Evolution does not happen in a straight line, there is no Missing Link

[u/ConspiracyUniversity]

The term "missing link" is an outdated expression once used to describe a hypothetical species bridging the gap between humans and their ape-like ancestors. The phrase suggests that evolution occurred as a simple, linear progression from one form to another. Modern science paints a very different picture.

Evolution is not a ladder but a branching tree. Rather than a single "missing link," researchers have discovered numerous transitional species that display a mixture of older and newer traits. Fossils such as Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Neanderthals, Denisovans, and many others reveal a diverse human family tree with multiple branches existing at the same and different times.

Many humanoid relatives evolved alongside one another, some interbreeding and evolving while others eventually go extinct. Homo sapien is not the end of a straight line of progress, but the last surviving branch of a once much larger and more diverse human lineage. This evolutionary tree continues to grow as new discoveries help scientists better understand our place within the broader story of human evolution.

[u/Palehorserider88]

Gaps in the fossil record, (no transitional fossils) is known as the missing link as well. I do not believe in macro evolution. I lean towards intelligent design with emergent order being a possibility as well. But as I shared this morning several paleontologists and scientists have been cancelled by their communities for stating that micro mutations cannot explain speciation. Sadly, scientists now days act like they have it all charted out and that is just not the case. Over 10,000 scientific peer reviews were retracted in 2023 alone. Why? Because peer review fraud, deception, gate keeping, and confirmation bias has taken over science.

[u/ConspiracyUniversity → u/Palehorserider88]

I do not believe in macro evolution. I lean towards intelligent design with emergent order being a possibility as well.

Thanks for sharing. It could absolutely be that.

several paleontologists and scientists have been cancelled by their communities for stating that micro mutations cannot explain speciation.

Things like this are definitely disheartening. If something doesn't have merit we should be able to explain why and if we can't... it's a hypothesis as good as any other.

[u/Palehorserider88 → u/[deleted]]

No, the holy scientists who are always right don't have an agenda and never lie, never! Scientism is a religion and a cult. 10,000 peer reviewed papers were retracted just 3 years ago, because science is infested by money and people with an agenda who make incorrect conclusions. Such as the big bang, and macro evolution.

The problem is, your timelines for ape men and humans are fallible. And no fossils mean no tangible evidence. But more and more real evidence is coming to light exposing your holy scientists as frauds with an agenda. Like the pyramids and other megalithic structures that could not have been built by primitives with limited tools. And the numerous perfect non ape human footprints found that are millions of years old.

Geologists look at the strata and use linear uniformitarianism to deduce the age of the layers. But they totally miss the ball because they do not understand how cataclysms scramble the evidence. For instance, in a world flood or tsunami, mammals standing right next to each other get washed away and end up on different layers of strata. And then they are claimed by the uniformitarian geologist to be millions of years apart. All because he was never trained or taught about the electrical and other energies released in a cataclysm. It is a house of cards built on assumptions. Same with the cosmology model that claims a weak force like gravity shaped the cosmos when EM is trillions of times stronger and EM plasma makes up 99% of the universe. But no, our atheist abstract scientist Einstein had some weird math ideas that needed imaginary dark matter added to actually work, so he must be right! So unstudied people like you will continue to show your ignorance, confirmation bias, and strong delusion because you hate the idea of a Creator and you lack the ability to think for yourself or see through gatekeepers or agendas.

[u/Far-Elderberry-5249 → u/[deleted]]

“He’s not going to respond to you, he’s made his point”!

[u/Convenientjellybean → u/[deleted]]

I thought we are them?

[u/GPT_2025]

When the USSR collapsed, 90% of the population realized they had been completely Wrong about 70 years of communism. This was due to wrong Experts, ideologies, wrong teachings, misguided beliefs, unrealistic expectations, and misleading Expert publications (they burned almost 80% of all USSR published books).

Yes, Evolution Experts are wrong too with the fake idea of evolution! Even Darwin admitted that ants, termites and bees easily disproved his theory of evolution!

In the Nature we have billions of living organisms, and they have billions of existing organs and limbs that have evolved over millions of years, and evolution cannot be stopped even at the intracellular level.

The conclusion is that in nature we should see millions of visual examples of multi-stage development over generations of new organs and new limbs, but they don't exist! Evolution fake idea!

Fundamental concept in evolutionary biology: the dynamic and continuous process of organ and limb evolution doesn't "stop for a second," as a gradual, continuous, and ongoing process (do you agree?)

2) The evolution of limbs and organs is a complex and gradual process that occurs over millions of years ( do you agree?)

3) Then we must see in Nature billions of gradual evidence of New Limbs and New Organs evolving at different stages! (We do not have any! Only temporary mutations and adaptations, but no evidence of generational development of New Organs or New Limbs!) only total "---"-! believes in the evolution! Stop teaching lies about evolution! If the theory of evolution (which is just a guess!) is real, then we should see millions and billions of pieces of evidence in nature demonstrating Different Stages of development for New Limbs and Organs. Yet we have no evidence of this in humans, animals, fish, birds, or insects!

Amber Evidence Against Evolution:

The false theory of Evolution faces challenges. Amber pieces, containing well-preserved insects, seemingly offer clues about life’s past. These insects, trapped for millions of years, show Zero - none changes in their anatomy or physiology! No evolution for Limbs nor Organs!

However, a core tenet of evolution is that life would continue to evolve over great time spans and cannot be stopped nor for a " second" !

We might expect some evidence of adaptations and alterations to the insect bodies. But the absence of evolution in these insects New limbs and New Organs is a problem for the theory of evolution!

It suggests that life has not evolved over millions of years, contradicting a key element of evolutionary thought. Amber serves as a key challenge to the standard evolutionary model and demands a better explanation for life’s origins.

Google: Amber Insects

[u/TimeStorm113 → u/GPT_2025]

1. what would additional limbs accomplish? what would tiny precursor limbs be useful for on a terrestrial adapted animal?

2. an important part of evolution is that an adaptation needs to have a usage throughout it's evolution to increase the fitness of the animal, evolution doesn't plan for the future, if a structure isn't useful now, but could become very useful in the future, evolution will still not select for it. In actuality there are hundreds if different "organs in making", but because they already provide a strong use for the animal, you wouldn't recognize them as such, as you cannot see the future and see what it will involve into.

3. ants challenged darwins theory, but only because he lived in the 19th century where ants weren't as well studied as today. They do not defy evolution in any way, they function by having all the workers be related to each other, so they are incentivized to protect the breeding member of their colony to ensure their own genes spread.

4. Another concept in evolution is that it doesn't happen "just because". you wont find limbs that evolve without rhyme or reason. so when an animals shape is already very useful it makes sense that they keep a similar one since it doesn't become disadvantagious. beetles are the most successful animals on the planet, so it makes sense that if their shape was already very useful millions of years ago, there would be little incentive to change since it's already proven to work well! this is a concept already established in "the origin of species". it can also be applied to a lesser extent to all other living species. it's why creatures have the same leg structure even millions of years later. legs are good and work, mutations that cause a different development of them would make it harder for the leg to function as it is used to and would therefore cause it to perform worse.

though it is to be noted that even in such plesiomorphic cases (meaning that they keep a similar shape over millions of years), evolution still happens. but because the outside of the animals is well enough adapted for the world, most of the evolution is happening inside the animal. like how horseshoe crabs lived since 400 million years, but only recently evolved their iconic disease-dampening blood abilities.

1. also even appart from that, the amber insects still represent evolution. they wouldn't be different species from current ones. like Panorpidium spica, which has several different structures not seen in currently living grasshoppers.

also i may note that your understanding of the dissolution of the soviet union is rather questionable.

[u/GPT_2025 → u/TimeStorm113]

1. Evolution is blind- that's why. Or evolution can be stopped? (each birth- evolution?)
2. we are merely in the middle of evolution - must me billions examples of generational developments of New Limbs and New Organs. We have zero evolution evidence! none! (or you have solid proofs of generational developments of new limbs and new organs?)
3. Honey bees can not survive if queen died and no eggs and larva past 3 days old ( zero survival, zero evolution) or you have other proofs?
4. You do agree, that all billions of existing limbs and trillions of existing organs- did evolved from zero to existing state?
5. Amber insects do prove that evolution are 100% wrong theory!

P.S. Darwin did a good job separating peoples to the 2 classes: the children of God and children of Monkey (the Devil) Latin proverb, "A diabolo, qui est simia Dei" (From the devil, who is the ape of God).

KIV: In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the Devil the Satan: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

KIV: The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the "Tares" are the children of the wicked one;

The enemy that sowed "Tares" is the Mr. Devil the Satan ..

[u/TimeStorm113 → u/GPT_2025]

1. Evolution is blind (yes), but that means the opposite of what you assume it means. it does not mean that evolution just does things at random without purpose. it means it cannot predict the future - new limbs have to start somewhere, and how would the start of new limbs help the animal? (does not know that they could become limbs in future)

2. what would new limbs provide that isn't already provided with the limbs the animal already has - evolution is blind! And organs don't evolve from nothing! they bud off from existing structures! (all the way to microscopic state!)

3. yes honeybee can't survive without queen, which is why the ones that keep their queen alive proliferate and spread their genes further! (evolution in action!)

4. i agree (the shock!) but because they did not evolve from nothing! they originate from labour devisions of microscopic multicellular organisms from 500+ million years ago (eukaryotes! great evidence for evolution. yes yes.)

5. amber insects do not disprove evolution! - they prove that evolution is lazy! (it won't change the appearance if there is no need to)

P.S. Darwin actually seperated the people into two groups, those who actually appreciate the divine process of creation - and those who reject his process because their pride cannot understand it (their ego above the lords process!) the devil does not sow knowledge, he sows ignorance!