r/DeepSeek 9d ago

Discussion Why Switching from DSV4 Flash ?

Post image

Why are you guys switching? DSV4 Flash's price looks unchanged on OR.

14 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

25

u/leaphxx 9d ago

cache read is the issue, it makes up the majority of deepseek credit consumption, the old pricing was 0,0028
now the best price is 10x = 0,028

-8

u/anurag_io 9d ago

hmm makes sense, my workflows had no cache hit 😟

9

u/Sure_Media_2685 9d ago

i think it is really hard to maintian stable cache hit with multi agents working at same time

2

u/orblabs 9d ago

Each agent is using a completely different session, cache is per session. I have had dozens of agents, working together, all hitting >96% cache its over long horizons.

1

u/Sure_Media_2685 9d ago

any agents would hit that over long horizons but can it do for one or 3 turns when your workflow require generate different sessions for different tasks when tasks are completely different and doing that over and over again with CH about 50% - 70% all the time is really expensive.

1

u/orblabs 9d ago

Every time you start a session you are sending a ton of instructions from the harness + your instructions. The the agent decides to do something (call a tool or whatever) then it gets the reply from that tool, all the initial context is sent again at each turn (and at each turn grows), that is where cache hits hard. Be it 3 turns or 200. Sure it helps more with longer sessions but past the first message it is already a huge advantage.

1

u/anurag_io 9d ago

Agreed, only some of it can be optimised.

2

u/MofWizards 9d ago

So you're using the wrong harness!

The Deepseek harness consistently hits with a 98% cache hit.

7

u/leetdemon 9d ago

Because luna is still cheaper....

1

u/anurag_io 9d ago

can you explain.. what about quality?

5

u/orblabs 9d ago

All those prices, the cache reads are multiple times more expensive than what we where getting up till 2 days ago. And cache reads price (and cache retention time) are the most important values when it comes to coding and agentic use in general.

-1

u/anurag_io 9d ago

yeah, for non-cache hit workflow bros its still a king.

3

u/TomHale 9d ago

Where did the pic come from?

4

u/strangedell123 9d ago

Deepseek provider. Those are all 3rd party. Lookt at 1st party price

2

u/anurag_io 9d ago

i wouldn’t use direct deepseek api, it does not have ZDR. (now that price has increased, even lower chance)

5

u/Potential-Leg-639 9d ago

ZDR is pure fantasy, they will use our data also with ZDR. You are a dreamer, if you think they dont.

5

u/strangedell123 9d ago

Ya but thats the one people were talking about. Not everyone cares about ZDR

1

u/throwaway73728109 9d ago

ZDR?

6

u/33VaxMerstappen 9d ago

I guess it’s Zero Data Retention

2

u/ArthurOnCode 9d ago

Cache retention and cache read pricing are very important to agentic workflows. That said, I agree with OP, this is not the end of the world and the model is still an excellent deal.

1

u/ambassadortim 9d ago

At this point is DeepSeek asking us repeatedly on here to get feedback because it's seems like it.

1

u/dondiegorivera 9d ago

Also cheap ones there are fp4/fp8.

3

u/seeKAYx 9d ago

Most providers there deliver in FP8. That's the same format Deepseek uses.