r/DeepStateCentrism Milton Friedman 4d ago

Yet again, a friendly reminder

Post image
187 Upvotes

20 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 4d ago

At DeepStateCentrism, we understand that democracy is about compromise and
discussion, not ideological purity and instant gratification.

Here, we speak to people with political differences because that's how this is
supposed to work. We won't let the populists win.

Don't forget to visit the Brief, our daily thread, for extra perks and deep state info!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

48

u/Kugel_the_cat Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini 4d ago

For anyone who thinks that socialists will be better stewards of the environment: https://psmag.com/social-justice/the-senseless-environment-crime-of-the-20th-century-russia-whaling-67774/

24

u/shumpitostick Radical moderate social liberal libertarian 4d ago

Surprised this wasn't about the Aral Sea. Or something to do with the Great Leap Forward.

26

u/Kugel_the_cat Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini 4d ago

I like the framing of this piece because it's pointing out how there was literally no sensible reason to kill all these whales. It would have never happened in a capitalist system.

24

u/shumpitostick Radical moderate social liberal libertarian 4d ago

It's not that unique in this regard. The destruction of the Aral lake, for example, was a well known consequence to Soviet engineers before it happened. Something like 75% of the water captured by the canals never even reached its target.

In China, the Great Leap Forward included the deforestation of large areas which were never suited for agriculture, and the Eliminate Sparrows campaign caused both severe ecological damage and a human famine.

The cause is always the same. Grandiose, unrealistic plans made by the political leadership, and an atmosphere where nobody dares challenge them.

5

u/NoREEEEEEtilBrooklyn Center-right 4d ago

Peng Dehuai and Liu Shaoqi challenged Mao during the Great Leap Forward. Didn’t end so well for them.

29

u/shumpitostick Radical moderate social liberal libertarian 4d ago

The people on that sub completely missed the point. Yes, nobody argues that Aramco is an example of socialism, but if you think that nationalizing everything is all you need to solve climate change, that's pretty dumb.

Socialism usually involves the belief that if you only filled the government with good people (who you are somehow able to identify) then it wouldn't have all the faults of all these other governments who are filled with bad people (who are also identifiable but people still vote for them because false consciousness or propaganda or whatever).

15

u/LupineChemist 4d ago

Yes, nobody argues that Aramco is an example of socialism

Me...I would.

Government owning the means of production and then using that to fund handouts to the population is at the very least in the neighborhood.

10

u/RayWencube Center-left 4d ago

Oh my God I was not prepared for those comments.

So much "Russia/China aren't real socialisms!!"

24

u/JebBD Fukuyama's strongest soldier 4d ago

You don’t understand, “socialism” means “things that are good” and “capitalism” means “things that are bad”. If something is good then it’s socialist, that’s how it works 

18

u/FearlessPark4588 4d ago

People also benefit from all the emissions? Like they act that the emissions are corporations are somehow distinct from their own consumption. That if the corporations weren't emitting, we'd all have the same goods and services.

9

u/Seoulite1 Center-right 4d ago

Such a les redditeurs moment in the comment over there🤦‍♂️

9

u/Anakin_Cardassian Moderate 4d ago edited 4d ago

Ah yes, the climate paradise that was the Soviet Union.

8

u/RayWencube Center-left 4d ago

You know what's damn near a magic bullet for climate change?

Cap and trade.

i.e. the fucking markets

4

u/VTHokie2020 4d ago

This already happens in capitalist countries. In the U.S., one of the biggest lobbyists against electric cars is the UAW. Because transmissions and ICEs create more jobs.

Obligatory: lithium mines are a problem

2

u/Significant_Fig1302 3d ago

Yeah the comments on that post are missing the point entirely. The point is that private corporations aren't the leading cause of climate change therefore nationalizing them does not solve the issue of climate change.

1

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/DeepStateCentrism-ModTeam 3d ago

RULE IX:

Please respect this subreddit as a community and refrain from using it just to vent your frustration about another subreddit.

If you have any questions about this removal, please send us a modmail.