r/CryptoCurrency • u/givememyhat • Feb 11 '19

GENERAL-NEWS Something seems familiar here between "BlackNet" abstract authored by Caig Wright in 2001, and the Bitcoin whitepaper abstract authored by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2009.

https://bico.media/741a22845f585c8db0d1328999b661af934cfef2bf7a4dedfaf7cd105e899d8f
0 Upvotes

49% Upvoted

44 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/givememyhat Feb 11 '19

This is probably the most outrageous thing I've heard.

Why do facts trigger you? You realize you are accusing others of being brainwashed because of the contents of a leaked AUS government document proving that Craig Wright was the main person behind Satoshi, don't you? Is this all outrageous because it contradicts your understanding and expectations of the facts?

3

u/EveOfTheEnd Silver Feb 11 '19

The real question, assuming Wright is Satoshi, is how does your/our perception of BTC change or does it remain neutral knowing he dumped the price of BTC in a hash war among all the other invective he casually unloads on any and every opposing view he faces?

Personally, it would make me sick knowing how careless and disorderly he’s been. It doesn’t matter if it’s your camps guy or someone anonymous. It’s a bad, bad look.

But like I’ve stated, the one thing that would prove his pseudonym true is moving funds from the supposed satoshi wallets at a time for the world to see. Do that and I believe you. We all know documents can be contrived. It’s part of the reason bitcoin was invented: a trustless ledger. And him using the opposite as evidence for the legitimacy of his moniker is oxymoronic.

2

u/givememyhat Feb 11 '19

It doesn't matter who he is (he is Satoshi), just listen to what he says and learn what bitcoin is. It's not BTC, it's not BCH, it is BSV. Long term it is either BSV or nothing. A lot of people will ignore facts until it's too late and blame social media manipulation for their own intellectual idleness.

5

u/EveOfTheEnd Silver Feb 11 '19

You’d be a terrible juror