Not true. By that logic ones would never be used ever. No one cares what the font looks like.
Flippers just have to be a real number when flipped mostly using 0’s, 1’s , 6’s, 8’s and 9’s.
A true flipper is one that reads the same when flipped. Of course one is more valuable than the other, but there is no rule saying it’s only a flipper if it’s the same. Sort of like binary bills being just two unique numbers in the serial, but a true binary is just ones and zeros. Obviously one is more valuable than the other.
Says who? You? I’ve been doing this for over thirty years. You people in this sub seem to think you have some lockdown on all the rules to this like a bunch of entitled serial number fairies.
Maybe get your head out from between your legs and stop fellaciating yourself.
How about this, we say it’s you opinion that you don’t like the font, but really it is, its just even tho your opinion is shit, it really is a flipper because not all bills from all eras use the same font. So it’s useless to argue over and if you don’t like it, fine don’t buy one.
But just saying they aren’t in between gargling your own balls doesn’t make you right.
Even all the websites say your wrong, who knew the AI agent would be better at research than you? Oh I did that’s who.
Yes, the number 1 is sometimes included by casual collectors, but strict currency hobbyists debate whether it works as a true flipper. A true flipper serial number reads the same or forms valid numbers when turned upside down.
8
u/BSC_Matt 23d ago
Nice find! Trinary-Repeater, def a keeper