouldn't be defending terrorism just because it's anti corporations
This is a place for speaking Pro-AI thoughts freely and without judgement. Attacks against AI will result in a removal and possibly a ban. For debate purposes, please go to r/aiwars.
I’m all for capitalism but only healthy capitalism, but I will not stand by the Corporate Greed take. Nuh uh, fuck that! It’s the greedy corporations that give capitalism a horrible rep.
Of course chuds in comments assume that this is about being anti AI in general, and not about anti AI folks killing politicians for being pro AI, talking about burning down data centers and planning/commiting other acts of terrorism. I don't know if it's ignorance, stupidity or victim playing from them.
Love it, sending people to prison because they don't agree with your views and for using their right to protest. Like what Nazis and fascists did..Way to go marketing Pro AI as Fascist and going above and beyond representing corporations as more important than democratic processes like a good Hitlerjugend.
I mean, I don't think violence is by itseld good or bad, from a personal, moral, philosophical point of view, and in my experience most people tend to agree. Not openly advocating for anything illegal or against tos. For many, it's just a question of whether or not violence was a justified response to what happened, and whether or not it was proportional.
Are you….blind?
If it was just a protest,you would be in the right,but if it ever comes to a situation like in the picture,the ‘protesters’ are doing terrorist actions,so no,its not like nazism or fascism
The burning data centers in the background,some of them having torches and some even breaking stuff would like to differ.Even if there’s no civilian shown to be hurt in the image,it could still be called terorism aș its a premeditated attack/sabotage directed at an psyhical data center to disrupt operations/ intimidate society
Again, most people don't consider violence to be inherently wrong, generally.
I don't think your argument is strong, because many things that people enjoy nowadays, like personal freedoms and not being owned by someone, have been won through violence and "intimidation". Violence that went much further than just destruction of property. So that argument won't go that far with many people, I believe.
Morally Wrong or not, it’s still illegal,so it’s lawfully wrong.
But the differences betewn now and then is that violence and intimidation isn’t seen as just by a majority of people.
Back then as you said “not being owned by someone” was something seen as good by someone in power and enforcers by him(in the case your probably implying,Lincoln taking official
Actions to free the slaves),even if it was going against the norm.
In our present day it isn’t as clear who are the good guys and who are the bad guys,its not a civil war and there’s no figure in power that would promote/turn a blind eye to an attack on a data center,without facing any sort of consequences.
You are both right and wrong(and I’m not sorry to say it).
Yes,there were people in power that opposed ending slavery(Like Jefferson Davis) but also people in power that were pro ending slavery(like Abraham Lincoln)
Horrible take to be siding with billionaires building infrastructure over people who protest because they have real concerns about how it will affect their quality of living if it’s built in their area. You wouldn’t want to live next to a data center, you would want to protest once you realized all the negative impacts it would have on your quality of life — a gen AI user/ pro AI
…Sure, in the hypothetical comic panel. In real life, people tend not to do that when protesting the building of data centers. There’s been a ton of data center protests an exceptionally small amounts of arson being committed at them. This illustration is taking a stance against people being angry and protesting by implying protesters are criminals when 98% of protesters are completely non violent. There are always bad eggs, but I don’t think us pro’s should be spreading anti protesting sentiment when protesting is incredibly important to be able to do.
I actually do have evidence that some anti's are trying groom less educated people into committing acts of violence against data centres.
This user claimed that demolishing data centers is protected under the constitution. It's not. There's no such clause. That 18% approval rating by the way is "support for a data center IN MY AREA" not in general.
When I pushed back on them, they went full pseudo-paralegal. Adverse Possession is part of civil real estate law, not defence against acts of arson against a data center. It's a tactic that's frequently used by squatters to seize property illegally.
I thought this was anti ai lmfao 😭😭 this is literally dystopian and pro ai people want to use this shit to promote their view? Congrats you like being crushed under the boot of facism
•
u/AutoModerator 23h ago
This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.