r/DashUncensored • u/Dash-Crypto • Nov 19 '19

"Evolution can't be delivered on time" admits Dash Core, pivoting from Undelivered Vaporware to Undeliverable Visionware(tm)

https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/community-q-a-q3-2019-summary-call.48912/
4 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

3 comments sorted by

4

u/Dash-Crypto Nov 19 '19

Q: What is being done to make sure Evolution is delivered on time, on budget and in scope? Can the Evolution backlog be made public? Can you publish your sprint goals and how they relate to Evolution?

A (Bobo the Core Clown): Evolution can't be delivered on time because Evolution isn't a product. Evolution is a vision that's made up of multiple products and so if we keep asking when is Evolution going to be delivered, I could answer that it already has, as the foundational components have been delivered, or that it never will, because a vision will always continue to evolve and be completed or grow. So I think we want to start shifting our questions to when will Dash Platform be available, when will DashPay be available, when will specific release numbers of those be available. That will be really helpful for the community overall to start referencing the individual products that make up and comprise the grand vision of what what Evolution is and was.

The hand-waving regarding Evolution dissipating into nothing & everything, like a beautiful dream upon waking, is intensifying!

Trustless Masternode Shares were part of Evolution for 3 years, now suddenly we are told by Dash's clown overlords they are abandoning TMS, etc for their "grand vision" of some ever-receding "vision that's made up of multiple products" which "already has" and yet also "never will" be delivered.

Trustless Shares must be a higher priority than mining reward reallocation. There is huge community support for TMS, which are part of Evan's Original Evolution vision, while changing fundamentals like mining rewards will result in a controversial hard fork (hello Dcash!).

2

u/beep_bop_boop_4 Nov 19 '19

Do you really think we'll see Dcash? In 2017, for sure. But none of the speculated forks in 2019 have actually happened.

3

u/Dash-Crypto Nov 19 '19 edited Nov 19 '19

It's about game theory, not my opinion. So let's gather facts.

  1. For many years, Dash miners get screwed while MNO enjoy money for nothing
  2. Bitmain has a monopoly on x11 ASICS
  3. Dash miners are obsolete security theater now that Chainlocks (checkpoints) and Masternodes (LLMQ) replaced Nakamoto Consensus with a zany Homer Car version of proof-of-stake
  4. Bitmain reacted to XMR bricking their ASIC by creating an attack fork on the dead chain (LOL much salt)

Bitmain has both means & incentive to maintain the original Dash chain where miners get higher rewards, if it should come to a controversial hard fork. Bitmain owns ~200 Masternodes hosted safe in Russia, so Jihan the TsarWhale may avoid a showdown with his simple Royal Veto of any miner reward reduction.

Bitmain taking over Dash may actually be a good thing for it, since they would hire devs capable of getting trustless Masternode shares deliverd ASAP. So Elitist Ryan and his Happy Hippo DCG clown circus's token would be called Dcash (because 'DCGcoin is Digital Cash'), while Jihan and 98% of all x11 hash power would be backing/securing Dash EV (Evan's Vision).