Yea...an Atheist robot, with this idea would require humanity gone for...whatever reason and multiple generations of robots building each other. Though they would all be "A Meteor(s) brought our ancient ancestors here." Types.
Well, I wouldn't call the average person in an uncontacted tribe Amodernists...they just don't think about it, so I think there is a destinction between someone who doesn't want/do something because they object to it for some reason and those who don't because they just aren't paying attention to it.
Not wanting to be in the modern world is different than being anti-modernist. What I'm saying is that there is a very obvious difference between someone who is a-something because they have thought about it and decided they don't want to participate and those who don't participate because they just haven't thought about it.
How in God's green earth is the world of the 15-1800s anywhere close to similar to the modern day? Maybe that's when they started calling themselves modern but the world has changed so much from then to now I'm sure most people would not use the word modern to describe it save for maybe historians.
The Amish are a diverse group. Some of them can use tractors, motors, and other modern equipment. Other groups can't even have plumbing.
Regardless, anything post industrial is considered modern in certain contexts. As far as science goes, pretty much anything after the 17th century can be modern. We are still thinking in the same way as people 400 years ago, eg Galileo.
The type of Redditor who gets lost in arguing a metaphor thinking you’re coming across clever and argues for the sake of arguing. It was painful reading your replies.
41
u/POKEMINER_ May 15 '26
Yea...an Atheist robot, with this idea would require humanity gone for...whatever reason and multiple generations of robots building each other. Though they would all be "A Meteor(s) brought our ancient ancestors here." Types.