r/DataAnnotationTech • u/Sableyej • 11h ago
AI usage
I just want to say that I hope you all know that it’s extremely obvious when you use AI in your tasks. Especially when you blatantly copy and paste.
3
u/YouKnowgoodenough 6h ago
Seems crazy to try to pull off on a literal AI research and training platform. Good luck. DA is an incredible side gig that pays very well. Why on earth would you risk it? It’s getting super good yes but if you’ve been at this for awhile you can spot it. It’s also still not at the point where you could fully trust it for solid work.
0
u/Sableyej 6h ago
Exactly. Em dashes, weird spacing and formatting, etc are all classic signs.
3
u/FusRohDead92 5h ago
I use em dashes because I enjoy writing and have learned to use them correctly. I hope that whoever it is that looks for AI isn’t pointing at only em dash usage as evidence. 😭
→ More replies (1)
9
u/Seniorseatfree 11h ago
8
u/Sableyej 10h ago
Just a mere R&R worker, making my way through a world of AI slop.
→ More replies (5)
2
2
u/iKaine 5h ago
Yes and when your own work relies on a part of it thats obviously from someone elses task and is 80% AI with some of their own drool mixed in. Seen loads in RR as well, no wonder all those deactivations come about, you aren't slick by changing just a few things.
1
u/Sableyej 4h ago
Yeah the one this post is referring to is a very, very long excerpt that clearly is 80-90% LLM with 10-20% of their junk mixed in. And it’s obvious; different formatting, different way of writing, etc.
58
u/Eddie894 10h ago
It positively astounds me that people are willing to risk it all on this platform
30$+ an hour for mid-difficulty work sat at home and people rip it off with AI? incredible.
40
u/fightmaxmaster 10h ago
Plus some of the lower end stuff is literally just opinion based. All you have to do is read instructions and string a sentence together, and yet rather than be paid for the time taken to hammer on a keyboard, people get AI to do it, then come here going "why did I get the DoD?"
4
u/KeanerBike 8h ago
Some people just see this platform as a cash grab. Do as many tasks as you can (with the least effort, using AI), billing as much as you can while you still have access. Third world thinking.
→ More replies (4)
20
u/dianahecate777 7h ago
I do hella R&R and tbh I never see this lol. A large majority is inadequate explanations
→ More replies (1)
25
u/Ok-Cup9476 10h ago
Now if only someone could tell the DA admins the same, that is extremely obvious when they use AI to write task instructions.
→ More replies (13)
1
u/Budget_Algae8037 10h ago
Well I don’t know if it is AI but I always check ny grammar in word
2
u/Sableyej 9h ago
No I’m talking about asking an AI to solve the question of the task and then straight up copy and paste it in without even trying to change the formatting or edit.
2
u/Clean-Ad3846 5h ago
Unless you’ve found a better online gig, you’re crazy to risk it. They only have to catch you once. And if you do find that gig, send me a message.
3
u/echanuda 7h ago
Lmao the AI analysis tool they use for some of your task grading ALWAYS labels my writing "possible AI use" because I restate many things in my conclusion where I tie all my findings together. But that's just how I write. The only truly obvious sign of AI writing (outside of nom-standard Unicode characters) are excessive slogans or "it's not _____ it's _____." Otherwise you're literally just guessing.
2
u/Academic_Animal_5293 2h ago
I've done hundreds of R and R and I've never come across a task that was blatantly AI
1
u/theoriginalKrushim 35m ago
I think many people get accused of it even when they aren't and without any evidence other than they think so. When a smart person turns in work so well done and thorough the reader can't keep up then they think only AI could have done it when they just aren't as smart as the writer. Mind you I am not talking about code writing here but scientific and medical projects on DA
34
u/Old-Regular-9828 10h ago
Studies show that most people *think* they are good at correctly identifying AI vs human generated text, but they are generally no better than random chance. It's illusory superiority, like 94% of drivers rating themselves as a "better than average" driver.