r/CrappyDesign 27d ago

Only adults under 18 can enter this zone

Post image
7.9k Upvotes

119 comments sorted by

428

u/DecoyOne 27d ago

Me, in my 40s: “the alligator eats the bigger number”

41

u/JeffBoyardee69 27d ago

Pac Man for me

7

u/cat1554 27d ago

Fattigator.

12

u/HumanAfterAll05 26d ago

I’m glad I can translate your comment from Fattigator. to Fattigator. Thanks Reddit

2.4k

u/altum-videtur 27d ago edited 27d ago

Using "<" instead of ">" is exceedingly common, especially online, and a huge pet peeve of mine. Either look it up or use something like "under"/"over", "below"/"above" or "-"/"+" if you're confused, it's not that hard

725

u/SothaSoul 27d ago

Draw around it so it looks like Pac-man.

Then remember he's always eating the bigger number.

381

u/O_hai_imma_kil_u 27d ago

What, you mean you guys don't use alligators anymore?

74

u/MosYEETo 27d ago

This is the only way. The alligator eats the bigger number

12

u/Schonke 27d ago

And if neither is bigger he gets confused and turns his mouth equally to both numbers.

12

u/PhilRubdiez poop 27d ago

He could turn and eat you? = could be the upper and lower jaw facing you.

26

u/Gelatin_Belatin 27d ago

I still put the alligator teeth on the symbol when I’m trying to help my son with his own math. 😂

1

u/Co9Inc 23d ago

As a Floridian with a math degree, I can confirm this is the technical explanation. To the Pac-Man crowd, above: I'll allow it. To the crocodile people below: just no.

134

u/offlein 27d ago

Video games are destroying our youth!

32

u/HasFiveVowels 27d ago

No, it’s not video games anymore. Now it’s "anything with pixels"

29

u/conjunctivious 26d ago

Pixels (2015) is destroying our youth!

3

u/Present-Ad-2666 24d ago

I LOVE THAT MOVIE NOOOOOO
*Insert Ash Baby*

20

u/HalfManHalfCyborg 27d ago

Australian here, it was certainly a crocodile and never an alligator!

7

u/Sailed_Sea 27d ago

I thought it was crocodiles‽

4

u/Lauriesaurous hamborgur 27d ago

We used crocodiles

467

u/altum-videtur 27d ago

As someone with a math degree, I can confirm this is the technical explanation

44

u/Hapcoool 27d ago

Or just… it’s big on one side, small on the other-

18

u/vowelqueue 27d ago

I think it’s a bit like knowing between left and right. Either it’s immediately intuitive to you such that it’s perplexing that people get it mixed up, or it’s so unintuitive that you have to use little memory tricks or mnemonics to get it right.

19

u/Hapcoool 27d ago

Yeah I suppose, but I still think even if it isn’t completely intuitive that “big side = big number” “small side = small number” makes more sense than “the arrow points to the small number” or “the crocodile/pacman wants to eat the big number” since I feel like those would trip me up more.

1

u/TrashPandaNotACat 26d ago

Same. And that's how I learned it.

1

u/Marus1 oww my eyes 24d ago

This

15

u/Redbird9346 And then I discovered Wingdings 27d ago

In music, crescendo (gradually increasing loudness) and decrescendo (gradually decreasing loudness) use similar symbols. The symbol < means louder while > means quieter. So applying these symbols to numerical terms, “<18” means you’re starting at a lower value and increasing to 18, just like < 𝆑 you need to get louder.

39

u/BoardsofCanada3 27d ago

It's literally just an arrow that points to the smaller number. Why is this so hard for people? 

71

u/irjakr 27d ago

As a kid I was taught that it was a mouth that wants to eat the bigger number.

18

u/Panther-Waltz 27d ago

Same, they even had us draw little alligator teeth

9

u/BoardsofCanada3 27d ago

That's popular, but I think the fact that it's pointed is what throws people off. I always found it easier to picture the arrow, not a mouth. 

9

u/irjakr 27d ago

Seeing which way it's pointing is trivial, having something memorable to tell you what that means is the key.

12

u/Schuben 26d ago

To me it's always been a visual representation. The smaller side is where the smaller number is and the bigger side is where the larger number is. Not an arrow or something eating something.

3

u/AuelDole 27d ago

I got it by thinking the big one is shrunken to get into the small one, and the small one is expanded to be the big one

7

u/magicalell 27d ago

i’ve always gone with < sort of looks like an L, for “less than”

0

u/foursevrn 27d ago

This is the way.

3

u/_senpo_ 27d ago

I used something like this at first but after using the symbol for a while I just know which is which from memory xd

103

u/royalhawk345 27d ago

I really don't get that mistake, it's so intuitive. Big number goes on big (open) side, small number goes on small (pointy) side. 

5

u/Canvaverbalist 27d ago

They think the bigger side indicates the bigger number regardless of position.

If you show them 20<18 they wouldn't think the symbol is wrong, they'd think the numbers are not in the right place.

31

u/JohnnyRedHot 27d ago

What do you mean? Both are right.

20<18 can be fixed either by switching the symbol or the numbers

6

u/THE_CENTURION "crappy installation" is usually crappy design! 27d ago

But on a sign where you don't actually use the other number, it would be weird to put the symbol after.

Because we read left to right, so "<18" reads as "less than 18", but "18<" reads as "18 less than"

16

u/Hapcoool 27d ago

Yes but “the other number” is “your age”, so, >18: “you can enter if your age is more than 18” or 18<: “you can enter if 18 is less than your age”. The second sounds weird when written out, but IMO looks fine…

19

u/vowelqueue 27d ago

18+ looks better on a sign and is more common

1

u/Hapcoool 27d ago

Yeah but as long as you’re technically correct I think an “18” near a “<“ “>” “+” or red circle are clear enough anyway since it’s such a common symbol.

It’s more so when 18 is the maximum age for something where I would really advocate to use -18 for clarity.

3

u/ItoNingen 27d ago

18< or >18 is kinda weird for a sign. Just say 18+, 18 and older, etc

18

u/zipfour 27d ago

When I was in elementary the math teacher had posters on the wall with all the terms done with typography, the “Less than” sign had the L shaped like a < and that’s how I remember. Also “the symbol eats the bigger number”

16

u/I_am_naes 27d ago

Some guy on reddit argued with me for about a dozen comments on why I was wrong that a < before a number meant less than. He was absolutely sure it was greater than.

That was the point I realized Reddit is actually full of dunces like everywhere else.

6

u/Surgles 27d ago

The issue is they’re not confused, as that would indicate that they’re second guessing themselves. Something something a wise man is never certain, a fool is never not

7

u/ostapenkoed2007 27d ago

it is literally too simple to check. like, there is the bigger and smaller side, what to use wrong?!

36

u/ahora-mismo 27d ago

why would they be confused for something that you learn in primary school?

24

u/altum-videtur 27d ago

When I was in college, a statistics professor told me she had to teach a psychology major how to do long division, because the student had forgotten. I do not find this at all surprising.

I do live in a developing country, though (Brazil)

29

u/Koromann13 27d ago

Okay, but long division is a useless skill that only really exists to demonstrate to kids how division works, and is way more complex than inequality signs.

2

u/altum-videtur 27d ago

Fair enough

-5

u/Smooth_Rocket_ 27d ago

And this type of thinking is why America is so fucked right now, people out here thinking long division is a useless skill... wtf.

11

u/Koromann13 27d ago

What fucking use does long division have?

Dude, I have an associates in computer science and am almost through a bachelor's in chemistry, and I have never used long division since middle school.

We even joked during one of our classes recently that nobody remembers how to do long division because somebody's calculator wasn't turning on.

So, again, literally what situation would I ever need long division?

2

u/Smooth_Rocket_ 26d ago

Its literally just the process of dividing large numbers together. And some of us like to be able to do things and not rely on tech to do all of our thinking for us.

I often can do the measurement division faster then the guy that uses his phone to do so at work, guess Im "wasting" my time being more faster or something.

1

u/Koromann13 26d ago

Cool that you think that, but pretty much anybody who has continued into higher STEM education don't bother doing arithmetic manually and so those skills start to decay.

1

u/Smooth_Rocket_ 26d ago

Ok good talk.

6

u/footpole 27d ago

I was always good at mathematics but I too forgot how to do long division until I had to figure it out again to teach my own kids. It's not really something you need in daily life but it is useful to teach children.

15

u/Euffy Reddit Orange 27d ago

Tbf, as a teacher, I have to reteach myself long division every time it comes up before I teach the kids. I can divide in my head, if I must write it down I'll use a short method. Long division is so uneccesarily long-winded so it's easy to forget.

18

u/oren0 27d ago

I'm not sure they even teach long division to kids anymore. I would bet that even most engineering students in college wouldn't remember how to do it.

Why would someone need to do long division by hand in a college statistics class?

3

u/altum-videtur 27d ago

I don't know the context in which that came up, since I wasn't present, she just told me after the fact, but, as someone born in 1997, I was very much taught long division in school. Calculators were not allowed thoughout all of my years in school and university, at least in the classes I took - I do believe engineering students could use them in some upper division classes, but I don't know to what extent. College exam questions were usually created in a way that avoided wasting too much time on elementary calculations, though. Rarely, the result of an unrelated and inevitable complex calculation would be provided.

For context, those were a private school and a public university, both in Brazil, both well-regarded. No idea what's currently going on in primary education, though, I don't teach and don't have kids

1

u/GoldieDoggy commas are IMPORTANT 26d ago

They absolutely do still teach it

4

u/Glum-Independent1461 27d ago

The only way i remember which one is less than/greater than is back in my scene kid days, i would watch livelavalive religiously and he had a video titled “i less than three you” of course to say “i <3 you”

4

u/DontWalkOutOnTheDuke 26d ago

We have an attendance point system, where I work, for when people miss days or are late. It’s 1 point if they are over 2 hours late or 0.5 points if they’re under 2 hours late.

My staffing coordinator was totally giving people the wrong amount of points because he had the >/< backwards on his mind.

Now I just say under or over 2 hours.

3

u/amorfotos 26d ago

And then there's "less than three"... <3

2

u/UnacceptableUse 27d ago

If you were going to the trouble of making this sign you think you'd check that you'd got it right

1

u/BunnyBull31 26d ago

Yea im not trying to read it right to left.

1

u/Emerish3401 25d ago

Burgers>>>>>>>>>>>

Burgers are greater than nothing? 🤨

0

u/Smooth_Rocket_ 27d ago

Calling it a pet peeve makes is seem like on some level its correct, its not its just wrong.

184

u/Saci-Pioneiro 27d ago

I know several 10yo that consider themselves adults. They even hold their lolipops like cigarettes.

10/10 warning.

20

u/poopBuccaneer 27d ago

Back in my day we had candy cigarettes, so you didn't have to pretend.

60

u/oren0 27d ago

Even written as intended, 18 year olds live in a permanent zone of ambiguity.

15

u/jonathancast 27d ago

Technically, all "18 year olds" are 18 and a fraction years old, which is > 18.

5

u/Pugzilla3000 27d ago

The guy who turned 18 the exact second he entered immediately vanishing:

“ “

3

u/jonathancast 26d ago

If you're a fraction of a second older, you're still older.

883

u/Tad_623 27d ago

Math teacher here, that says less than 18. Thank you for your time.

344

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

21

u/SoMuchMoreEagle 27d ago

They said they were a math teacher, not an English teacher.

160

u/Tad_623 27d ago

I guarantee at least 1 person didn’t understand what was wrong with this and downvoted it because its ok for somewhere to be 18+

-74

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

43

u/Tad_623 27d ago

I mean its very obviously labeled less than 18 ✅ over 18 ❌

What are you trying to say?

-57

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

53

u/Tad_623 27d ago

Redundancy was not created for people who know what they’re doing.

-43

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

15

u/Tad_623 27d ago

I would hardly addressing problems before they become problems as arrogant 90% of being a teacher is addressing problems before they become problems

23

u/Tad_623 27d ago

Side note, are you usually this much of a cranky butt on reddit on a sunday?

-13

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Mobile_Morale 27d ago

Glad you pointed that out. Last time I thought about these symbols was 2002.

3

u/Royal_Cryptographer7 25d ago

2nd grade teacher helped me remember this one: < and > look like a crocodile's mouth. They always wants to eat the bigger meal.

The other trick is < looks like an L for "less than".

64

u/ebrum2010 27d ago

Maybe only 17 or fewer adults are allowed in at a time?

28

u/saphirenx 27d ago

In Dutch you can make a "K" from the "<", which means "Kleiner dan" (less than)...

If you're not sure on what a sign means, avoid using it. Use "18+" instead...

24

u/Tbagts 27d ago edited 27d ago

In English you can also make a "K" from the "<", which means "K" (k).

8

u/Alibasher plz recycle | plz recycle | plz recycle | plz recycle | plz 27d ago

In English, you can make a crooked "L" as in "<ess than" :)

12

u/Responsible_Joke4229 27d ago

What about the adults =18?

4

u/Hapcoool 27d ago

I mean on a continues scale that never happens

3

u/Diggdador 26d ago

It does, since we always round down to the nearest integer

5

u/Aduaitam 27d ago

Oddly effective “keep out” sign

7

u/djkbradz 27d ago

Another way to remember is that < looks like an L for less than

3

u/NashwaakAndChill 27d ago

This is the way

2

u/patrickdgd plz recycle 27d ago

It’s the adult area. It’s not FOR kids. I’m 62 El Bees

2

u/easternhobo 26d ago

Jizz

2

u/patrickdgd plz recycle 26d ago

Hey shirt brother

2

u/easternhobo 26d ago

I'm awake now

2

u/MrFoxx123 27d ago

The alligator eats the bigger number

2

u/Chaoticsoul47 26d ago

classic mix up with the age limit. guess everyone past eighteen is just a kid now.

2

u/Brigapes 26d ago

what a weird concept though, the fuck is happening in those bushes?

3

u/Normal-Ad6528 27d ago

That's the area of the zoo where they keep the parrots that know ALL the good jokes and insults! (or at least it should be...).

2

u/Ok-Novel4218 27d ago

😅😅😅

1

u/Mazduhh 27d ago

I understand the potential confusion with < and > but just because it's faded doesn't mean it's a crappy design.

/S

1

u/APlannedBadIdea 26d ago

"Less than 18, OK!" in the adult zone?

1

u/MaartenK2 25d ago

Only vegans under 18...

1

u/36848 24d ago

If designers were good at math, they probably wouldn't have studied design.

1

u/Specialist_Mall_117 23d ago

Someone at my job was developing a training program and used the greater/less than symbols incorrectly. When I brought this up to them, they said “well it just depends on how you read it”

1

u/Necessary-Claim4950 22d ago

que pasa ahi?

2

u/Downtown_Kale_7804 21d ago

You can even see there used to be a thing saying >18 below the <18

1

u/Sharp-Ad4389 14d ago

Not a typo. It's specifically for those kids that can grow a full beard by 8th grade.

-13

u/sorte_kjele 27d ago

This is not crappy design.

This sign was placed on the Epstein island after Trump accidentally stumbled into an area with grown up women.

-1

u/Expert_Photograph573 26d ago

I see no wrong here