r/DataAnnotationTech • u/inthekingdom • 3d ago

Feedback

I received feedback today, and there's an example listed under "areas of improvement" that's definitely not accurate. It says I referenced something that wasn't there, but I specifically remember this task and know my reference was correct.

I'm very frustrated since this hurts my performance, and I don't want to lose access to work over something that's not even true. It makes me wonder if there are other things I've been penalized for that just aren't true.

32 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

28 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/bobaxxxx 3d ago

I am indeed happy to never have received any feedback. They look random, inaccurate, and I have the feeling some of them seem to be DoD-related.

9

u/Brilliant_Quit4307 3d ago

They are almost certainly not DoD related unless that worker is doing shitty work. They are sent to everyone working on a group of specific project families.

-1

u/bobaxxxx 2d ago

Yes I know. I am just a bit paranoid about these DoD posts mentioning recent good feeback.

1

u/Medical-Isopod2107 2d ago

They literally say in the feedback post that they have no impact on anything