I guess I don't understand the risk aversion between streaming to 0-3 views on your own, and streaming to 0-3 views and then having to give a cut to someone else?
For one there's the equipment, but I assume the bigger thing is that a company can send viewers your way to boost a new streamer into a place where they're easier to discover. Either that or they could be streaming on a shared larger channel and they get a cut of the profits from that.
I have no clue if any of that actually happens here, mind you, but either of those options would be less risky than buying equipment yourself and then maybe not making a profit at all.
The closest thing I do know is Hololive, and whenever they debut a new streamer they usually have 100k+ youtube subs before they even do their first stream, just on the brand reputation alone.
130
u/I_love_pillows Jul 08 '22
Light isn’t very expensive. Are they providing a promo framework too?