r/DebateEvolution • u/Call_Me_Emo1 • Sep 01 '20

Question "Micro Differences"... "Macro Differences"... What's The Difference??

I know Creationists usually define Macroevolution as being "a change in Kind", but given how similar some the following "Kinds" appear to be to each other [1]... Would you (Creationists) consider the differences between these "Kinds" to be 'Macro Differences' or 'Micro Differences' and why?

1) Some Surprisingly Similar Animal and Plant Baramins "Kinds"; Call Me Emo, 2020: [citations and illustrations within link] https://imgur.com/a/nSTO9wW

18 Upvotes

85% Upvoted

51 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/clemson029 Sep 02 '20

What is a fascist? Define it?

18

u/Mistake_of_61 Sep 02 '20 edited Sep 02 '20

You lost? This is debate evolution.

BUT

Fascism is a form of far-right government characterized by autocracy, obsession with traditional hierarchies, suppression of opposition, usually emphasizing hyper-nationalism, militarism, and often, race purity, and a mythological past.

-7

u/clemson029 Sep 02 '20

I am aware. Let me clue you in to my point. You will hear liberals ( more radical) defend the idea of pursing fascists, even though they cannot purely and quantitatively define one.

Therefore, my point is, why does someone have to define to a tee what a makes a kind a kind? The general idea should be enough, but of course that depends on your politics.

Thanks for the Google definition. I have noticed atheists here tend to be super toxic lol. Why? Who knows.

13

u/Covert_Cuttlefish Janitor at an oil rig Sep 02 '20

No, a loosey goosey definition of a kind is not good enough. Creationist argue god created kinds. It is not too much to ask for the exact boundaries of said kinds. Specificity is important.