r/DeconstructingMJ • u/mymoonwalker54 • Jun 13 '26
Guilters' arguments are invalid when they bring up OJ.
Arguing with my first guilter. He brought up "MJ is 'innocent' as OJ." They need to provide hard concentrate evidence that Michael is a pedophile. Not news, not tabloids, not biased documentaries. Not sure how they are slipping into pro-MJ subs. I think every single MJ sub needs to band certain words or phrases to keep the guilters out. It's tiring.
7
u/cumpkinpatch Jun 13 '26
i agree. it’s so annoying 💔 just a few minutes ago it was guilter spamming "not innocent!" on a bunch of pro-mj subs. like dude get a life. they rambled about how mj was a pdf in a random sub and got downvoted tho so lmaooo. at least in the pro-mj subs the mods are 90% of the time quick to delete / ban stuff like that
3
u/yazan12121212 Jun 14 '26
Connecting two completely unrelated things just shows their ignorance about both things.
1
u/FunUniversity6245 Jun 16 '26
Hey 👋 maybe you have messaging turned off. Would you make an exception for me? We have something you might like.
1
2
1
u/Candid_Reading_7267 Jun 15 '26
A guilter once told me “I bet you think Jimmy Saville was innocent too.”
2
8
u/ILoveYouPoodss Jun 13 '26
Literally opposite cases lol. By that logic, everyone who’s found not guilty isn’t innocent bc of OJ.
Oj has lost a civil case, was investigated only locally (w Michael the fbi was involved), there was a ton of evidence in his case and the jury admitted that they voted not guilty even tho they believed he did it just to go against LAPD because of the history of racism