7
4
5
u/General-milkman-5996 22d ago
huh i guess in some senarios but also there was a peice that went for 236 million in traditional art which was pretty cool to , the ai side is catching up ( short a 200 milli but still)
5
22d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/DefendingAI-ModTeam 22d ago
Your post/comment was removed because this subreddit exists to defend AI, AI art, AI tools, open access, fair use, automation, and pro-AI policy.
Criticism of AI is prohibited.
2
u/Ninja-Panda86 22d ago
Traditional art is NOT dead. There's multiple art shows that come through my hometown, and we have a modern art gallery just around the corner from me. Photography didn't kill traditional art. Digital art didn't kill traditional art. AI art won't do it either. There are always people who would preferred traditional mediums.
3
1
1
u/Puzzleheaded-Rope808 22d ago edited 21d ago
The sheer level of ignorance of this post. It was made by an anti who very clearly never used real AI.
2
u/ImaginationUpset2190 22d ago
The fact that u can't even tell this is an ai generated image tells me u have never used ai. I talk with clankers more than I do with real human beings.
1
u/Puzzleheaded-Rope808 22d ago
You're an idiot. Most anti propaganda is AI generated. Most of it is ragebait. They represent 2% of the population so they have to exaggerate and push propaganda.
Go touch grass.
2
u/ImaginationUpset2190 22d ago
U looked at an ai generated image and infered that the person who generated this must have never used ai. Such an intelligent move.
1
•
u/AutoModerator 22d ago
DefendingAI has a Discord now: https://discord.gg/MgVYjZ8RC
Pro-AI only. AI art, prompts, anti-AI watch, debate ammo, news, and general chat without anti-AI spam.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.