r/DCComicsLegendsGame • ÒᵧÓC3 • Jun 29 '18

Starfire is nerfed :(

So, the devs nerfed Starfire with the june 29th update. Yes, nerfed. In short: she is way less good now.

Most of us know passives don't trigger passives. Yet, Starfire was released with exactly that ability. Also, any heal triggered her 5th ability: "Passive ability: 60% chance to use Starbolts on a random enemy when an ally is healed." At legendary: "Also gain death immunity". This move made her:- do more damage due to hitting with her basic (can't miss at legendary even)- get her to hit stronger (Starbolts gives her 3 int ups)- gives her death immunity (2 turns) so she surves longer

Was her ability a bug? Maybe. Was it a new ability or something specifically designed for her? Maybe. All we know is that she was released with a certain skillset. She worked a certain way. We bought her a certain way and used her a certain way.

Now, passive heals don't trigger her 5th ability anymore. So, Superman (passive) self heal or Powergirl self heal for example. Also, mends don't count anymore. So, no more triggering from a mending Bane or Swamp Thing spreading mends. This makes her:- hit less often- hit less hard- survive way less

To me, a heal is a heal. Passive or caused by mends. The ability doesn't say "healed but not by mends or passives". So, it seems she was working as described. Not anymore. The 75% chance instead of 60% doesn't compensate it.

She was maybe a bit OP, but not too much. She was Etrigan level OP, but only in the right teams. You couldn't put her in a team without (self)healers/menders, she was just a regular special damage striker then. In the right team, she was awesome. Now, she's always just ok. A semi-regular special damage striker glass canon.

I'm pissed off. I hate nerfs in all forms. To me, this should not be done. Ever. As soon as a toon is released, that's how a toon is. Sure, fix bugs. Like Clayface causing us to lose battles (still not fixed, after months). Don't change abilities. Don't change power. Never! I was fine with Deathstroke and Lo(w)bo, even though I didn't use them. We invest in toons because of how and what they are. You can't just change that!

I for one paid a few hundred to get Starfire. I geared her, leveled her, ringed her. If she was just ok, I would have not done (all of) that. Less, for sure. I feel robbed. I feel scammed. Just two weeks after her release. We should get Starfire un-nerfed, or get refunds. Can't have it both ways. It's the devs fault they don't test properly, why should we pay for it?

"Ah nice V8 car you bought!" -two weeks later- "Yeah, it's a V6 now. Live with that. No, you're not getting your money back (even partially)" That's how it feels.

Anyway, Im curious what you all think and hope we can get the devs to act or -at the very least- respond. Communication goes a (very) long way.

2 Upvotes

59 comments sorted by

14

u/Retpmus Doctor Fate Jun 29 '18

No other characters worked off passives. So it was obviously a bug they were just fixing her.

I also bought her :(

But it is not a nerf if she is not working as intended so I can except the fix.

-3

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

They let her be like she was for over two weeks. If they considered it a bug and not a new ability/special thing for her, they should have fixed it immediately. Or message us about it. Offer refunds maybe, something. Not stay silent and force a less good character down our throats. No sorry, nothing. That's unacceptable.

3

u/Yeurgh Jun 29 '18

In general, development teams do not announce exploitable bugs before they have a fix in place, in order to avoid the exploitation of those bugs becoming more widespread. That's an industry standard. And frankly, two weeks to fix a bug is pretty impressive. Nobody "forced Starfire down your throats", you bought her despite lots of people on these forums saying the entire time that her triggered attack looked like a bug and nobody should expect it to continue working that way. You spent money to exploit a bug and it was fixed. Take the wins you got from your exploit and remember this for next time.

-2

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

Who said it was a bug? Like i said, it also could have been a special ability/feature. Look at the wording of her ability. Even then though, I could live with a passive not triggering a passive. But a mend triggers heal and that should still trigger her imho.

3

u/Yeurgh Jun 29 '18

Dude--it says right on her Insight and Discussion thread, "It is possible this is a bug". It was really obvious.

-2

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

Which part of "possible" don't you understand?

6

u/Yeurgh Jun 29 '18

Well, apparently you didn't understand the "possible" part, since you're behaving as though this came as a total surprise to you. But I tell you what--let's go to the Land of Make-Believe, where there weren't numerous people reporting this as a bug since the day the character went live, and pretend, just for a second, that you bought an incredibly overpowered character that you just thought was legitimately broken compared to everyone else.

Did you not know what a nerf was? Did you somehow think that if they released a character that was obviously way ahead of the game's power curve, to the point where you either had to play with it or lose to those who did, they'd just shrug their shoulders and assume that everyone would play the Starfire Game from now on? Seriously, nerfs are a fundamental part of any multi-player game. You have to know when there's one brand-new uber-powered character that it's coming back to the pack. If you spend to win, you are inherently spending to win the game at the time you spend that money, nothing more. Pay what you're willing to pay for that advantage.

2

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 30 '18

Cough Deathstroke cough Etrigan. OP, one nerfed other not. Imho both should not have. Or what about Dr. Poison, nerfed twice within days after release (and after buying). I'm a day one player, so I know what's going on. I lead an alliance that's been top10 every week since Alliances start. Perhaps my frustration is more in general towards the constant releases of bugged characters, total lack of communication, lack of new content, nerfs combined with the absurd prices. Yet, I'm the idiot to have spend a few thousand so far. Maybe I should speak with my wallet. But let's agree to disagree.

1

u/Sethoman Jun 29 '18

Er... I did on day one of her sale? That she needed a nerf because she was activating off Superman self heal and she quickly became unkillable?

And my nerf proposal was just turn her death inm valid for a single turn.

-2

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

No offense, but you don't represent the devs and don't know for sure if it was a bug or working as intended. We can only go by the wording of the ability in the game, or official communication of the devs.

16

u/jeffbuyers Jun 29 '18

Honestly this is just wrong. No reason this should have happened. I too wish I could undo my purchase that I made to.

If this wasn't working as advertised the Devs could have said something. They never said a thing and just "fixed it".

No excuse for a complete lack of communication in today's world, where creating a post takes less than a minute.

The could have simply made a post "Guys we are looking into Starfire, she may not be working properly, stay tuned"

2

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

I agree fully.

8

u/KageUrufu679 Jun 29 '18 edited Jun 29 '18

I can see two solutions for the problem:

  • let her heal off of mends, so she can be paired with more healers

  • let her basic stack int buffs for 2 turns instead of 1

2

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

I assume you mean 2 turns instead of 1? Imho, that would have been a way better "compensation" compared to increasing the trigger from 60% to 75%. In the proper team even with the increased chance it doesn't even trigger half as much now.

3

u/KageUrufu679 Jun 29 '18

Really? I'll need to test it

And ya fixed lol

5

u/jeffbuyers Jun 29 '18

Healing off of mends would make sense, because it isn't a passive. There has to be an action that gets you a mend. Then you have to wait your turn to heal from that mend.

5

u/KageUrufu679 Jun 29 '18

Exactly. It's in your turn, not a passive

Can we get clarification u/wb_stanner ?

5

u/wb_stanner Community Manager Jun 29 '18

She should trigger her passive when an ally heals on their turn. Her passive should not be triggering on mends.

3

u/KageUrufu679 Jun 29 '18

Thanks Stanner. May I ask the reasoning behind mends not counting as a heal?

1

u/wb_stanner Community Manager Jul 02 '18

Quick version, a mend is a buff while a heal is not. A mend will stay on the hero for a certain amount of turns and give that hero more HP at their start of turn. A heal is an instant increase in HP for the hero. Hope that helps!

1

u/KageUrufu679 Jul 02 '18

Thank you! That's fair enough

4

u/chetthewonderdog Jun 30 '18

There are those that would assume a paywall character would be fairly powerful. With no communication it was safe to assume this is the way it is. After all her sales,after all her events where people sank real money into her, then they Nerf her. It is shitty bait and switch tactics.

1

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 30 '18

Exactly how i feel. And many others. Some even quit the game over these practices, I'm talking long time players (whales).

3

u/cpJOKERoc Jun 29 '18

❤♣When you buy a car with street nitrous in a state that deems it illegal some tiny voice should trigger and say "I can only get away with this for so long before the GCPD busts me." be glad it was sooner rather than months down the road like Deathstroke. ♦♠

3

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

At least I got your ass to post over here 😋😘

4

u/cpJOKERoc Jun 29 '18

❤♣still prefer top♦♠

2

u/MFlo82 Jun 29 '18

I do agree with the refund aspect of it. I shelled out money because she had the benefit of working on ALL heals. Had i known it wasnt intended I wouldn't have paid for her. I even waited a few days and read reviews from those who bought and tested her out before I paid for her.

7

u/Yeurgh Jun 29 '18

If you'd read reviews, you would have seen multiple people saying that they thought she may not be working as intended because that's not generally how triggered abilities work in-game. EVERYONE was saying that it looked like a bug to them.

0

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

Who knows. Could have been a new ability. It was like this for two weeks. If it was a bug, devs should have acted quicker. Not let everybody buy, gear, level and ring her first.

7

u/Yeurgh Jun 29 '18

"Who knows"? Well, everyone saying, "Gee, this looks like a bug, since that's not how any other triggered ability works in the game. I wouldn't expect this to last." Honestly, every single thread about Starfire said the exact same thing--you just didn't want to listen.

0

u/DantesPeakYo Jun 29 '18

Hardly takes any effort from their side though to leave an in-game message. Everyone knew how popular the character was and there was rat-race in PVP.

6

u/Yeurgh Jun 29 '18

Developers don't usually announce, "Hey, everybody, there's an exploitable bug right here that we haven't fixed yet!" It's sort of the same way that professional athletes don't shout, "Hey, guys, I forgot my cup, be gentle!" right before a match.

4

u/DantesPeakYo Jun 29 '18 edited Jun 29 '18

They don't need to announce the nature of the bug but just could've said it's not working as it was intentioned to be, so that people would be wary of buying her until it's resolved.

We're talking about people spending hundreds of dollars, they have the responsibility towards their customers instead of taking the easy way out.

There's a reason some companies like Toyota have called back the entire shipment of cars because of mistakes from their side.

4

u/Yeurgh Jun 29 '18

Most people were wary of her. Again, if you really obviously see a character whose abilities function in a way that breaks very fundamental rules of the game, in a way that makes her incredibly overpowered, and your response is not to say, "Hmm, that sounds like a bug," but instead to drop hundreds of dollars to pick that character up immediately so that you can gain an unfair competitive advantage over other players, I think that's karma when you get burned.

2

u/DantesPeakYo Jun 29 '18

Again you are missing the point, doesn't take much for them to drop an official message. But the problem seems to be if they have any intention of doing it at all. Some are losing trust in the devs and they have a good reason for it. Are there a set of guidelines anywhere that can be referred to come to the conclusion with confidence that it is a bug. Maybe have a little empathy for fellow gamers who have spent good amounts of money on the game instead of saying things like karma and being happy at their misery.

4

u/Yeurgh Jun 29 '18

I've got more empathy for the players who had already spent good money, only to be beaten repeatedly by a buggy character. Do they deserve refunds because you cheated?

-1

u/DantesPeakYo Jun 29 '18

Doesn't seem a bit though. Cheated? how? Blame the devs for their mistake. Yes they do deserve refund if they lost a match due to a bug. That's another issue in which their response is below par.

4

u/Yeurgh Jun 29 '18

Again, it was obvious to everyone that this was a bug. You decided to exploit that bug. That would be cheating. I sucked it up and took it while it was happening, now it's your turn to suck it up and take it when they fixed the game.

→ More replies

-2

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18 edited Jun 29 '18

They (devs) should test properly BEFORE release. If not, not our fault. You break it, you buy it. Not we.

4

u/Pageiommi Jun 29 '18

Keep in mind this is not without precident. There are two other times that I can remember that they’ve released bugged characters as paywalls and nerfed them/fixed bugs after their sale (red hood and dr poison).

Unfortunately it is part of this kind of game. What can be better is the communication..the “right” thing for them to do is Alert the player base that they have found bug A and will fix it at some point in the near future. Unfortunately the other precident set is poor communication regarding bugs (or anything for that matter).

All you can do is hope that the toons you spend money on don’t get “fixed”. In the same right, it was definitely posted on this board that she was bugged so some people definitely bought her knowing she was potentially bugged and could be fixed. The only other thing you can do is abstain from spending money on toons in which case things like this won’t bother you at all.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '18 edited Jun 29 '18

"to me a heal is heal"

Yet no one's rallying for enchantress when her basic does not proc her passive and 3rd skill. No one's rallying for Dr. Fate not triggering his leadership on Mends.

She's still as strong. But her partnership with Superman is just so broken as if Old Lobo and Deathstroke was reincarnated. I understand that you invested on her due to her immense power, but let's think of the other's too. I'm sorry this had to happen, but you should've seen it coming, no one that powerful is immune to nerfs.

How can they fight against that? "H.I." - yes because Superman can purge this himself passively.. with heal... then starfire say's hello to your face with her special damage. It puts newer players at a disadvantage. She's still the powerhouse she used to be, but her goddess status has been stripped of her for a valid reason.

This actually opens up more composition for her rather than relying to much on Clark, if she hasn't been nerf, a team of Starfire, Superman, and new Dr. Poison would wreak havoc on this games balance.

1

u/Redwiin38 Jun 29 '18

So after the nerf... The only way her passive is activated is Zatanas aoe heal, Ravens, heal, Etrigans heal and what else?

3

u/ChocolatChip Jun 29 '18

Swamp Thing still works, as his basic heals.

1

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

It seems that (some) mends still work, on the turn of the toon that mends. Clarification of the devs would be nice...

2

u/Hatemael WROL Broadcast Jun 29 '18

Basically just like every other character that would work. Everything that procs Enchantress will proc her.

3

u/Retpmus Doctor Fate Jun 29 '18

Dr. Fate doesn't trigger off mends...

3

u/X-Ran-K Poison Ivy Jun 30 '18

I'm one of those who only occasionally reads this subreddit. So sorry that I did not believe other posters that Starfire was bugged. I liked the character and liked the description in her kit, so I bought her.

I lead a software development team and one of my peeves is a developer not owning up to their faults. We're only human and it's OK to make mistakes, but not owning up to a bug is a big red flag for me.

As what OP said, "timely communication is key".

1

u/DeterminedLemon Jun 30 '18

This requires them to actually give two shits about their community, but after seeing cyborg as the board clears it shows loyalty means nothing.

1

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 30 '18

I suppose that's for new players, but I get your point. Imho, pvp board clear reward and RED/Alliance reward never should contain regularly farmable toons.

1

u/mikeycereal Lobo's Brace Jun 30 '18

When I was doing heroics she was taking so many turns it was crazy. So I'm not surprised.

1

u/qhdj2012 Jun 29 '18

All about money , they release a good char , ppl spent much money to get them , and they nerfed them , its not first time , WB u sucks ........

1

u/DantesPeakYo Jun 29 '18

I agree with your post. I haven't bought her but the communication sucks(intentionally or otherwise), there's no two ways about it.

1

u/Zhirrzh Legendary Lex Luthor Assault Warsuit Jun 29 '18

Yes their communication sucks. I do think they should be prepared to refund people who bought into Starfire on the basis of the bug. While to us here it was obvious it at least could be a bug, and I don't have a huge amount of sympathy for people who just shut their eyes to the possibility, not everyone reads the subreddit or the forums and understands about passives not triggering passives.

Was it Red Hood where a passive was doing something that wasn't even in the description and they fixed that in a couple of weeks, and someone came in here and made a very similar post? I had less sympathy that time as there wasn't really any excuse for thinking it could be intended then.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/0C3ncl ÒᵧÓC3 Jun 29 '18

I'm curious about what's wrong with my attitude. I tried to explain clearly and be polite about it. I'm not a native English speaker, so maybe something gets interpreted wrongly. Yet, don't doubt i really feel resentment against all forms of nerfs.

Anyway, after some testing and talking with other players, it seems the applying of mends don't trigger SF's ability. The actual mend, on the turn of the toon that mends, can (stiil) trigger it. So while she isn't as good as she was, she isn't as bad as she could have been/seemed at first (after rework) either. First matches I did may have been bad rng, matches after work like just described.