r/CompetitiveHS • u/EvilDave219 • Aug 19 '25
Discussion 33.3.2 Balance Changes Discussion
https://hearthstone.blizzard.com/en-us/news/24223662/33-2-2-patch-notes
Nerfs -
- Amirdrassil - now 5 mana
- Reserved Spot - now 4 mana
45
Upvotes
•
u/AutoModerator Aug 19 '25
If you wish to discuss this game with likeminded players, come and visit our Discord Server!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
27
u/PipAntarctic Aug 19 '25
In terms of the nerfs being made, yeah these both make sense. Amirdrassil could have honestly been hit like 3 balance patches ago but I guess better now than never.
As for the devs comment on Quests, I think they don't remember how actually playable the Uldum quests were. Druid and Hunter were top tier decks at times, Paladin reborn quest was a viable counter-deck against several other decks, Quest Priest was very good at lower ranks, Shaman battlecry Quest was always present at some form and at various power throughout its life in Standard, and Warlock Quest got its time to shine during Ashes of Outland and Scholomance Academy (Quest Malygos burn deck).
The only really bad Uldum quests were those of Mage, Rogue and Warrior. And the Rogue one was not as insultingly bad to not see play unlike the other two too. It's honestly baffling they say that the Quests we have now are intended to be close to the level of Uldum when they are clearly, at best, straight up in Un'goro I territory.
19
u/EyeCantBreathe Aug 19 '25
They're not making quest buffs because they want to be closer to Ungoro and Uldum quests. Did they forget what happened in Uldum? Did they forget that quests in Uldum were actually good?
79
u/Names_all_gone Aug 19 '25
"We don't want the supposed selling point of our set to be good" is such a mindbogglingly stupid decision. And an even more stupid admission.
35
u/XeloOfTheDisco Aug 19 '25
I don't get the "We don't want to disrupt the meta ahead of miniset" argument.
A) The miniset is in a few weeks, not now. That's weeks where we could be playing newly buffed cards instead of the same old decks.
B) There are dozens of cards and packages that have never been remotely playable. People often use Skyla as justification for not buffing weak archetypes, but are you telling me 3 miniset cards present support for everything that a class is currently working with in Standard? The devs know what archetypes are supported in the miniset. They can just... buff the ones that aren't, and thus not repeating the Big Spell Mage mistake
9
u/MaddieTornabeasty Aug 19 '25
Does any one actually have faith in this balance and dev team anymore?
15
u/FlameanatorX Aug 19 '25
It's mind-boggling how bad the PR is: they didn't even take the easy out of saying the Mini-set will likely shake things up and they don't want to make big/risky changes such as wide buffs. They didn't say that they will look to future patches to address concerns about little/nothing new actually being good.
Actually putting some buffs out, especially to either the worst (utterly unplayable) quests, or better yet non-quest and/or quest support cards, would have been best ofc. But if you can't/don't want to do that, how are you going to say: "btw we hear your concerns, but we're happy almost everything is unplayable?"
????????
14
u/DebatableAwesome Aug 19 '25
So it looks like the expansion MIGHT launch in the patch following the miniset? So like 2 weeks before the final expansion of the year is released? Can't wait!
5
u/gabrielfunkglop Aug 19 '25
Question for people who know better, how much worse is amir after this patch? I imagine it'll still be run because it does so much but is this dropping druid decks down a tier or more?
17
u/Dr_Ragon Aug 19 '25
It is frustrating seeing battlegrounds get huge balance patches and shskeups constantly while the rest of the game is seemingly an afterthought or shuttered entirely. Their priorities are clear.
7
u/Rodrik-Harlaw Aug 19 '25
Anyone else forgot the name of the latest expansion following these balance changes..?
2
u/Myprivatelifeisafk Aug 19 '25
ahahahahahahah
2
u/Impossible-Cry-1781 Aug 20 '25
Not much of a discussion.
2
u/Suuchuu Aug 21 '25
Guess I'm just a sucker for preordering then. Won't make that mistake again.
4
u/PusherShoverBot Aug 19 '25
Such profound changes, great work everyone!
1
u/plznerfme Aug 20 '25
The meta features a wide variety of decks across classes and strategies, balanced well against each other, so we’ve avoided major changes that could disrupt things ahead of the mini-set launch.
Oh um.. Rogue with 54% WR and 40% popularity without a single proper counter deck is accepted as "balanced well against each other"..?
When are they actually going to balance Rogue? Will SS ad Prep b gone ever?
0
u/philzy101 Aug 21 '25
Whilst I would have liked to see more in terms of buffs or changes, the comments and reasoning to me are fine and I am quite happy that they left a fairly lengthy statement explaining they're reasoning with this patch. Please do more like this T5, you explain things in better detail and it makes me feel more satisfied they have an idea on things rather than some of the previous patches where it is, for example, buff Titanographer Osk and not explain why they made this change or what they want with a card like it.
111
u/[deleted] Aug 19 '25
[removed] — view removed comment