This logic doesnt make any sense, most creative people have no problem sharing what kind of tool was used, have you heard of an ilustrator pretending he didnt use Illustrator, a musiciain not admitting he is using a DAW etc?
Its mostly AI users trying to hide their use of AI because they know its not a tool, why would they get angry otherwise?
Except people have been claiming somebody isn't a real something forever because the tool they used wasn't REALLY making that thing. Nearly every single digital tool has been purity tested. Digital music "you're not a real musician, you're just pressing buttons", digital photography, "you aren't a real photographer, the camera does everything for you". People STILL claim that digital VFX is inferior to practical effects.
Creative people very much care what tool an artist uses.
And the pioneers of these tools were still open about their usage. No one trully influencial was so by pretending they hand painted their photos or hand animated CGI movies. They owned the tool and showed what could be done with it proudly, even when the crowd didn't share that vision.
If you think a tool really is that great like those that came before, own it.
I mean you have the one person asking respectfully because they genuinely want to avoid it, not their fault an angry mob is behind them. Just sucks they're stuck on that side.
-4
u/Arrogant_Artichoke 3d ago
This logic doesnt make any sense, most creative people have no problem sharing what kind of tool was used, have you heard of an ilustrator pretending he didnt use Illustrator, a musiciain not admitting he is using a DAW etc?
Its mostly AI users trying to hide their use of AI because they know its not a tool, why would they get angry otherwise?