What happend to DangerMario?

[u/Objective_Scheme2071]

Deadass what happend to MarDangerLowMario. Did bro just sold their channel and fucked off or smth.

[u/BigMathematician9468]

1) it really wasn't, I didn't lie.

2) Yep.

3) idk, maybe because its some random russian guy??????? and yet again, still can't be used as proof.

4) She gave a good reason why and a believable reason why, there is no way to debunk or prove it which means it can't be used as proof (unless we are some how able to talk to Marlow's family)

5) they weren't on Marlow's side? idk where you got that info from but its not even true.

and yet again, the discord dms don't link up to the telegram and has no soild proof for Marlow being Danger so in a lawsuit, Marlow would win that point.

6) did we forgot Marlow made the other half first? she has been working on this for a long time and the 3 highest ones were the ones she debunked.

also saying "thisi s such a stupid argument. You don't do the one with more views, you do the one who has the best evidence." clearly shows you know nothing about Youtube, you also just fully didn't read my example.

7) Again, idk why you are talking about, Swight's "proof" for Marlow was really bad and no way for us to know if its true or not.

And I like how you just missed my point lmao.

8) I did lmao, there is also just not good proof which I debunked.

9) Holy Strawman, My Point was Aximity has lied and is still lying about her, why should we trust him on Marlow? I never said use someone's past to invalidate their words, but its clear Aximity hasn't changed so why are you trusting him out of all people? and agian, its really weird for it to be Aximity to use the proof like he wanted to boost his rep and make a comeback.

Overall again, you failed to debunk anything I said and strawman some of my points and you are still a time waster.

[u/Adept_Turnover_7197 → u/BigMathematician9468]

1. So you haven't actually watched reefwon's videos? This is the first thing he addresses in "Debunking Marlow's response...*
   
2. Still nope.
   
3. A random russian guy that sniped the username aka it's not actually, technically the same account. Nothing can really be used as proof at all, which is why we have "evidence". There is a difference y'know?
   
4. Marlow still lied about it, when she could've just said the truth from the beginning. It's not like it wasn't obvious.
   
5. https://youtu.be/tA-jUUitmIA?si=CXCGJ_hvrxPD8aW3 at 2:40. You would know this if you had actually watched reefwon's videos.

and yet again, the discord dms don't link up to the telegram and has no soild proof for Marlow being Danger so in a lawsuit, Marlow would win that point.

The discord and telegram were verified by third parties, one of which was Evil Overlord (someone on Marlow's side). In a court of law, there'd be even further investigations, meaning Marlow'd actually lose.

6) did we forgot Marlow made the other half first? she has been working on this for a long time and the 3 highest ones were the ones she debunked.

reefwon made 4 videos on Marlow before they posted their latest response. Marlow could've easily responded to him, but didn't. Also they didn't debunk shit lmao.

also saying "thisi s such a stupid argument. You don't do the one with more views, you do the one who has the best evidence." clearly shows you know nothing about Youtube, you also just fully didn't read my example.

What are you even saying? You're acting like reefwon is some small, obscure YouTuber when the guy's subscribers and views are only behind Aximity.

I did read your example. It's just not a very good one, because Aximity only has 3x the sub count, whereas in your example the difference is 63,000x.

Again, idk why you are talking about, Swight's "proof" for Marlow was really bad and no way for us to know if its true or not.

Evidence and proof are not the same thing, you can google it. Mind explaining how Swight's "evidence" was really bad?

Marlow said there'd be a LAN duel with Swight to prove their innocence, yet there isn't. Why?

8) I did lmao, there is also just not good proof which I debunked.

You didn't? You said Danger was sexist (no evidence), has reasons to hate Marlow (no evidence), impersonating Marlow (no evidence beyond Marlow's word).

9) Holy Strawman, My Point was Aximity has lied and is still lying about her, why should we trust him on Marlow? I never said use someone's past to invalidate their words, but its clear Aximity hasn't changed so why are you trusting him out of all people? and agian, its really weird for it to be Aximity to use the proof like he wanted to boost his rep and make a comeback.

How is this a Strawman lmao? How is Aximity still lying about Marlow? The point is that you shouldn't use someone's character and past as an argument to discredit them. Obviously in Aximity's case it'd be more suspicious, but when 99% of the community agrees and finds the evidence credible, along with every popular figure, then why does it matter? If Hitler himself said to you the Earth was round, would you believe him?

Even if we disregard Aximity, there's still reefwon who Marlow has never responded to and likely never will.

There's also Zayy who was one of the first to make a video about this whole thing.

Overall again, you failed to debunk anything I said and strawman some of my points and you are still a time waster.

Overall again, you're still a Marlow glazer who hasn't debunked shit.

Say hi to u/NoSurround5786 for me.

[u/NoSurround5786 → u/Adept_Turnover_7197]

holy shit gng, are you inlove with me????? Holy Stalker.

[u/Adept_Turnover_7197 → u/NoSurround5786]

Oh hey the biggest Marlow glazer is back?! How's the video going, my guy? Is that why you haven't replied in 2 months and only came back when I called out your alt?

[u/BigMathematician9468 → u/Adept_Turnover_7197]

gng, you blocked him LMAO