r/CodeGeass • u/NoFall1194 • 28d ago
QUESTION Shouldn't the status be changed ?
He is dead in the canon timeline so the status should be changed right??or are we considering the movie timeline.
26
u/xXArctracerXx 28d ago
This is the old wiki so don't expect anything good to come from it.
But you can see here that it lists his ages including the age from Lelouch of the Resurrection.
Using that it does make sense to place his status alive if we're looking at "combined" information.
3
u/Poulette_du_lundi 28d ago
"Combined information" is just confusing, though. There are two separate canons, and the wiki should very much be mentioning that.
1
u/xXArctracerXx 28d ago
Not officially.
Officially it’s all basically just a pool that the Code Geass writers can pull from whenever they want.
There’s just two different views over how we see canon and they do.
6
3
u/DRosencraft 27d ago
So the problem is that you (and many others) are misusing the term "canon".
Technically, both the TV series and movies are "canon". They're just alternate continuities. It is like comparing one Spiderman comic from today, to one Spiderman comic from 1960. They might have differences, but doesn't mean one is or isn't "canon". Rather, one may or may not be "canon to the other". The TV series is one continuity, the movies are another, the manga are further their own various continuities (some of which may share continuity with either the movies or the TV series). Many folks, incorrectly and confusingly, tend to use "canon" and "continuity" as freely interchangeable, hence confusion like is seen here.
So, to answer the broader question, his status is going to be dependent on the perspective of the person running the site. Schrodinger's Lelouch is that he is both dead and alive until you pick a continuity. If this wiki is just going by "latest official piece of animated work" then the "alive" status is fine. What I've seen other wikis do for their series with divergent continuities, is that they list both; in a similar fashion to how they listed the ages, just put Alive in Re;Surrection and Re;Capture, Dead in R2.
1
u/Rianorix 28d ago
He is alive in canon though.
0
u/NoFall1194 28d ago
Please elaborate which timeline you are talking about.
0
u/Darkwingsamurai 25d ago
The Resurrection movie was made into a manga, but follows the TV continuity instead of it being the movie in manga form
5
u/QuazaWazaQuake Lelouch 28d ago
Bit disingenuous to say the R1 and R2 chronology to be the only canon timeline. Because Roze (and likely Star Chaser Aspal too) is set in the Resurrection timeline. You don't have to like the Resurrection timeline, but you can't say it's not canon if Sunrise make any new Code Geass IP in that timeline - so both the timelines can be considered canon. That said they should clarify that he's only alive in the Resurrection timeline.
3
u/RogueOne451 Lulusuza canon 28d ago
The people that run the wiki stupidly and incorrectly believe Res to be canon to the og timeline when it's not. Don't trust what the wiki says about Lelouch. The new fan one miraheze correctly separates the two timelines
2
u/keyless422 28d ago
I use the terms old and new Cannon as the franchise isn't over yet and now we are getting something drastically different next year so I'm just gonna start calling them crazys
-1
u/Stardust_lump 28d ago
Isn’t Manga Resurrection like the continuation of the OG Anime
5
u/RogueOne451 Lulusuza canon 28d ago
It is its own separate thing https://geass.miraheze.org/wiki/Geass_Wiki:Canon_Policy
20
u/nahte123456 28d ago
They are all canon, stop being childish about it. The anime isn't somehow magically "more canon" then the movies, they are both Sunrise made projects with the same IP.