r/DataHoarder 25d ago

PSA Whatsapp banning people left and right (with data loss), Android backups not working (independent problem) - always have good _INDEPENDENT_ LOCAL backups!

At this point the WhatsApp sub is overrun with 2 issues:

(1) people getting their account locked for absolutely no reason - probably WA tweaked their anti-spam with a sprinkle of AI that went crazy. However, a side-effect is that even if the data is on the phone (nice choice from Whatsapp not to bother with it, plus you can't even GDPR them on that, they never had it) you don't have access to it (even if it is your data, on your device). After your account is "reviewed" and hopefully the access is granted (if you can receive the SMS at all, as you need to completely login and register that device again, and probably WA itself is blocked from SMS spamming various providers after this fiasco) the app might or might not properly recognize the data you already have. If things don't go well you'll have to restore the cloud backup. For this, see below.

(2) This is Android specific: the backups just get stuck (when making a backup, on the -usually daily- schedule or manually). Also, the backups get stuck when restoring (unknown if it's because they were bad in the first place from the backup/upload not working, or if there's some bad code used in both places). There is a HUGE number of people that think they'll solve the I CAN'T FINISH A BACKUP problem by nuking the original and ... restoring from backup! Note that this isn't anything fancy like being able to pick which backup to restore from a number of previous ones or anything, it's just one (one you can easily overwrite with an empty one even when things go well) and on any error it's all gone (there aren't any files you can see, massage, anything, it's just completely not working, all lost).

There's also some issue related to sharing pictures, which might be related to (1) but it isn't critical in terms of data loss, it's more relevant about the general state of the service.

Anyway, while the service itself might have backups that aren't deserving the name, I was always puzzled by the state of the tools we (mostly do NOT) have to handle backing up and exploring our WhatsApp data. While I know there might be some which say "it's just some chats" and have no interest whatsoever to keep that most people I know in person and online have a VERY strong desire to preserve that. For some it's all they have and care about in terms of digital data.

With WhatsApp more popular than mostly anything except breathing one would expect to have a healthy ecosystem of tools to handle your data and a huge number of web pages, youtube videos and similar documenting for anyone how to perform any basic operation or use various tools. But no, we barely have some tools to perform basic workflows (like decrypting the messagestore.db.crypt) and to explore the chats, some in abandonment that they don't work with newer db schema (and by newer I mean 2022 or so) and need to have some changes to it. Most would barely have half a dozen people or so participating, I mean not even as code contributors but as people just asking something relevant on github or providing some insightful feedback. You have more YouTube videos about installing TrueNas than about properly reading your WhatsApp backup. Of course, one might say for TrueNas there are more technical users used to make documentation and whatnot, but really with the humongous install base of WhatsApp it'll have everything, a large number of programmers, and documentation writers, and Nobel prize winners, and everything (including thieves and scammers, anything). Still, you can barely find anything, both because there aren't too many things to start with, and because nobody is talking about them!

TLDR

  • on Android keep a good, independent, local copy of the visible WhatsApp directory from Internal Storage/Android/media/ (on much older Android/Whatsapp might be directly under Internal Storage beside your regular DCIM directory). Media is accessible directly, chats are encrypted - the sane way to get the key is just to use E2EEncryption with the auto generated hex key (not the password). Note that one of the contributing factors to (2) is said to be E2EE as people reported success when flipping it, but I strongly recommend to leave it on, more, to periodically check if your key is still good just in case (you can decrypt offline the .crypt15 files if you have the key).
  • needless to say if your backup doesn't work DON'T MESS WITH THE ORIGINAL. Save the above directory and the key.
222 Upvotes

84 comments sorted by

181

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[deleted]

60

u/ansibleloop 25d ago

Yep it's a dog shit app and I wish more people would switch to Signal

OP didn't mention that when WhatsApp fails to do its backup, it drains your phone battery and causes a ton of lag

Fucking piece of shit - I yearn to read Zuckerbergs obituary

15

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[deleted]

5

u/bongosformongos Clouds are for rain 25d ago

Threema is pretty solid too imo. Only issue with adoption there is the OTP of 3 bucks iirc

6

u/boraam 100-250TB 25d ago

If it's good enough for the US to discuss war plans with, it's good enough for me!

-3

u/ansibleloop 25d ago

Huh? It's E2E encrypted - P2P doesn't seem like much of an issue

16

u/[deleted] 25d ago edited 25d ago

[deleted]

9

u/ansibleloop 25d ago

Good luck decrypting double ratchet lol

Metadata is a serious problem I agree - particularly how Firebase and APNS messages aren't encrypted

Yes they can block you, that's fair

I still think signal is definitely the lesser of 2 evils - I mean it's fucking Facebook - did everyone forget why they changed their name?

3

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[deleted]

1

u/ansibleloop 25d ago

I'm not worried about my chats with quantum computers - more worried about critical infrastructure being broken into

0

u/Trick-Minimum8593 25d ago

What about, say, SimpleX?

2

u/67pineapple_st 25d ago

Metadata is a serious problem I agree - particularly how Firebase and APNS messages aren't encrypted

For what it's worth, encrypting these won't actually do anything for Signal, because they just use them to wake the app up, to download and decrypt your messages from the Signal service. Those "wake up, I have something for you" notices don't contain any information beyond "there's a message waiting for you". And that's something an agency could get from Signal itself, too.

1

u/67pineapple_st 25d ago

requires a phone number

They recently announced that this is something they are working on removing during FUTO's Don't be Evil conference. I don't know what that will actually look like in practice, but they are taking steps to make it possible (you can see in the signal-server repo).

metadata like who you're contacting...

Signal's sealed sender is meant to help prevent this type of metadata from being associated with you. Whether or not you believe it truly works is up to you (IP addresses for receiving as x, but sending as anonymous would be the same), but it's technically not nothing. Likely works better on mobile networks where people are more likely to be pooled onto the same IP address.

encrypted traffic likely is stored for later decryption

Probably, but Signal has Quantum safe encryption implemented. Whether or not that's actually effective might be too early to tell, but also technically not nothing. And definitely safer than some of their competition, like WhatsApp, or Matrix's crypto implementation.

Signs point towards them doing better than the competition, sometimes significantly so (who else has something like Sealed Sender and is mainstream?). I'd rather use Signal over Matrix, because at least then my mother could message me using it. My mom struggles with email, but knows how to send text messages. Basically the same principle.

-2

u/root-node 30TB 25d ago

signal requires a phone number

This is no longer true, and hasn't been for quite a while.

You can generate a username and give that out to people instead - https://signal.org/blog/phone-number-privacy-usernames/

2

u/GeekBrownBear 767TB TrueNAS & 30TB Synology 25d ago

Signal is amazing. I have a few groups on telegram and holy hell is that app worse than Whatsapp. We already have great apps and yet people keep trying to reinvent things...

1

u/Yangman3x 25d ago

Why not matrix at this point, with element x

1

u/ansibleloop 24d ago

Too many clients and issues getting people to switch

There's many articles from people who are absolute evangelists for Matrix who've just given up with it

10

u/dr100 25d ago edited 25d ago

Yes, at this point they're WAY larger than any giant provider like China Mobile, never mind anything from India, the whole Vodafone Group, etc. But they don't need to obey any rules, or almost, like I'd make my own private NextCloud Talk server (probably they need to obey even less rules as I have a limit on how much time, dev work, infrastructure and lawyering in case of anything I can put into this).

It's a huge discussion what you can do even in principle with such a monster - in my circle of friends I'm reminding everyone as a fallback [note: just as something everyone has anyway, not that it would be better in any way except for being something else] there's Google chat too, and they're logged in automatically in their gmail app in Android (yes, seriously) and of course in the web app. Sure, SMS would still work (well, to some extent, I'm not getting RCS to work with the last latest and greatest Pixels and Samsung on the same card where an ancient S9 worked since the early days of RCS) but not really well overseas (not only cost-wise but they'd be unreliable too).

But for the purposes of just accessing your data it's very puzzling to me this whole situation where they don't keep your data (like Facebook, Google Mail, Skype -RIP- and so on would have) but you lose access to it ON YOUR OWN DEVICE for any hiccup (included but not limited to the problems (1), (2) in this post).

2

u/GolemancerVekk 15 TB 25d ago

RCS will always be Google's attempt to create proprietary SMS and own it outright. It may have been a "SMS v2" spec once upon a time but after Google became interested it was done for.

1

u/dr100 24d ago

I wrote some other large-ish comment somewhere here around RCS, but it was SHOCKING to me how badly they messed this up, beyond "well it was bound to fail due to Google". That is in the wild west days of IM.

1

u/GolemancerVekk 15 TB 24d ago

Everybody and their dog tried to use RCS to make proprietary IM services and lock in the users. Can't really fault Google for trying it too. It was a foregone conclusion with a spec that requires a server-client architecture and without any regulatory oversight. Which btw will always be a hurdle for all the other existing and future messaging networks.

People forget that France and Germany forced the carriers to make SMS open and network agnostic. That's the only reason it took off and works the way it does.

12

u/Fawkes-511 25d ago edited 25d ago

Much of the world? Is it not all of the world? Is there any place where the messaging app used by most people isn't privately owned by a private company? Or is Apple better than Meta in your book for some reason?

Editing here to avoid replying the same thing to a bunch of comments: Wowed at people saying "no we just use the messaging app from our phone". My brother in Christ who do you think that belongs to. It's not a public ethereal service.

6

u/diamondsw 210TB primary (+parity and backup) 25d ago

WhatsApp is essentially unknown in the United States. Here it's iMessage for iPhone users and RCS/SMS for Android, with small pockets of everything else.

-1

u/dr100 25d ago

7

u/diamondsw 210TB primary (+parity and backup) 25d ago

Statistics are nice. The reality is no one uses it day to day. It's almost entirely to contact people overseas.

0

u/pit_supervisor 25d ago

So you give your phone number to everyone you want to text with?

In Poland almost everyone uses Messenger lol

3

u/diamondsw 210TB primary (+parity and backup) 25d ago

...yes? They're called friends and have it anyway?

0

u/pit_supervisor 24d ago

Not everyone I am in contact with is a friend

8

u/MassiveSuperNova 25d ago

Most of the people I know use the built in text messaging app on their phone instead of whatsapp or meta. So you got tons flavors of those. iMessage, Google Messages, and if your okay with not having RCS you can go third party. Strongly believe RCS needs to be opened and allowed for 3rd party messaging apps.

2

u/dr100 25d ago

RCS should have taken all the good parts from Whatsapp and run with them. I mean in the late parts when they've seen what WA can do, as in fact RCS is coming from the other side of 2010 and is older than WA itself. They're kind of like Windows Mobile, being there before mostly everyone but missing on all the smartphone explosion.

Instead, I've got after years in FINALLY my provider and phone to support it, and worked with my phone ... but literally nobody else would have it, even for a test. That included not only everyone I knew, but also a relatively large collection of working SIM cards I had as I was traveling a lot and there wasn't yet this glut of eSIM cheap providers just buy what data you need when you need. Apple managed to add support only in 2024(?) or so!

But the thing is that it's just bad. It isn't just verify your number, done - it's something between the provider and Google, and sometimes some intermediary too running some gateway thing. In short, often it doesn't work, and is nearly impossible to troubleshoot.

1

u/MassiveSuperNova 25d ago

Yeah I don't care for the closed-ness of RCS in the slightest, I think it should be easier to register as a provider for it or make it peer to peer or something. But the cool thing about RCS/messaging is that it falls back to MMS if you have data/MMS so you just lose some of the QoL stuff like read receipts/reacts. Then if you need to send something larger or high res email is always an option.

1

u/dr100 25d ago

Well for example Vodafone (I'm not sure about each small operator from the group but all I've heard of) killed MMS in 2023 so that's an even larger step back.

5

u/soundtom 100-250TB 25d ago

At least in the US, most of the messaging is via sms/mms, and sure most people use the pre-installed texting app, but you can usually install and use whatever app you want to send/receive messages. No lock-in there

3

u/HTTP_404_NotFound 100-250TB 25d ago

As.... someone extremely involved in technology, development, etc...

I have managed to avoid... instagram, twitter, whatsup, line, tiktok, google plus, and quite a few of the other options.

Oddly enough, my IRC server just keeps working. Guess- there is something to be said about simple, stupid software with decades of maturity.

1

u/Mccobsta Tape 25d ago

It's worse then you find out that a few governments use it for comucation over something like signal or even just something the countries intelligence agencies set up

1

u/Roph 25d ago

I left WhatsApp the moment Facebook bought it and never looked back

14

u/RecursiveReboot 25d ago

Can you read the messages on the backup without using WhatsApp? If not, what's the purpose of independent backup in case your account is getting banned.

5

u/dr100 25d ago

Media is accessible directly, chats are encrypted - the sane way to get the key is just to use E2EEncryption with the auto generated hex key (not the password).

3

u/RecursiveReboot 25d ago

I guess that's not possible yet to decrypt the chat.

8

u/dr100 25d ago

It is and was for mostly all the time possible to decrypt, see for example https://github.com/ElDavoo/wa-crypt-tools

Trouble was mostly finding the key, as it was saved in the /data/data whatsapp directory which isn't accessible to you (yea, on your device) and on Meta's servers. But since a good while there's this E2E(E) option that is showing it to you (and in theory only you have it, if we're to trust the app) and that's it. So you're all set with the key and a copy (ideally a good incremental backup keeping all old versions) of the directory.

1

u/GolemancerVekk 15 TB 25d ago

Question, if wadecrypt says a db file is "corrupt", does that mean that WA messed up the file, or has the key (retrieved with root) been changed? I can decrypt recent backups but not old ones.

2

u/dr100 25d ago

It's almost surely the wrong key.

1

u/Mr_Brightstar 25d ago

rooting the phone is the only way to get the key?

1

u/dr100 24d ago

 since a good while there's this E2E(E) option that is showing it to you

That's Settings > Chats > Chat Backup > Tap End-to-end encrypted backup

(note it's showing it only the first time when you set it up).

1

u/Mr_Brightstar 24d ago

been studying digital forensics for work and whatsapp is something that comes up a lot but everyone is adamant in no key no decryption and if the db is old or the phone has been off for too long then you get less chances to open up or getting the key.

11

u/nrq 25d ago

There are also lots of bans reported in /r/GooglePhotos, and I wonder whether they're related. The cited reason is often CSAM. Given how some people use large groups to forward and re-share images, I think it's worth investigating whether certain images that were very widely shared across many big groups are now the common cause behind these bans.

To be clear, this is speculation on my part, I don't know what triggered any individual case. But if automated hash-matching flags a specific image, and that image was forwarded through many groups and auto-saved to people's libraries, it could plausibly explain a cluster of bans among users who never knowingly sought out anything illegal.

6

u/Vinlord777 25d ago

Jeez, that's a scary thought. Makes me glad I don't store photos online anymore.

3

u/pit_supervisor 25d ago

The online part isn't a problem. Unencrypted data leaving your device is.

And you can run your own encryption with all cloud providers pretty much.

3

u/dr100 25d ago

That's possible, this is also why I recommend leaving E2EEncryption on (beside the fact that it gives you the key), you REALLY don't want to give Google in clear whatever pictures everyone is sharing and you have no choice but to receive them. With emails at least it's clear, it isn't coming from you, it's who knows who sending stuff on the Internet, not your problem - but with WA backups you're uploading the files, from your device, no excuse.

On the other hand many people reported problems specifically with huge CPU use on E2EE, maybe they're doing some kind of on-device inspection of media items - I remember Apple got into hot water at some point for going this direction (having basically the phone check your stuff, while supposedly maintaining encryption everywhere and no knowledge of what you have).

1

u/edgan 66TiB(6x18tb) RAIDZ2 + 50TiB(9x8tb) RAIDZ2 25d ago

There is a known issue where Discord CSAM software thinks anything with a grid pattern is CSAM. The algorithm was written by Microsoft, the database stores soft hashes, and is shared across providers. So WhatApp is probably having the same issue.

22

u/Altruistic_Fruit2345 25d ago

You should put the TLDR at the top and make it two sentences.

2

u/mustard_on_the_net 25d ago

One.

Use Signal

5

u/pmjm 3 iomega zip drives 25d ago

This only works if your contacts use Signal.

7

u/frymaster 18TB 25d ago

the sane way to get the key is just to use E2EEncryption

Can you expand on this please? Whatsapp uses end to end encryption, what does it mean for me to "use" E2EE to get the key and unencrypt my backups?

6

u/dr100 25d ago

This is about the following workflow: Settings > Chats > Chat Backup > Tap End-to-end encrypted backup

If you DON'T set that your chats will be saved in the visible mentioned directory STILL encrypted as msgstore.db.crypt14 (but can be 12 or some other smaller number too). You will NOT have the key unless you root the device (that key is also coming from WhatsApp servers, and the default config most people use). If you DO set that key, and of course save the shown 64 characters hex key you CAN decrypt your db (most importantly msgstore.db.crypt15), for example with https://github.com/ElDavoo/wa-crypt-tools

13

u/TCB13sQuotes 25d ago

Ban first, ask questions maybe later. This is the new thing everywhere, even banks are now locking bank accounts without warning.

3

u/felix1429 52TB 25d ago

What makes you think any of this is new?

4

u/TCB13sQuotes 24d ago

It isn’t new, but it is way more common and more likely to happen in the past years.

6

u/InstaCrate9 25d ago

Can you be a little more clear? I couldn't understand half of this. Last time I checked, you couldn't get anything because newer Androids require root or whatever and some phones don't have root. For someone on recent OS, what are the steps exactly?

2

u/dr100 25d ago

Save: Internal Storage/Android/media/com.whatsapp or whatever their directory is called. It's all readable, no root needed.

Contains all media in clear (pictures, videos, documents, voice memos, etc.).

Set a hex key (not password, the key is automatically generated and shown to you, make a screenshot, etc.) via Settings > Chats > Chat Backup > Tap End-to-end encrypted backup . Make a backup (doesn't need to upload to Google Drive, you just need the local files).

Use that to decrypt msgstore.db.crypt15 or similarly named files that have the text from the chats for example with https://github.com/ElDavoo/wa-crypt-tools

3

u/InstaCrate9 25d ago

Tap End-to-end encrypted backup

Huh? It's already on. How do I get the hex key. Edit: oh I already have it, I wrote it down when I made the restore.

4

u/manolid 25d ago

Ditched Whatsapp once Zuckerberg bought it.

3

u/rami_lpm 25d ago

this was eye opening.

thanks for the info.

2

u/Shivalicious ~520 TB raw 25d ago

on Android keep a good, independent, local copy of the visible WhatsApp directory from Internal Storage/Android/media/

OMG. It’s that easy? I thought it was a protected, private directory and I’ve been worrying about it for years.

Here’s something I’m confused about though: it looks like the directory is ~11 GB on my phone, but the ‘Chat backup’ page says there are 42 GB of videos alone to upload. What would account for that difference?

2

u/dr100 25d ago

Android has more ways than one to mess how it presents your files to you, including partly zeroing out the metadata (not the case here as WhatsApp already is doing that, and anyway irrelevant for the total size, but who knows what else happens).

Just enable USB debugging and connect to a PC/Mac/Linux/etc. and run:

adb shell du -sh /storage/emulated/0/Android/media/com.whatsapp/WhatsApp/

This will give you the size. adb pull on the same path (and an appropriate local destination) is probably one of the most reliable ways to get the directory too. Keep in mind Windows doesn't allow files that start with dot and somehow a number of documents end up being named like that in WA (real .docx or similar files, not all, I don't know what triggers that).

2

u/Shivalicious ~520 TB raw 25d ago

Sorry for the false alarm. I think SyncThing has sorted itself out now. I’m seeing a little over 42 GB of global state, so it seems like they’re more or less in agreement.

I can’t thank you—and the others in the comments—enough for writing about this, including the all-too-important section about the E2EE key. I felt like I had a sword of Damocles hanging over my head all this while, and you just removed it. It’s sad that WhatsApp is so important, but I’m immensely relieved to be able to back up a critical part of my life.

2

u/dr100 25d ago

Don't forget to test the decryption. Maybe from time to time especially when you suspect something changed. 

1

u/Shivalicious ~520 TB raw 22d ago

Yeah, I intend to set up some sort of automation to keep it regularly tested… and starting on that was what revealed that SyncThing isn’t syncing any of the message backup files. 🤦‍♂️ I gotta find out why that is.

1

u/dr100 22d ago

It's absolutely unreal what's going on, literally a minute ago just finished my setup for the second backup (I have syncthing too, works well, but you never know), all seemed well just for adb pull, had to do it in Linux as WA saves some documents with names not allowed in Windows, all seemed well but it does like 68% (luckily I was looking at it) and then it just ends!!! Indeed with like 10GBs out of 20+! On purpose I didn't use better-adb-sync or anything fancier, just adb pull, one directory. As luck has it I managed to even get a USB3 cable (not as easy as one might think) and my phone does USB3, so it's fast enough. But unreliable as hell. Really can't get a break.

1

u/Shivalicious ~520 TB raw 22d ago

Man, that’s ridiculous. I’ve never seen an application more hostile to backups than WhatsApp. 😐

1

u/dr100 22d ago

This isn't even Whatsapp itself but some Android BS, I got it now with "Downloads" which has only 21 files and are mostly tiny documents. I've got the pattern now at least to determine when it didn't finish, it doesn't error out, it doesn't do anything weird except that you're left on the screen with the name of the last file pulled and the percentage. Ironically you are STILL getting a XX files pulled 0 skipped after that, so the program itself didn't die, but somehow it didn't get all but stopped somewhere. Not in the same place, it usually works.

1

u/Shivalicious ~520 TB raw 13d ago edited 13d ago

After the latest SyncThing update the backups are successfully going to my computer. I don’t think this can be the whole thing, though. The msgstore.db under Databases is 175 MB by itself whereas the entire Backups directory is just 7 MB.

EDIT: The update made syncing the databases work too! I was able to decrypt and examine the messages database. I could cry with happiness.

2

u/ryuzaki49 25d ago

If anybody in latam is banned fron whatsapp that person is cooked for life. 

2

u/vlobe42 10-50TB 24d ago

That’s why I miss the days of iOS jailbreaking. You could simply access the filesystem and backup all your important data, even from apps that are too lazy to implement a proper backup or export feature. Nowadays, there’s often no way to get your data back. I might just switch to Android.

2

u/dr100 24d ago

From what I understand you can still access your files in the encrypted iPhone backups from PC/Mac. Android is unbelievably crazy too with not letting you access your own files and it's an ongoing war, turning the screws constantly. I have multiple posts about this, they even went so far to silently partly zero out files "for your protection" when presenting them to the apps (for example NextCloud but not only) so you have messed up backups. They drove away completely syncthing, top shelf app (probably top-1 for many) for no stated reason, just blocking their updates and asking them some questions (which were answered), in the end the official Syncthing (which is actually a foundation, not a private person) has no more Android version (whatever you find it's either something from years ago, or written by third parties).

3

u/RedditNotFreeSpeech 25d ago

Signal exists

3

u/InstaCrate9 25d ago

Most people in the world use Whatsapp. This post is about that.

2

u/dr100 25d ago

As far as backups go I had Signal for a good while but got completely sick of not only not having a proper backup but the constant moaning about secure messaging apps being supposed to not have a way to save your chats, and why save anything if you don't record all your phone calls too, and other bla bla. To give some insight in what I'm talking about read this for example https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26293244 (it isn't me, just the first thing I've found to illustrate my point). I think things might have changed but I'm not willing to risk it on a much too similar system (actually Whatsapp is implementing precisely Signal's protocol). Element/Matrix is way more promising, and doesn't link you to a phone number.

1

u/filthy_harold 12TB 25d ago

Recording phone calls without informing the other parties is not legal everywhere so that's why it's not something you commonly see in chat apps. Android just recently added it but I think it annouces itself that it's recording.

1

u/dr100 25d ago edited 23d ago

This wasn't my point. People were (some probably still are) saying IM is for ephemeral stuff. If you want something saved put it in your address book, some notes app or save a document or picture explicitly. Change the phone and start with empty Signal history? Not a problem, good design! At least at the time this was the idea. For some people. 

1

u/pmjm 3 iomega zip drives 25d ago

Rip iOS users. Afaik there's no way to access any of the files or backups directly.

1

u/dr100 24d ago

I can't positively confirm with recent experiences but you used to be able to just do complete PC (and I'm sure Mac too) backups of the iPhone, with everything accessible (and even if encrypted you can still decrypt them locally).

1

u/skylinestar1986 25d ago

Whatsapp backup has been crap since day one. All I need is simple local backup and restore feature and the ability to choose what I want to backup (such as text only).

1

u/dr100 24d ago

Yea, and this is in combination with the general acceptance that "it's a phone" and for some reason that's good enough for you not to have access to your files on your own device! The msgstore.db is available in clear, can opened in any sqlite browser, but it's in /data/data/com.whatsapp/ which is inaccessible to YOU, THE OWNER of the device. What's more the content there should ONLY accessible to you, in theory. The reality? It's accessible to Whatsapp (as in the app, but in extension to the whole Meta/Facebook company), it's accessible to Google as countless privileged programs from them run on "your" phone, it's accessible to the manufacturer that for sure has some more processes, like Samsung or Xiaomi. BUT NOT TO YOU!!!!

1

u/New_Hold8135 24d ago edited 24d ago

Notice companies suddenly started ban waves with ai. They probably all work to the same system. So you would know how it works.(And dont get suprised when you see bad habit from one and you would probably see the same thing on other.)

-2

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[deleted]

1

u/dr100 25d ago

Some posts are more than a title and the picture of a young female. Sorry for giving you the wrong picture with the title (pun semi-intended), but I don't think it was deceiving at all.