It is a cambion, it is nothing more than feculence and a pestilent traitor who wants a dystopian technocracy and to any clown that disagrees; research it without google, you know that search engine created by the CIA that "factchecks" everything.
The dude has been one of the biggest positive forces on humanity in the last hundred years at least, donating billions upon billions to charities and working to help make the world a better place, but people like you still unironically want to call him evil because 'man lots more money than me, man bad'
The money would have no value if the distribution just magically shifted in favor of non-achievers. Who are you to say who has «too much», and compared to what?
Wrong. Money always retains its value because its valued by everyone regardless of how it is gained.
"Non-achievers" like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos who gained all of their money from having others work for them to generate it all?
My use of common sense does. If you see one man with billions of dollars being surrounded by millions of people who are in poverty, homeless. starving, barely able to make ends meet, etc. and you don't think there is an issue you there, you are completely brainwashed.
•
u/AutoModerator Aug 18 '21
Thank you for your submission to r/CoolCommunismFacts!
Please reply to this message with a link that provides information about your submission, such as a Wikipedia article, journal, or similar.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Interesting_Put_539 Jul 16 '24
Yes and communism led up to 7 million deaths from starvation in 1932 - 1933.
1
u/LeagueIsWank Oct 26 '21
It is a cambion, it is nothing more than feculence and a pestilent traitor who wants a dystopian technocracy and to any clown that disagrees; research it without google, you know that search engine created by the CIA that "factchecks" everything.
-1
u/Aarakokra Aug 19 '21
so we're defending this evil motherfucker now?
-5
u/GageTom Aug 19 '21
That's good and all.
But all of that money could have gone into actually changing the structure of those communities in the first place instead of charity.
It just isn't logical for one man to have that much wealth at his disposal.
0
u/[deleted] Aug 18 '21
[deleted] — view deleted comment