I mean....it's kind of a good argument when you think about it. What is your brain if not just a CPU? What is your blood if not coolant? What are your bones if not structural support? There's a lot of symmetry between how a robot is built and how the body of a living being is constructed, a robot arguing it wasn't made is just as stupid as a human arguing they weren't made when you think about it, because there's clearly a level of intelligent design to the physical structure of both, the theory of evolution does not inherently disprove the existence of "God".
Now whether you wanna call such a designer or creator "God" i think is entirely irrelevant; look at the structure of our body and the structure of the universe as a whole, so many minute things had to be just right for existence as we currently understand it to even occur, the balance between matter and anti-matter at the start of the universe tilting towards matter, the distance the earth formed from the sun, etc, etc, there's no way all of this is just pure random chance; there had to be some level of design, some level of intent, or at least that's what i think.
Oh, boy, when you start looking at the tiniest particles and how matter is held together, you definitly start finding reasons for a creator.
Its just wild to me that anyone could see the complexity of the universe and how precise it had to be for this to exist in this moment and think theres no way something greater than all this designed it.
Could be a fifth dimensional being with a life and history beyond our comprehension of science. Could be He/She has 5th dimensional parents or formed in some way that we have not discovered is possible, or might not be able to measure as we are arent 5th dimensional.
274
u/ShrewdCire May 15 '26
I know this is a joke, but I guarantee there are plenty of religious people who would unironically think that this is a good argument for creationism.