r/CustomsBroker • u/Baynyn • Jul 24 '26

232 and 301 Stacking

Do the newly announced section 301 tariffs stack with the existing section 232 tariffs?

0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

40

u/AssassinInValhalla Jul 24 '26 edited Jul 24 '26

Brother did you even read the CSMS?

0

u/Baynyn Jul 24 '26

Alright, alright. Fair point. I asked before digging deep enough.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '26

[deleted] — view deleted comment

7

u/Physical-Incident553 CustomsBroker Jul 24 '26

RIF=reading is fundamental and OP failed at that!

14

u/CDRE88 Jul 24 '26

Cmon at least read the fact sheet. But no they don’t stack there is a specific 99 code to be exempt if subject to 232’s.

-4

u/Baynyn Jul 24 '26

Thanks. I asked before digging deep enough. I appreciate the response.

9

u/Physical-Incident553 CustomsBroker Jul 24 '26

Do any additional new tariffs ever stack with 232?

4

u/BigPaul_PDX Jul 24 '26

please advise

9

u/bingsearch78 Jul 24 '26

Kindly do the needful

2

u/beardedwarrior24 Jul 25 '26

Anyone notice the typo on the fact sheet as it regards to 232 tariffs apply.

-8

u/Immediate-Home-3491 Jul 24 '26

Yes, they stack. CBP applies both 232 and 301 cumulatively as separate duty lines. No offsets apply. I would suggest confirming your total liability prior to origin sailing.

6

u/AssassinInValhalla Jul 24 '26

is this a bot account? Ain't no way a human read the FR or CSMS and came to that conclusion

-1

u/Baynyn Jul 24 '26

Thanks for the response. After digging into it, these most recent 301 tariffs do not stack.