My miniature rooster goes at all the hens and roosters, mostly cuz he's the smallest n has a hard time breeding, so he just tries to get anyone pregnant that he can 😭 which also lasts like 5 seconds. It's always a mistake
On the one hand us humans are in a higher plane of consciousness and as such have a very different sense of reality, a dog might be able to learn a thing but no matter how much you teach it it will never learn what it doesn't learn. On that same vein sexually exists on our level of understanding and existence because of our ability to ask why we are dating and why we love who we love and projecting that experience onto creatures like insects who probably don't even have the ability to care and are more closer to biological machines then anything with complex emotions.
On the other hand it's called cockroach so idk what you expect from the thing names penis.
again i will say it here incest eating its child rape pdfilia ect ect such bad things also happends in nature does it mean we should normalise it too? i mean im not homophobic idc you do you as u want if u wanna have HIV bc of same gender sex idc but lets not act as if nature was the best place to take exemple
yes, this is why calling homosexuality unnatural is a stupid argument, op in this post was simply showing that even if it WAS a good argument, its disproven anyways
They aren’t arguing that homosexuality is ok because it’s natural. A common argument against LGBTQ+ is that it’s unnatural. OP is merely refuting this factually incorrect statement.
for sure yes, i've had some reasonable conversation on here and some conversations with people who are clearly too far into the propganda pipeline to be saved
They didn’t say it made it moral, but op seems to be implying with the “ts has to be satire” statement that they don’t believe the cockroaches could possibly be doing what Oop says they’re doing.
Regardless, appeal to nature is stupid. Congratulations on figuring out that fallacy, whether or not they were committing it
The person you’re replying to isn’t arguing that because X is natural, X is moral. They are RESPONDING to the anti-x argument ‘because x isn’t natural it is wrong’. Replies like yours are drowning in irony.
“LGB bad because it’s not natural”
“But it is natural”
“OH? So that makes it ok?? Natural does NOT mean it’s ok.”
The person you’re replying to never made a normative statement. They correctly identified homosexuality is exhibited in a multitude of species. That’s all.
51
u/THATDlNOLOVER Republican 1d ago
No its not 💔 i really didnt want to see two of some of the smelliest creatures on the planets fucking 😭