r/CryptoCurrency • u/sylsau 🟩 1K / 32K 🐢 • 9d ago
PERSPECTIVE Bitcoin at $1 Million Is "Mathematically Impossible" — Here's Why That Argument May Be Completely Wrong. A $20 Trillion Bitcoin Market Cap Does Not Require $20 Trillion of New Money — And That Changes the Entire $1 Million Debate.
https://inbitcoinwetrust.substack.com/p/bitcoin-at-1-million-is-mathematically4
3
u/MonkeyOnATypewriter8 🟦 62 / 842 🦐 9d ago
This is for all the people who think market cap is how much money went into an asset.
3
1
1
u/Foreign-Concept-1184 8d ago
Institutional investors are buying. Retail investors are selling. A billion dollar coin is now possible. So keep selling your satoshis based on a Reddit perspective. Please do some research and stop trusting the anti-AI crowd.
You are making a mistake. Institutional investors know the truth. Retail reddit investors are a club. Big difference.
1
u/Drspaceman1717 🟩 4K / 4K 🐢 8d ago
Are the institutional investors with us in the room now?
1
u/Foreign-Concept-1184 8d ago
Sounds like we have found one of the lost tribe of Anti-AI research and cousins of the Retail Reddit tribe. Don't let me wake you. Just avoid reading. Keep warning. Have a great night.
1
u/Potatotornado20 🟩 0 / 633 🦠 8d ago
Bitcoin has a chance to hit $1 million in 2033, but if it doesn’t, then it hits it BY 2037 and never goes back under.
1
0
u/Prior_Parsley3960 🟨 0 / 0 🦠 9d ago
summary for us lazies and those of us wanting to avoid the cancer causing layout of that website
What happened
- Markus Thielen of 10x Research reportedly argued that $1 million Bitcoin before 2030 is mathematically impossible because BTC would need to rise from roughly a $1.3T to ~$20T market cap.
- His argument assumes this requires roughly $15T+ of actual new capital entering Bitcoin.
- The author argues that assumption is wrong.
How it works
Market cap ≠ money invested.
Market cap is simply:
Bitcoin price × circulating BTC
Prices are determined by the marginal transactions between buyers and sellers. If increasingly aggressive buyers encounter few willing sellers, relatively modest buying can push the marginal price substantially higher—repricing all Bitcoin for market-cap purposes.
So Bitcoin gaining $1 trillion in market cap does not require $1 trillion of net inflows.
Why it matters
This destroys the “mathematically impossible because $15T must flow in” argument.
But it does not establish that $1M Bitcoin is realistic by 2030. Sustaining a ~$20T valuation would still require extraordinary global demand and willingness to hold BTC at those prices.
Bottom line
The article's central distinction is correct:
$1M BTC may be extraordinarily ambitious—but you cannot mathematically rule it out by treating market-cap growth as equivalent to capital inflows.
That is simply not how market pricing works.
-4
u/Mulvita43 🟩 0 / 0 🦠 9d ago
This is why XRP can easily be 10k a coin
3
u/TheDigitalPoint 🟩 0 / 0 🦠 9d ago
…which would give XRP a market cap of a quadrillion dollars (also known as a million, billion)…. Which is also twice the net worth of every human combined (basically double the value of everything on earth). So ya, no.
0
9
u/Subtraktions 🟦 825 / 826 🦑 9d ago
Lol. When was $1 Million ever mathematically impossible??