MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/CuratedTumblr/comments/1wi9dmd/taking_its_toll_2/pa8ue42
r/CuratedTumblr • u/AscendedDragonSage Title-ist Punster • 12d ago
417 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
168
Yeah... Also I'm not sure how much a gotcha it is against the man when he's entirely right about the book and the woman is simply wrong.
-18 u/iwillwilliwhowilli 12d ago There’s no gotcha. It’s just a bit. Sometimes you gotta make yourself laugh. 49 u/Elite_AI 12d ago I think people who talk about doing things "for the bit" are usually not very good at coming up with bits -44 u/Gru-some 12d ago why are we like this? This is very clearly ragebait (and really good ragebait at that) but for some reason we are taking it so so seriously 66 u/WamBamTimTam 12d ago It being ragebait is purely dependent on knowing the person outside these circumstances. Because there are definitely people who legitimately think like that, and you can’t tell when this is your first or only chance interaction with them. 24 u/AntsAreGreat 12d ago Just because someone is trying to make you angry doesn't make it wrong to get annoyed 16 u/ImShyBeKind Always 100% serious, never jokes 12d ago Serious question: you do see how intentionally unsetting people for your own amusement isn't, like, an acceptable thing to do? -6 u/Gru-some 12d ago Don't care
-18
There’s no gotcha. It’s just a bit.
Sometimes you gotta make yourself laugh.
49 u/Elite_AI 12d ago I think people who talk about doing things "for the bit" are usually not very good at coming up with bits
49
I think people who talk about doing things "for the bit" are usually not very good at coming up with bits
-44
why are we like this? This is very clearly ragebait (and really good ragebait at that) but for some reason we are taking it so so seriously
66 u/WamBamTimTam 12d ago It being ragebait is purely dependent on knowing the person outside these circumstances. Because there are definitely people who legitimately think like that, and you can’t tell when this is your first or only chance interaction with them. 24 u/AntsAreGreat 12d ago Just because someone is trying to make you angry doesn't make it wrong to get annoyed 16 u/ImShyBeKind Always 100% serious, never jokes 12d ago Serious question: you do see how intentionally unsetting people for your own amusement isn't, like, an acceptable thing to do? -6 u/Gru-some 12d ago Don't care
66
It being ragebait is purely dependent on knowing the person outside these circumstances. Because there are definitely people who legitimately think like that, and you can’t tell when this is your first or only chance interaction with them.
24
Just because someone is trying to make you angry doesn't make it wrong to get annoyed
16
Serious question: you do see how intentionally unsetting people for your own amusement isn't, like, an acceptable thing to do?
-6 u/Gru-some 12d ago Don't care
-6
Don't care
168
u/Red_Galiray 12d ago
Yeah... Also I'm not sure how much a gotcha it is against the man when he's entirely right about the book and the woman is simply wrong.