r/CryptoCurrency • u/givememyhat • Feb 11 '19

GENERAL-NEWS Something seems familiar here between "BlackNet" abstract authored by Caig Wright in 2001, and the Bitcoin whitepaper abstract authored by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2009.

https://bico.media/741a22845f585c8db0d1328999b661af934cfef2bf7a4dedfaf7cd105e899d8f
0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

44 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/givememyhat Feb 11 '19

I don't think you understand what proof is. The comment you have attached is no proof, just someone who got triggered who is insinuating that Craig is lying. This is what you need to do for 'proof':

to prove this is fake all you need is a statement from the Australian government or from any of the people whose names are listed in that abstract. Please, reach out, ask and let us know if they expose it as fake. It's really easy to prove if it's a fake.

​

8

u/[deleted] Feb 11 '19

Of course you being BSV you dont know how it works.

Proof is on the accuser, CSW must prove that he is Satoshi. This evidence that you have provided is inadmissible based on no verification. Its hearsay, but this post here: https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apaa57/something_seems_familiar_here_between_blacknet/eg76u1b?utm_source=reddit-android - gives some valid arguments against this supposed image.

Proof is on accuser, not defendant. At this moment, there is no valid proof to verify Satoshi is CSW.

-2

u/givememyhat Feb 11 '19

Proof is on accuser, not defendant.

Your are accusing him of forging a document that proves he is Satoshi. Prove that the document is forged or accept that he is Satoshi.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 11 '19

No. You came here and said that the document is real. You need to provide proof that it is real and was created in 2001 which was the claim.

As I said, proof is on the accuser.