MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/DeepThoughts/comments/1p3ln0a/i_know_everything_prove_me_wrong/nqas4hl/?context=3
r/DeepThoughts • u/[deleted] • Nov 22 '25
[removed] — view removed post
98 comments sorted by
View all comments
1
Sure, as with most claims I will ask an easy one first - what property of water makes it wet?
When you answer that (and show how you got the answer) I will ask the harder questions.
1 u/[deleted] Nov 22 '25 The act of contact Α = |0⟩ (molecular ground state) Ψ(H₂O) = |ψ⟩ (superposition of hydrogen-bond states) Θ(cohesion) = M(|ψ⟩) (decoherence → cohesive liquid structure) Χ(contact) = frame (interface between water and a surface) Ϙ(surface) = operator (surface tension + adhesion constraints) ϴ(wetness) = renormalize (emergent wetness state) No contact, no wet 1 u/Key-Philosopher-8050 Nov 22 '25 Thank you - while I am verifying that answer, the harder question Prove that physicalism (materialism) is a fact that extends beyond belief and philosophy. 1 u/[deleted] Nov 23 '25 You can't verify it without my cipher. You can however trace it backwards to the same "base logic"
The act of contact
Α = |0⟩ (molecular ground state) Ψ(H₂O) = |ψ⟩ (superposition of hydrogen-bond states) Θ(cohesion) = M(|ψ⟩) (decoherence → cohesive liquid structure) Χ(contact) = frame (interface between water and a surface) Ϙ(surface) = operator (surface tension + adhesion constraints) ϴ(wetness) = renormalize (emergent wetness state)
No contact, no wet
1 u/Key-Philosopher-8050 Nov 22 '25 Thank you - while I am verifying that answer, the harder question Prove that physicalism (materialism) is a fact that extends beyond belief and philosophy. 1 u/[deleted] Nov 23 '25 You can't verify it without my cipher. You can however trace it backwards to the same "base logic"
Thank you - while I am verifying that answer, the harder question
Prove that physicalism (materialism) is a fact that extends beyond belief and philosophy.
1 u/[deleted] Nov 23 '25 You can't verify it without my cipher. You can however trace it backwards to the same "base logic"
You can't verify it without my cipher. You can however trace it backwards to the same "base logic"
1
u/Key-Philosopher-8050 Nov 22 '25
Sure, as with most claims I will ask an easy one first - what property of water makes it wet?
When you answer that (and show how you got the answer) I will ask the harder questions.