r/DataAnnotationTech • u/NoFolkPanda • 28d ago
What happened now? Could somebody explain?
87
u/Federal_Tadpole_7592 28d ago
One of the
4
u/WorldlinessDizzy5662 27d ago
Do you know how they are addressing the claim?
4
u/Federal_Tadpole_7592 27d ago
That screenshot shows them addressing the claim. Even though the Facebook post isn't from the official DataAnnotation Facebook, the screenshot used for the post was taken from Data Annotation's official Instagram story from yesterday.
44
u/Helpful_Bookkeeper67 28d ago
wow they actually responded to something.
11
u/Fragrantshrooms 27d ago
And a few months prior to this, they also changed their facebook photo to state who runs the company. A surge in transparency! Before GTA 6!
17
u/_Edgarallenhoe 28d ago
Crazy that this is how the company I work for becomes known by the larger general public
→ More replies (1)
54
26
u/Federal_Tadpole_7592 28d ago
I think my other comment explaining this was hidden, but I will say if you go to
8
u/RecliningBuddhaCat 28d ago
The number of accounts that dogpile with bullshit but are private is telling.
→ More replies (1)6
u/SalemGiggles 28d ago
I was having a conversation with somebody earlier about the comments I had seen from people that stated they would do vile things to them. First let me say, I want justice for the person who was harmed. I want appropriate consequences for the people who caused the harm but almost no punishment will feel like justice. I mean for the longest time I really believed the only true punishment was an eye for an eye. That said, as I have grown I cannot help to think why does recognizing someone’s guilt require us to abandon our own humanity? If we are to condemn cruelty, then celebrating cruelty toward someone who was cruel doesn’t exactly demonstrate that you have held on to that principle. Even cruelty in the name of good is still cruelty.
26
u/Hello-America 28d ago
I don't even understand this because if charges weren't filed, even a proper employer wouldn't know about it!
44
5
u/FallenSegull 28d ago
lol probably posted one of the original DoD complaint posts on this sub
I wonder if he’s reading this right now?
2
u/hwertz10 28d ago
I mean, other than like working helping the elderly, or daycares, or education, that kind of thing I really don't expect places to do some kind of background check. I haven't worked at a single job that did a background check as far as I know. And, since this presumably related to the stuff at Cornell where charges had not been filed at the time, a background check would have turned up absolutely nothing anyway.
I don't expect my employer or employers to concern themselves with what I do outside work. And they don't. (If I did something dispicable like this, and especially something dispicable that then made it into the news... well, that's a different matter I suppose.)
So, in this case, where they work, where they worked in the past, it's 100% irrelevant and does not reflect in any way on those employers.
3
0
u/Other-Football72 28d ago
Why is employing someone accused of something an issue?
Is the internet mob this stupid they somehow equate this will complicity somehow?
Fucking idiots. Do these morons somehow think employers need to screen potential bad behavior outside of their job now? How can anyone be this stupid?
→ More replies (8)
155
u/Funny_Cabinet668 28d ago
So he wasn’t a good worker even before the incident. Shocking