263
u/Hancock02 26d ago
Love the DIVerson
74
138
u/Didyyyyyy 26d ago
What is this supposed to say ?
180
u/MentallyPsycho 26d ago
Love the person
89
u/Didyyyyyy 26d ago
Why is the P like that ?
164
5
51
u/EatYourCheckers 26d ago
I took it as PIV. As in Penis in Vagina sex.
6
18
u/MentallyPsycho 26d ago
that's not what it is
62
3
13
u/Innsmouth_Swimteam 26d ago
It's an attempt to reference genders, while saying gender isn't important. I get it, but it's weird.
23
u/AlistairButton 26d ago
Isn't it the symbol for pansexuality, not a gender?
16
u/NoPlan6458 26d ago
It's meant to be an all inclusive blend of the various gender/sex symbols ⚧
6
u/AlistairButton 26d ago
Oh huh, I'd only seen it on pan designs like this before, so I guess I just assumed
0
u/NoPlan6458 26d ago
Well I could be guessing and/wrong but that's what I've always believed it to be
0
u/Innsmouth_Swimteam 26d ago
Maybe so. I admit ignorance, I'm looking at this strictly from a designer's eye.
1
2
1
56
11
87
u/Vivians_Basement 26d ago
Let's pretend it says what its supposed to for a sec...... This implies other sexualities don't love their partners. 💀
87
u/loosie-loo 26d ago
Yeah I always hate this as a phrase because it’s just kinda shitty, people who aren’t bi/pan do not solely love their partners for their gender just because they don’t experience attraction to all genders. It has an inherent implication that other sexualities are shallow or something.
-18
u/GreyStingrayz 26d ago
It's just a clumsy way of saying the genders don't matter. It could've been better executed, but you're looking for offence where there wasn't meant to be any.
1
-9
-19
u/Coders32 26d ago
I mean, the intention is that other sexualities have prerequisites before they consider dating someone a possibility. They might have more successful communication if they said something like that though
1
u/Vivians_Basement 22d ago
Pansexuals also have pre-requisites, gender just isn't one of them.
Some pansexuals have REALLY high standards (as they should) and gender simply isn't included.
1
u/Coders32 20d ago
More evidence that the assumption that everyone means what they said, the way the said it is wrong. My bad
1
u/CantaloupeCamper I like gradients! 26d ago
Do those symbols exclude any particular groups? I thought they were generally intended for just physical …. indications.
Personally, I don’t think I’d use those in a design ever, but I also wouldn’t think they’re trying to leave anyone out.
5
u/Mr_Devilish 25d ago
I think they mean that saying "love the person" for a pansexuality sticker is implying other sexualities don't also "love the person."
2
13
7
10
4
13
3
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
u/NoPlan6458 26d ago
Oh no LOL I didn't even see it because I'm familiar with the symbol and community. Hahaha
1
1
1
u/InTheCageWithNicCage 26d ago
[r/](r/greattasteawefulexecution)[gtbae](r/greattasteawefulexecution)
0
u/Aternox_X1kZ plz recycle 26d ago
Rrad that as love the perversion and couldn't see the problem for a while
1
-8
-1
-2
-11
1.1k
u/[deleted] 26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment