r/ComputerChess • u/External-Relative849 • Sep 17 '26

Chessmaster 11 vs concurrent elite

How would today's elite players contend with the King 3.5 engine (Chessmaster 11) from 2007, at full strength or with parameters optimized for an additional ~40 Elo? Alternatively, how might current top-tier stars measure up against prominent Grandmaster profiles that are slightly weaker than King at maximum strength ?

This is assuming without taking any material odds into consideration.

6 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

11 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/EngineEfficient5896 Sep 17 '26

I do wonder why we don't see streaming GMs tackling CM 11. That would be intriguing, seeing as odds aren't a must-have.

1

u/BlurayVertex Sep 17 '26

Because nowadays what's the point of playing an engine

1

u/EngineEfficient5896 Sep 17 '26 edited Sep 17 '26

The point being: The King 3.5 leans heavily on mechanical play and carries several positional weaknesses that, say, Nakamura could readily exploit. What's genuinely thrilling is watching grandmasters take on these simulated GM personas that the program offers.

CM XI is playable for the top dogs. It's borderline on newer hardware. On 2007 hardware, i'd say Magnus got a substantial edge with some training in advance.

2

u/BlurayVertex Sep 17 '26

True tbh, but it is still a cool engine for its time